Iran - Azadegan LeagueShahid Dastgerdi StadiumData current as of 16 July 2026

Pars Jam Bushehr vs Navad Urmia: match statistics

Pars Jam Bushehr crest
Pars Jam Bushehr
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Navad Urmia crest
Navad Urmia

Pars Jam Bushehr vs Navad Urmia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pars Jam Bushehr play Navad Urmia in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 18:00. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Pars Jam Bushehr: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Navad Urmia: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pars Jam Bushehr scores 1.27 and concedes 0.64 goals per match. Navad Urmia scores 0.50 and concedes 1.25. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pars Jam Bushehr 36%, Navad Urmia 31%. Over 2.5: Pars Jam Bushehr 30%, Navad Urmia 19%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Pars Jam Bushehr has higher xG: 0.93 vs 0.79. Pars Jam Bushehr: 0.6 shots per match, Navad Urmia: 1.0.

Match halves

Pars Jam Bushehr: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.67. Navad Urmia: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

Pars Jam Bushehr: 16-30 (9 goals). Navad Urmia: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Pars Jam Bushehr is the clear favorite — 5th in the table versus Navad Urmia’s 17th, with 33 goals scored this season compared to 15 by the visitors. In the last 5 matches the home side have scored 5 goals, recorded 2 wins and 3 draws (avg. 1.8 points per game), while Navad have failed to score in their last 5 fixtures and average only 0.4 points per game. Defensively Pars Jam performs better: they concede 0.6 goals per home match on average and keep clean sheets in 60% of games, whereas Navad concede 1.2 goals away and have a 20% clean sheet rate. The visitors’ attack is ineffective — away goals average 0.33 with shot conversion around 4% and away xG 0.79 versus xG against 1.3, indicating a lack of high-quality chances. Considering the goal-difference advantage (+6 at home vs -13 for the visitors) and Navad’s five-match goalless run, I project a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
-1Shots-1
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
-1Shots on target-1
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0xG0
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
-1Corners-1
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0Dangerous attacks0
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
-1Fouls-1
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
-1Cards-1
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
1.27Goals scored / match0.5
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0.64Goals conceded / match1.25
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
11%Average possession12%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0.15Shots on target / match-0.12
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

0.61Shots per match1
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0.15Shots on target-0.12
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
210%Shot conversion50%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
11%Possession12%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0.93xG for0.79
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
1.06xG against1.3
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

Shooting quality

Pars Jam Bushehr: Counter-attackingNavad Urmia: Counter-attacking
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
Accuracy (shots on target)25%-12%
Chance quality (xG per shot)1.520.79
Finishing (goals per shot on target)8.470.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 1000% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr · 0.2 pts / match - Navad Urmia

Pars Jam Bushehr
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W36% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-12-6
1.73 pts / match · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-7-3
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 2.75BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Navad Urmia
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W38% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-12-16
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-11
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.26Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 154% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr · 0.5 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Pars Jam Bushehr is 95% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.64 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr · 1.25 goals / match - Navad Urmia

Pars Jam Bushehr scoring profile: very strong

Pars Jam Bushehr scores in 73% of matches (24 of 33 matches), while Navad Urmia keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).

Navad Urmia scoring profile: more difficult

Navad Urmia scores in 44% of matches (14 of 32 matches), while Pars Jam Bushehr keeps a clean sheet in 52% (17 of 33 matches).

42Goals scored (season)16
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
21Goals conceded (season)40
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
1.91Average goals in match1.75
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
10Goals scored (last 5)1
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
1Goals conceded (last 5)10
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal44%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
36%2 goals3%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
9%3 goals3%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
6%4 goals0%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

How often they concede at least...

48%1 goal72%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
15%2 goals31%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0%3 goals9%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0%4 goals6%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

36%
Pars Jam Bushehr - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 33 matches
30%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time9%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
24%Scored in both halves3%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS9%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
20%BTTS - last 520%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 80% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.64 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr · 0.91 pts / match - Navad Urmia

Pars Jam Bushehr - half-time state
39% leading45% draw15% trailing
Navad Urmia - half-time state
13% leading53% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.64Points per match (1st half)0.91
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0.82Average goals (1st half)0.84
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
79%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
55%No goal before half-time78%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.52Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
1Average goals (2nd half)0.81
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
73%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia
52%No goal after half-time75%
Pars Jam BushehrNavad Urmia

Pars Jam Bushehr - second-half results

33% W52% R15% P
54
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navad Urmia - second-half results

13% W56% R31% P
29
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pars Jam Bushehr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.2
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Navad Urmia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-3-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pars Jam Bushehr
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
9
4
16-30
6
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
8
3
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Navad Urmia
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
2
6
16-30
5
10
31-45
1
3
46-60
3
6
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pars Jam Bushehr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-22.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Navad Urmia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Pars Jam BushehrLigaNavad Urmia
Average goals in match 1.911.59 1.75
Both teams scored 36%30% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%22% 19%
Clean sheets 52%46% 28%
Goal before half-time 61%46% 53%
Goal after half-time 61%57% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.68
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pars Jam Bushehr 0 - 1 - 0 Navad Urmia. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Pars Jam Bushehr vs Navad Urmia?

The Azadegan League match finished Pars Jam Bushehr 2:0 Navad Urmia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pars Jam Bushehr vs Navad Urmia?

Pars Jam Bushehr score 1.27 goals per game on average and Navad Urmia 0.50. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Pars Jam Bushehr's matches and 31% of Navad Urmia's.

What form are Pars Jam Bushehr and Navad Urmia in?

Over the last 5 games Pars Jam Bushehr have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Navad Urmia 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pars Jam Bushehr vs Navad Urmia?

The statistical background for Pars Jam Bushehr vs Navad Urmia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.