Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen: match statistics
Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Patro Eisden played against AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Patro Stadion. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Patro Eisden has 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.75 points per game. AS Eupen has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Patro Eisden scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 2.25. AS Eupen scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Patro Eisden's games and 67% of AS Eupen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 67%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
AS Eupen has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.35 per game. Patro Eisden takes 13.0 shots per game, while AS Eupen takes 13.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Patro Eisden leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.25 goals per game after halftime. AS Eupen leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Patro Eisden's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For AS Eupen, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
AS Eupen sit 5th, while Patro Eisden are 13th, and the visitors have averaged 1.4 points per match in their last five games compared with just 0.6 for the hosts. Patro have lost 4 of their last 5 matches and conceded 12 goals during that period, significantly weakening their chances despite home advantage. Eupen have been more effective in recent outings, scoring 10 goals in five matches compared with Patro’s 8, and have conceded only 3 goals in 3 matches this season. The hosts create chances at home worth an average xG of 1.40, but Eupen produce an even higher away xG of 1.75 and average 43% possession compared with Patro’s 34%. Neither team has recorded a match without scoring, so the game could be closely contested in terms of goals, but the stronger form trend and higher league position favor an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Patro Eisden has recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, while AS Eupen stands at 50%; over the last five games, the figures are 100% and 80%, respectively. The hosts have recently conceded an average of 2.4 goals per game, with their average xG against standing at 1.61, which clearly supports Eupen’s chances of scoring. The visitors are in good attacking form, averaging 2.0 goals in their last five matches with an xG of 1.74. Patro Eisden should also find the net, as they create an average of 1.68 xG and register 7 shots on target per game, while Eupen’s defense allows an average of 1.79 xG. Although Eupen have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their league matches this season, the current profiles of both teams are more goal-oriented than the league-average BTTS rate of 46%. Therefore, BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal appears to be the stronger selection, while BTTS - No would mean that at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0:0 draw or a match in which neither side scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Patro Eisden have averaged 1.6 goals scored and as many as 2.4 conceded in their last five matches, resulting in an average of 4.0 total goals per game. Over the same period, AS Eupen have averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded per match, with Over 2.5 goals landing in 100% and 80% of their respective last five appearances. The xG metrics also point towards goals: the hosts create chances worth 1.50 xG, while the visitors produce 1.74 xG, with their defenses simultaneously allowing 1.61 and 1.39 xG, respectively. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as it combines both sides' attacking potential with Patro Eisden's very poor recent defensive record and requires just two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an AS Eupen win in the match, as the visitors were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 games, compared with just 2 of 5 for Patro Eisden. In the same sample, the hosts were trailing at half-time in 60% of matches, scoring just 0.2 goals per game before the break versus AS Eupen’s 0.8. The full-time outlook also favors the visitors: AS Eupen average 1.4 points per game and win 40% of their matches, while Patro Eisden average 0.6 points and have lost 80% of their games. After the break, the hosts concede an average of 1.6 goals, while the visitors score 1.2, increasing AS Eupen’s chances of turning an evenly balanced match in their favor in the second half. Although Patro Eisden have a higher home xG average—1.68 compared with the visitors’ 1.75—the hosts’ weaker current attacking efficiency and post-break defensive record reduce the likelihood of them holding onto a lead.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Patro Eisden | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AS Eupen is 167% better for: last-5 form.
0.75 pts / game - Patro Eisden · 2 pts / game - AS Eupen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AS Eupen is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Patro Eisden · 2 goals / game - AS Eupen
AS Eupen is 125% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.25 goals / game - Patro Eisden · 1 goals / game - AS Eupen
Patro Eisden scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
AS Eupen scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Patro Eisden
Over / Under - AS Eupen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AS Eupen is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / game - Patro Eisden · 0.67 pts / game - AS Eupen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Patro Eisden - second-half results
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
AS Eupen - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 25% |
| No goal | 75% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.67 | 2.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 1.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 67% |
| No goal | 67% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Patro Eisden
AS Eupen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Patro Eisden | Liga | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.75 | 3.09 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 79% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 85% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Patro Eisden's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against AS Eupen. Games average 0.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?
The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 1:2 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Patro Eisden and AS Eupen?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Patro Eisden won 0, AS Eupen won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?
Patro Eisden score 1.50 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 2.00. The First Division B average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Patro Eisden's matches and 67% of AS Eupen's.
What form are Patro Eisden and AS Eupen in?
Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 1-0-3 record (0.75 points per game) and AS Eupen 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


