Lithuania - A LygaPanevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionasData current as of 17 July 2026

Panevėžys vs Sūduva: match statistics

Panevėžys crest
Panevėžys
1 : 2half-time 1:0
Sūduva crest
Sūduva

Panevėžys vs Sūduva: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Panevėžys play Sūduva in A Lyga (Lithuania). The match date is 29 June 2026 at 17:45. Venue: Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Panevėžys: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Sūduva: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Panevėžys scores 0.95 and concedes 1.81 goals per match. Sūduva scores 1.38 and concedes 0.76. League average: 2.58 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Panevėžys 57%, Sūduva 52%. Over 2.5: Panevėžys 62%, Sūduva 48%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Sūduva has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.26. Panevėžys: 11.0 shots per match, Sūduva: 12.5.

Match halves

Panevėžys: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.38. Sūduva: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Panevėžys: 31-45+ (7 goals). Sūduva: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

A Lyga: 2.58 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 1-3-2. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Sūduva is the favorite based on form — the visitors have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in that period (1.8 per game) with 2.6 points per match, whereas Panevėžys has only 1 win and 4 defeats in the last 5, with 5 goals and 0.6 points per game. In terms of chance quality, Sūduva generates on average 1.41 xG on the road versus Panevėžys’s 1.33 xG at home, while conceding a lower xG against (1.19 vs 1.58), which indicates more efficient chance creation and risk limitation. Defensively the disparity is significant: Panevėžys have conceded 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 per game) despite an average of 1.00 goals conceded at home, whereas Sūduva have conceded 3 goals in those 5 games (0.6 per game). Differences in shots and possession are smaller (Sūduva 4.89 shots on target and 12.11 attempts per game vs Panevėžys 4.11 on target and 11.44 attempts), but the advantage in form, recent efficiency and defensive stability favors an away win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
PanevėžysSūduva
11Shots20
PanevėžysSūduva
4Shots on target7
PanevėžysSūduva
1.18xG2.08
PanevėžysSūduva
3Corners7
PanevėžysSūduva
27Dangerous attacks45
PanevėžysSūduva
6Fouls6
PanevėžysSūduva
0Cards1
PanevėžysSūduva

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PanevėžysSūduva
0.95Goals scored / match1.38
PanevėžysSūduva
1.81Goals conceded / match0.76
PanevėžysSūduva
47%Average possession50%
PanevėžysSūduva
3.76Shots on target / match4.57
PanevėžysSūduva

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match12.52
PanevėžysSūduva
3.76Shots on target4.57
PanevėžysSūduva
8.7%Shot conversion11%
PanevėžysSūduva
47%Possession50%
PanevėžysSūduva
1.26xG for1.49
PanevėžysSūduva
1.64xG against1.23
PanevėžysSūduva

Shooting quality

Panevėžys: BalancedSūduva: Balanced
PanevėžysSūduva
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sūduva is 175% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Panevėžys · 2.2 pts / match - Sūduva

Panevėžys
LWLDL
Season result split
29% W19% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-11
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Sūduva
DWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
43% W43% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-3
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-3
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sūduva is 45% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Panevėžys · 1.38 goals / match - Sūduva

Sūduva is 138% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.81 goals / match - Panevėžys · 0.76 goals / match - Sūduva

Panevėžys scoring profile: mixed

Panevėžys scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 matches).

Sūduva scoring profile: very strong

Sūduva scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

20Goals scored (season)29
PanevėžysSūduva
38Goals conceded (season)16
PanevėžysSūduva
2.76Average goals in match2.14
PanevėžysSūduva
5Goals scored (last 5)6
PanevėžysSūduva
11Goals conceded (last 5)3
PanevėžysSūduva

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal71%
PanevėžysSūduva
24%2 goals43%
PanevėžysSūduva
5%3 goals14%
PanevėžysSūduva
0%4 goals5%
PanevėžysSūduva

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal57%
PanevėžysSūduva
48%2 goals19%
PanevėžysSūduva
33%3 goals0%
PanevėžysSūduva
14%4 goals0%
PanevėžysSūduva

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time14%
PanevėžysSūduva
10%BTTS in both halves10%
PanevėžysSūduva
10%Scored in both halves33%
PanevėžysSūduva

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
PanevėžysSūduva
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
PanevėžysSūduva
60%BTTS - last 560%
PanevėžysSūduva

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
PanevėžysSūduva
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
PanevėžysSūduva
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PanevėžysSūduva

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
PanevėžysSūduva
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
PanevėžysSūduva
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
PanevėžysSūduva

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sūduva is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Panevėžys · 1.43 pts / match - Sūduva

Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading24% draw43% trailing
Sūduva - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.43
PanevėžysSūduva
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.52
PanevėžysSūduva
0.95Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
PanevėžysSūduva
1.52Average goals (1st half)0.81
PanevėžysSūduva
38%Clean sheet before half-time71%
PanevėžysSūduva
57%No goal before half-time57%
PanevėžysSūduva

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.62
PanevėžysSūduva
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
PanevėžysSūduva
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
PanevėžysSūduva
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.33
PanevėžysSūduva
43%Clean sheet after half-time57%
PanevėžysSūduva
67%No goal after half-time38%
PanevėžysSūduva

Panevėžys - second-half results

19% W38% R43% P
26
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding88%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sūduva - second-half results

33% W62% R5% P
30
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Panevėžys - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Sūduva - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
3
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
0
5
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Sūduva
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
6
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
5
61-75
11
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Sūduva

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

PanevėžysLigaSūduva
Average goals in match 2.762.58 2.14
Both teams scored 57%49% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%54% 48%
Clean sheets 14%32% 43%
Goal before half-time 81%68% 57%
Goal after half-time 76%76% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.58
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Panevėžys 1 - 3 - 2 Sūduva. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FK Sūduva Marijampolė
1 : 0
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
0 : 0
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
1 : 1
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
1 : 2
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
FK Sūduva Marijampolė
0 : 0
FK Panevėžys
FK Panevėžys
2 : 0
FK Sūduva Marijampolė

FAQ

What was the result of Panevėžys vs Sūduva?

The A Lyga match finished Panevėžys 1:2 Sūduva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Panevėžys and Sūduva?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Panevėžys won 1, Sūduva won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs Sūduva?

Panevėžys score 0.95 goals per game on average and Sūduva 1.38. The A Lyga average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Panevėžys's matches and 52% of Sūduva's.

What form are Panevėžys and Sūduva in?

Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sūduva 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs Sūduva?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Panevėžys vs Sūduva: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.