Lithuania - A LygaPanevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionasData current as of September 06, 2026

Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius: match statistics

Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Panevėžys played against TransINVEST Vilnius in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on June 12, 2026. Venue: Panevėžio futbolo akademijos stadionas. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Panevėžys has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. TransINVEST Vilnius has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Panevėžys scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 1.67. TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.81 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.56 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 53% of Panevėžys's games and 56% of TransINVEST Vilnius's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 69%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

TransINVEST Vilnius has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.15 per game. Panevėžys takes 9.8 shots per game, while TransINVEST Vilnius takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Panevėžys leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. TransINVEST Vilnius leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.94 after halftime.

When the teams score

Panevėžys's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For TransINVEST Vilnius, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

A Lyga games average 2.56 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (TransINVEST Vilnius) because they have scored 29 goals this season versus the hosts' 14 and sit 3rd in the table compared to Panevėžys in 7th. TransINVEST average 2.25 goals per away match with an average xG of 1.41 and a shot conversion rate of 19%, while Panevėžys score 1.00 goals at home with xG 1.26 and a 9% conversion. Form supports the visitors’ edge — in the last 5 matches TransINVEST have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2.0 points per game, whereas the hosts have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses and 1.4 points per game. Panevėžys do, however, possess a solid home defense — only 0.71 goals conceded per match on average and 29% clean sheets, which reduces the likelihood of a big away victory and increases the probability of a draw. Considering the goals advantage 29:14, superior conversion 19% vs 9% and higher recent points per match (2.0 vs 1.4), I rate TransINVEST as more likely to win with a moderate chance of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project BTTS - Yes with a 65% probability vs 35% No. TransINVEST averages 2.25 goals per match, has 63% BTTS rate this season (60% in last 5) and an attacking xG of 1.41, exceeding the hosts' defensive xG of 1.17 — a strong indicator for the visitors to score. Panevėžys concedes only 0.75 goals seasonally and has 50% clean sheets, but in the last 5 matches they conceded 1.6 goals on average and had only 40% BTTS, so recent defensive form is weaker than the seasonal picture. Additionally TransINVEST registers more shots on target 5.13 vs 3.88 and has a higher conversion rate 19% vs 10%, and the high percentage of away matches with over 2.5 goals (88%) plus 63% of games combining Over 2.5 and BTTS confirm a tendency toward both-teams-to-score affairs. Overall TransINVEST’s offensive metrics (2.25 avg and 63% BTTS) outweigh Panevėžys (1.38 scored and 50% clean sheets), therefore the ‘Yes’ bet appears the stronger and more likely choice.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

After weighing xG and seasonal averages I estimate 1.42 goals for Panevėžys and 1.40 for TransINVEST, totaling approximately 2.82 goals. Offensive xG are 1.57 for the home side and 1.41 for the visitors, while xG against is 1.17 for the home team and 1.21 for the visitors, yielding xG-based expectations of about 1.39 and 1.29 before season-adjustments. Seasonal figures confirm TransINVEST’s attacking pressure — the visitors average 2.25 goals per game and have 88% of matches over 2.5 goals, and both teams recorded 60% of matches over 2.5 in their last 5 outings. A Poisson model at a total of 2.82 estimates roughly 77% for Over 1.5, about 54% for Over 2.5 and around 31% for Over 3.5, indicating a clear edge to Over markets, especially the 1.5 line. Therefore I recommend the Over 1.5 bet (line 1.5, side: over) as the strongest signal from the available data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back HT/FT 2/2 — TransINVEST leading at the break and the visitors winning after 90 minutes. In their last 5 matches the visitors led at the break in 60% of games and scored on average 1.2 first-half goals versus Panevėžys’s 0.6 (60% and 1.2 vs 0.6), which is a clear signal favoring the away side in the first half. Although seasonally the home team concedes only 0.25 goals before the break, their recent five fixtures show greater vulnerability — they conceded on average 1.0 first-half goal in the last 5 matches, undermining the home defensive season form (0.25 vs 1.0). Seasonal metrics support the visitors’ attacking edge: TransINVEST averages 2.25 goals per match, registers 5.13 shots on target and converts at 19%, while Panevėžys records 1.38 goals, 3.88 shots on target and a 10% conversion rate (2.25 vs 1.38; 5.13 vs 3.88; 19% vs 10%). Additionally, the visitors have won 60% of their last 5 matches compared to 40% for the hosts, and 63% of the visitors’ season matches feature goals at both ends; therefore the strongest scenario from the data is 2/2 — the visitors leading at the break and winning the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
13Shots22
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
4Shots on target6
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.41xG2.19
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
3Corners11
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
41Dangerous attacks53
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
8Fouls9
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1Cards3
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.93Goals scored / game1.81
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.67Goals allowed / game1.13
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
47%Average possession48%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
3.53Shots on target / game4.5
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.8Shots per game12.88
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
3.53Shots on target4.5
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
9.5%Shot conversion14.1%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
47%Possession48%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.15xG for1.49
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.62xG against1.19
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Shooting quality

Panevėžys: BalancedTransINVEST Vilnius: Efficient finishing
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Panevėžys · 1.6 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius

Panevėžys
WLDWL
Season result split
33% W20% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-7
1.20 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
TransINVEST Vilnius
DDWLW
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-4
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 95% better for: goals scored per game.

0.93 goals / game - Panevėžys · 1.81 goals / game - TransINVEST Vilnius

TransINVEST Vilnius is 48% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - Panevėžys · 1.13 goals / game - TransINVEST Vilnius

Panevėžys scoring profile: strong

Panevėžys scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 meczów), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).

TransINVEST Vilnius scoring profile: very strong

TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 meczów), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).

14Goals scored (season)29
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
25Goals conceded (season)18
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
2.6Average goals per game2.94
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
6Goals scored (last 5)8
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal88%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
27%2 goals56%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0%3 goals19%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0%4 goals13%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal63%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
33%2 goals38%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
33%3 goals13%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
20%4 goals0%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
TransINVEST Vilnius - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 16 meczów
47%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time25%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
7%BTTS in both halves6%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
7%Scored in both halves44%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
60%BTTS - last 580%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / game - Panevėžys · 1.81 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius

Panevėžys - half-time state
33% leading27% draw40% trailing
TransINVEST Vilnius - half-time state
50% leading31% draw19% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per game (1st half)1.81
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.88
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.31
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
40%Clean sheet before half-time63%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
53%No goal before half-time31%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.25
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
1.13Average goals (2nd half)1.63
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
53%Clean sheet after half-time50%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius
73%No goal after half-time38%
PanevėžysTransINVEST Vilnius

Panevėžys - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
29
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Panevėžys - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game1.20.6
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
TransINVEST Vilnius - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.200.40
Goals scored / game1.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
0
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

TransINVEST Vilnius
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
4
2
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
144%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

TransINVEST Vilnius

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

PanevėžysLigaTransINVEST Vilnius
Average goals per game 2.602.56 2.94
Both teams scored 53%47% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%52% 69%
Clean sheets 20%32% 38%
Goal before half-time 80%70% 81%
Goal after half-time 67%76% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.16
Away goals / game
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TransINVEST VilniusGoalYehor Hlushach
  2. TransINVEST VilniusYellow cardIker Bilbao Mendiguren
  3. TransINVEST VilniusGoalXabier Auzmendi ArruabarrenaAssist: Hideyasu Tanaka
  4. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Miano van den BosOff: Oleksandr Kurtsev
  5. PanevėžysGoalSalomon KouadioAssist: Isaac Asante
  6. PanevėžysYellow cardSalomon Kouadio
  7. TransINVEST VilniusYellow cardMantas Bertašius
  8. TransINVEST VilniusYellow cardDomantas Šluta

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Panevėžys's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against TransINVEST Vilnius. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius?

The A Lyga match finished Panevėžys 1:2 TransINVEST Vilnius. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius?

Panevėžys score 0.93 goals per game on average and TransINVEST Vilnius 1.81. The A Lyga average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Panevėžys's matches and 56% of TransINVEST Vilnius's.

What form are Panevėžys and TransINVEST Vilnius in?

Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and TransINVEST Vilnius 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius?

The statistical background for Panevėžys vs TransINVEST Vilnius — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.