Lithuania - A LygaData current as of September 07, 2026

Panevėžys vs Džiugas Telšiai: match statistics

Panevėžys vs Džiugas Telšiai: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Panevėžys played against Džiugas Telšiai in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on April 5, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Panevėžys has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Džiugas Telšiai has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Panevėžys scores 0.83 goals per game and allows 1.67. Džiugas Telšiai scores 1.33 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 2.27 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Panevėžys's games and 50% of Džiugas Telšiai's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 33%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Džiugas Telšiai has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 1.24 per game. Panevėžys takes 10.8 shots per game, while Džiugas Telšiai takes 11.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Panevėžys leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.17 goals per game after halftime. Džiugas Telšiai leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Panevėžys's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Džiugas Telšiai, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

A Lyga games average 2.27 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (2) — Džiugas Telšiai shows superior season numbers: 3 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss and a goal difference of 8-5, while Panevėžys has 2-2-2 and a 5-10 record. The visitors are more efficient in the opponent’s box: away they score 1.4 goals on average with a shot conversion rate of 13% and 3 shots on target per game, whereas the hosts at home produce more shots (14) and more shots on target (5.33) and higher xG (1.54) but convert only 7% and average 1.0 goal. Panevėžys creates better chances (xG 1.54 vs 1.26), which gives them opportunities, but a higher share of goalless home games (33% vs 20% for Džiugas) and poor finishing undermine that advantage. Defensively Džiugas is sturdier — they concede 0.6 goals on average away and keep 60% clean sheets, while Panevėžys concedes 0.67 at home and has only 33% clean sheets. Considering recent form (1.6 points per game for the visitors vs 1.4 for the hosts) and the fact that the hosts draw as many as 67% of home matches, I assign 50% probability to an away win, 30% to a draw and 20% to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Panevėžys has seen BTTS - Yes in 100% of home matches and concedes on average 2.0 goals per home game (10 goals conceded this season), strongly favoring a Both Teams To Score scenario. Džiugas has 60% clean sheets away and concedes 0.6 goals per away match (5 goals conceded this season), while scoring 1.4 goals per game themselves (8 goals this season). xG values are comparable: home xG 1.23 versus xG against the visitors 1.15, and visitors xG 1.26 versus xG against the hosts 1.36, indicating realistic scoring chances for both sides. In the last 5 matches Panevėžys scored 5 and conceded 10, while Džiugas scored 5 and conceded 3, confirming the hosts’ greater susceptibility to conceding. Given the home side’s 100% BTTS rate and higher average goals conceded, I recommend BTTS 'Yes' (70%) over 'No' (30%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG I estimate about 1.19 goals for Panevėžys (home average 1.23 xG_for, away defense 1.15 xG_against) and 1.31 goals for Džiugas (away average 1.26 xG_for, home defense 1.36 xG_against), totaling ~2.50 goals. Panevėžys scores 1.0 and concedes 2.0 per match on average, while Džiugas scores 1.4 and concedes 0.6, so the hosts' weaker defense increases the likelihood of goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.50 yields ~71% probability for Over 1.5; given Panevėžys have 100% of matches over 1.5 this season and Džiugas 60%, I boost the Over 1.5 estimate to 78% (Under 22%). For the 2.5 line Poisson indicates ~46% for Over; season rates show 100% Over 2.5 for the home team and 20% for the away team, plus 60% Over 2.5 in the hosts' last 5 home matches, therefore I assign Over 2.5 a 48% probability (Under 52%). Poisson gives about 24% for Over 3.5, and season values (0% for home, 20% for away) support Under 3.5 (76%), so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Data show a clear advantage for the visitors: Džiugas has a seasonal average of 2.2 points and a 60% win rate, while Panevėžys has 0.0 points per game and 0% wins, with the home side losing 100% of matches. Draws dominate at Halftime — hosts were level at the break in 100% of their games, visitors in 80%, with halftime goals averaging 1.0 for the hosts vs 0.2 for the visitors. In the second half Džiugas’s superiority is pronounced: visitors score an average of 1.2 goals after the break vs 0.0 for the hosts, have an 80% win rate in second halves and 13 points gained in second halves compared to 0 points for the hosts, while the hosts concede on average 1.0 goal in second halves. Both teams’ xG are similar (1.23 vs 1.26), but effectiveness favors the visitors (conversion 13% vs 8%) and seasonally visitors concede 0.6 goals per game vs 2.0 for hosts, so an HT draw with a visitor turnaround after the break is a logical scenario. Therefore the strongest signal is a Half-Time/Full-Time draw at half-time and Džiugas to win (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
6Shots12
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0Shots on target4
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0.88xG1.55
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
7Corners4
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
68Dangerous attacks70
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
10Fouls14
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0Cards2
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0.83Goals scored / game1.33
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
1.67Goals allowed / game0.83
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
48%Average possession47%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
4Shots on target / game3
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.83Shots per game11.17
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
4Shots on target3
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
7.7%Shot conversion11.9%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
48%Possession47%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
1.24xG for1.26
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
1.72xG against1.19
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

Shooting quality

Panevėžys: BalancedDžiugas Telšiai: Balanced
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
Accuracy (shots on target)37%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Džiugas Telšiai is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Panevėžys · 1.6 pts / game - Džiugas Telšiai

Panevėžys
LDLWW
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Džiugas Telšiai
DLWWD
Season result split
50% W33% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WDWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Džiugas Telšiai is 60% better for: goals scored per game.

0.83 goals / game - Panevėžys · 1.33 goals / game - Džiugas Telšiai

Džiugas Telšiai is 101% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - Panevėžys · 0.83 goals / game - Džiugas Telšiai

Panevėžys scoring profile: mixed

Panevėžys scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while Džiugas Telšiai keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).

Džiugas Telšiai scoring profile: very strong

Džiugas Telšiai scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)8
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
10Goals conceded (season)5
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
2.5Average goals per game2.17
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
5Goals scored (last 5)5
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal83%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
17%2 goals33%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0%3 goals17%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0%4 goals0%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal50%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
33%2 goals33%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
33%3 goals0%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
33%4 goals0%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0%BTTS in both halves17%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0%Scored in both halves17%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
60%BTTS - last 540%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panevėžys is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Panevėžys · 0.83 pts / game - Džiugas Telšiai

Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Džiugas Telšiai - half-time state
0% leading83% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)0.83
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
1.5Average goals (1st half)0.83
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
50%No goal before half-time67%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per game (2nd half)2.17
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0.17Goals scored (2nd half)1
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
1Average goals (2nd half)1.33
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
50%Clean sheet after half-time67%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai
83%No goal after half-time33%
PanevėžysDžiugas Telšiai

Panevėžys - second-half results

17% W33% R50% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Džiugas Telšiai - second-half results

67% W17% R17% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Panevėžys - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.81.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Džiugas Telšiai - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.00
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game0.61.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Džiugas Telšiai
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
172%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Džiugas Telšiai

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

PanevėžysLigaDžiugas Telšiai
Average goals per game 2.502.27 2.17
Both teams scored 50%39% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%39% 33%
Clean sheets 33%39% 50%
Goal before half-time 67%64% 50%
Goal after half-time 67%67% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.27
Average goals per game
39%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / game
0.97
Away goals / game
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Džiugas TelšiaiYellow cardNikita Pavlovskij
  2. Džiugas TelšiaiYellow cardIbrahim Cisse
  3. Džiugas TelšiaiGoalIbrahim Cisse
  4. Džiugas TelšiaiSubstitutionOn: Pedro Henrique Pereira VianaOff: Denys Bunchukov
  5. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Joël Fey d'Or BopesuOff: Ernestas Burdzilauskas

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Panevėžys's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses against Džiugas Telšiai. Games average 2.25 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FK Džiugas Telšiai
1 : 4
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
0 : 1
FK Džiugas Telšiai
FK Džiugas Telšiai
1 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
0 : 1
FK Džiugas Telšiai

FAQ

What was the result of Panevėžys vs Džiugas Telšiai?

The A Lyga match finished Panevėžys 0:1 Džiugas Telšiai. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Panevėžys and Džiugas Telšiai?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Panevėžys won 1, Džiugas Telšiai won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs Džiugas Telšiai?

Panevėžys score 0.83 goals per game on average and Džiugas Telšiai 1.33. The A Lyga average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Panevėžys's matches and 50% of Džiugas Telšiai's.

What form are Panevėžys and Džiugas Telšiai in?

Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Džiugas Telšiai 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs Džiugas Telšiai?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.