Belgium - First Division BPatro StadionData current as of September 19, 2026

Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen: match statistics

Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden
1 : 2half-time 0:1
AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen

Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Patro Eisden played against AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Patro Stadion. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Patro Eisden has 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.75 points per game. AS Eupen has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Patro Eisden scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 2.25. AS Eupen scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Patro Eisden's games and 67% of AS Eupen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 67%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

AS Eupen has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.35 per game. Patro Eisden takes 13.0 shots per game, while AS Eupen takes 13.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Patro Eisden leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.25 goals per game after halftime. AS Eupen leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Patro Eisden's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For AS Eupen, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AS Eupen sit 5th, while Patro Eisden are 13th, and the visitors have averaged 1.4 points per match in their last five games compared with just 0.6 for the hosts. Patro have lost 4 of their last 5 matches and conceded 12 goals during that period, significantly weakening their chances despite home advantage. Eupen have been more effective in recent outings, scoring 10 goals in five matches compared with Patro’s 8, and have conceded only 3 goals in 3 matches this season. The hosts create chances at home worth an average xG of 1.40, but Eupen produce an even higher away xG of 1.75 and average 43% possession compared with Patro’s 34%. Neither team has recorded a match without scoring, so the game could be closely contested in terms of goals, but the stronger form trend and higher league position favor an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Patro Eisden has recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far, while AS Eupen stands at 50%; over the last five games, the figures are 100% and 80%, respectively. The hosts have recently conceded an average of 2.4 goals per game, with their average xG against standing at 1.61, which clearly supports Eupen’s chances of scoring. The visitors are in good attacking form, averaging 2.0 goals in their last five matches with an xG of 1.74. Patro Eisden should also find the net, as they create an average of 1.68 xG and register 7 shots on target per game, while Eupen’s defense allows an average of 1.79 xG. Although Eupen have kept a clean sheet in 50% of their league matches this season, the current profiles of both teams are more goal-oriented than the league-average BTTS rate of 46%. Therefore, BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal appears to be the stronger selection, while BTTS - No would mean that at least one team fails to score—not necessarily a 0:0 draw or a match in which neither side scores.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Patro Eisden have averaged 1.6 goals scored and as many as 2.4 conceded in their last five matches, resulting in an average of 4.0 total goals per game. Over the same period, AS Eupen have averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded per match, with Over 2.5 goals landing in 100% and 80% of their respective last five appearances. The xG metrics also point towards goals: the hosts create chances worth 1.50 xG, while the visitors produce 1.74 xG, with their defenses simultaneously allowing 1.61 and 1.39 xG, respectively. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as it combines both sides' attacking potential with Patro Eisden's very poor recent defensive record and requires just two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an AS Eupen win in the match, as the visitors were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 games, compared with just 2 of 5 for Patro Eisden. In the same sample, the hosts were trailing at half-time in 60% of matches, scoring just 0.2 goals per game before the break versus AS Eupen’s 0.8. The full-time outlook also favors the visitors: AS Eupen average 1.4 points per game and win 40% of their matches, while Patro Eisden average 0.6 points and have lost 80% of their games. After the break, the hosts concede an average of 1.6 goals, while the visitors score 1.2, increasing AS Eupen’s chances of turning an evenly balanced match in their favor in the second half. Although Patro Eisden have a higher home xG average—1.68 compared with the visitors’ 1.75—the hosts’ weaker current attacking efficiency and post-break defensive record reduce the likelihood of them holding onto a lead.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

38Possession (%)62
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
11Shots14
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1Shots on target8
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.05xG1.71
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
4Corners3
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
39Dangerous attacks36
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
14Fouls18
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1Cards3
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.5Goals scored / game2
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
2.25Goals allowed / game1
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
34%Average possession48%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
4Shots on target / game5
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game13.67
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
4Shots on target5
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
11.5%Shot conversion14.6%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
34%Possession48%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.35xG for1.72
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.48xG against1.27
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Shooting quality

Patro Eisden: BalancedAS Eupen: Efficient finishing
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
Accuracy (shots on target)31%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

AS Eupen is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.75 pts / game - Patro Eisden · 2 pts / game - AS Eupen

Patro Eisden
WLLL
Season result split
25% W0% D75% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-3
0.75 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
AS Eupen
WLW
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 33% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - Patro Eisden · 2 goals / game - AS Eupen

AS Eupen is 125% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.25 goals / game - Patro Eisden · 1 goals / game - AS Eupen

Patro Eisden scoring profile: very strong

Patro Eisden scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 games), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).

6Goals scored (season)6
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
9Goals conceded (season)3
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
3.75Average goals per game3
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
9Goals conceded (last 5)3
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
50%2 goals33%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0%3 goals33%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0%4 goals33%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal67%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
75%2 goals33%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
25%3 goals0%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
25%4 goals0%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time33%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
25%BTTS in both halves0%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
25%Scored in both halves33%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
100%BTTS - last 567%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / game - Patro Eisden · 0.67 pts / game - AS Eupen

Patro Eisden - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
AS Eupen - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per game (1st half)0.67
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0.25Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1Average goals (1st half)1
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
25%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
75%No goal before half-time67%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)2.33
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.25Goals scored (2nd half)1.67
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
2.75Average goals (2nd half)2
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
25%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0%No goal after half-time0%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Patro Eisden - second-half results

25% W25% D50% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AS Eupen - second-half results

67% W33% D0% L
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Patro Eisden - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.501.00
Goals scored / game0.31.3
Goals allowed / game0.81.5
Average goals per game1.02.8
1 goal75%100%
2 goals25%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet25%25%
No goal75%0%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 25% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 1
AS Eupen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.672.33
Goals scored / game0.31.7
Goals allowed / game0.70.3
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal67%100%
2 goals33%67%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal67%0%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 67% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
84%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-85%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.62
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.77
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Patro EisdenLigaAS Eupen
Average goals per game 3.753.09 3.00
Both teams scored 100%50% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%62% 67%
Clean sheets 0%26% 33%
Goal before half-time 75%79% 67%
Goal after half-time 100%85% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.71
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AS EupenYellow cardIhor Plastun
  2. Patro EisdenYellow cardZakaria Atteri
  3. AS EupenYellow cardMathias Fixelles
  4. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Rento TakaokaOff: Tsubasa Kasayanagi
  5. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Jeremy Loteteka BokilaOff: Kevin Kis
  6. AS EupenSubstitutionOn: Karol Lorenzo Youndje SihomOff: Amadou Keita
  7. AS EupenGoalBertan ÇalışkanAssist: Isaac Nuhu
  8. Patro EisdenGoalIsaias Del PupoAssist: Lars Dietz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Patro Eisden's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against AS Eupen. Games average 0.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
0 : 1
KAS Eupen
KAS Eupen
0 : 0
Patro Eisden Maasmechelen

FAQ

What was the result of Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?

The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 1:2 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Patro Eisden and AS Eupen?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Patro Eisden won 0, AS Eupen won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?

Patro Eisden score 1.50 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 2.00. The First Division B average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Patro Eisden's matches and 67% of AS Eupen's.

What form are Patro Eisden and AS Eupen in?

Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 1-0-3 record (0.75 points per game) and AS Eupen 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.