Greece - Super League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

PAS Giannina vs Nestos Chrisoupolis: match statistics

135%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates very balanced chances for both teams, which points to a draw. PAS Giannina is in poor form with only one win in their last five matches and just a 20% win rate at home, however, they boast a better xG (1.09 vs 0.8) and higher ball possession at their home ground. Nestos Chrisoupolis is in much better form with three wins in their last five matches, but they struggle away from home, where they win only 20% of matches and do not score often (0.8 on average per match). Both teams are characterized by similar offensive and defensive efficiency, and the high percentage of draws in their matches (40% for the hosts, 30% for the visitors) further confirms this prediction. Taking into account PAS Giannina's poor form, but their home advantage, and the visitors' better recent form coupled with their away weaknesses, a draw seems the most likely outcome of this match.

PAS Giannina vs Nestos Chrisoupolis: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PAS Giannina play Nestos Chrisoupolis in Super League 2 (Greece). The match date is 8 March 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

PAS Giannina: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Nestos Chrisoupolis: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

PAS Giannina scores 0.86 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Nestos Chrisoupolis scores 1.07 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.28 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PAS Giannina 39%, Nestos Chrisoupolis 36%. Over 2.5: PAS Giannina 43%, Nestos Chrisoupolis 32%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

PAS Giannina has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.91. PAS Giannina: 7.4 shots per match, Nestos Chrisoupolis: 5.3.

Match halves

PAS Giannina: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.46. Nestos Chrisoupolis: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.61.

Goals by minute

PAS Giannina: 76-90+ (7 goals). Nestos Chrisoupolis: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League 2: 2.28 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-0-3. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates very balanced chances for both teams, which points to a draw. PAS Giannina is in poor form with only one win in their last five matches and just a 20% win rate at home, however, they boast a better xG (1.09 vs 0.8) and higher ball possession at their home ground. Nestos Chrisoupolis is in much better form with three wins in their last five matches, but they struggle away from home, where they win only 20% of matches and do not score often (0.8 on average per match). Both teams are characterized by similar offensive and defensive efficiency, and the high percentage of draws in their matches (40% for the hosts, 30% for the visitors) further confirms this prediction. Taking into account PAS Giannina's poor form, but their home advantage, and the visitors' better recent form coupled with their away weaknesses, a draw seems the most likely outcome of this match.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
17Shots2
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
6Shots on target1
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
2.25xG0.43
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
8Corners0
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
105Dangerous attacks31
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
-1Fouls-1
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
-1Cards-1
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
0.86Goals scored / match1.07
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
1.46Goals conceded / match0.93
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
48%Average possession41%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
3.04Shots on target / match2
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.39Shots per match5.29
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
3.04Shots on target2
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
11.6%Shot conversion20.3%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
48%Possession41%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
1.1xG for0.91
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
1.17xG against1.1
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

Shooting quality

PAS Giannina: BalancedNestos Chrisoupolis: Counter-attacking
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
Accuracy (shots on target)41%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.54

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nestos Chrisoupolis is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - PAS Giannina · 2.2 pts / match - Nestos Chrisoupolis

PAS Giannina
DLWLW
Season result split
18% W21% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-17
0.75 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-6-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Nestos Chrisoupolis
WWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
39% W25% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-10
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-6-5
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 0.77BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nestos Chrisoupolis is 24% better for: goals scored per match.

0.86 goals / match - PAS Giannina · 1.07 goals / match - Nestos Chrisoupolis

Nestos Chrisoupolis is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.46 goals / match - PAS Giannina · 0.93 goals / match - Nestos Chrisoupolis

PAS Giannina scoring profile: mixed

PAS Giannina scores in 50% of matches (14 of 28 matches), while Nestos Chrisoupolis keeps a clean sheet in 39% (11 of 28 matches).

Nestos Chrisoupolis scoring profile: strong

Nestos Chrisoupolis scores in 64% of matches (18 of 28 matches), while PAS Giannina keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 matches).

24Goals scored (season)30
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
41Goals conceded (season)26
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
2.32Average goals in match2
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
10Goals scored (last 5)9
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
9Goals conceded (last 5)3
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal64%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
21%2 goals29%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
11%3 goals7%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
4%4 goals4%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal61%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
43%2 goals29%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
18%3 goals4%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
7%4 goals0%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

36%
Nestos Chrisoupolis - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 28 matches
40%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time11%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
4%BTTS in both halves0%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
7%Scored in both halves14%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
80%BTTS - last 540%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time43%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nestos Chrisoupolis is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.96 pts / match - PAS Giannina · 1.43 pts / match - Nestos Chrisoupolis

PAS Giannina - half-time state
14% leading54% draw32% trailing
Nestos Chrisoupolis - half-time state
29% leading57% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.96Points per match (1st half)1.43
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.46
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
1.04Average goals (1st half)0.71
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
54%Clean sheet before half-time79%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
71%No goal before half-time68%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.25
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.61
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.29
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
39%Clean sheet after half-time43%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis
71%No goal after half-time54%
PAS GianninaNestos Chrisoupolis

PAS Giannina - second-half results

21% W36% R43% P
27
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nestos Chrisoupolis - second-half results

32% W29% R39% P
40
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PAS Giannina - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.02.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Nestos Chrisoupolis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PAS Giannina
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
5
16-30
5
9
31-45
5
5
46-60
1
7
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Nestos Chrisoupolis
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
2
4
16-30
5
2
31-45
2
5
46-60
10
8
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PAS Giannina

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Nestos Chrisoupolis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).

Teams vs league

PAS GianninaLigaNestos Chrisoupolis
Average goals in match 2.322.28 2.00
Both teams scored 39%40% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%39% 32%
Clean sheets 21%34% 39%
Goal before half-time 57%64% 43%
Goal after half-time 71%75% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.28
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): PAS Giannina 0 - 0 - 3 Nestos Chrisoupolis. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Nestos Chrisoupolis
1 : 0
PAS Giannina
PAS Giannina
0 : 1
Nestos Chrisoupolis
Nestos Chrisoupolis
1 : 0
PAS Giannina

FAQ

What was the result of PAS Giannina vs Nestos Chrisoupolis?

The Super League 2 match finished PAS Giannina 0:0 Nestos Chrisoupolis. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PAS Giannina and Nestos Chrisoupolis?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches PAS Giannina won 0, Nestos Chrisoupolis won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PAS Giannina vs Nestos Chrisoupolis?

PAS Giannina score 0.86 goals per game on average and Nestos Chrisoupolis 1.07. The Super League 2 average is 2.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 39% of PAS Giannina's matches and 36% of Nestos Chrisoupolis's.

What form are PAS Giannina and Nestos Chrisoupolis in?

Over the last 5 games PAS Giannina have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Nestos Chrisoupolis 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PAS Giannina vs Nestos Chrisoupolis?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PAS Giannina vs Nestos Chrisoupolis: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.