Pendikspor vs Amed: match statistics
Pendikspor displays impressive home form with a 64% win rate at their stadium and a +17 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on home soil. Amed, despite being the league leaders, has significantly weaker away statistics - with only a 36% win rate and a high 45% loss rate on the road, which is a clear weakness for the team. The recent form of both sides is mixed; however, Pendikspor scores an average of 2 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.45, whereas Amed concedes an average of 1.73 goals away. A key factor is that Amed fails to score in 36% of their away matches, which could be problematic against a Pendikspor defense that keeps clean sheets in 64% of their home games. Considering the hosts' strong home performances and the visitors' away struggles, I expect a closely contested match with a slight edge for Pendikspor, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.
Pendikspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pendikspor played against Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The game was played on February 7, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Pendikspor has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Amed has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Pendikspor scores 1.48 goals per game and allows 0.83. Amed scores 2.22 and allows 1.22. Games in this league average 2.88 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Pendikspor's games and 57% of Amed's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 70%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Amed has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.43 per game. Pendikspor takes 12.9 shots per game, while Amed takes 15.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Pendikspor leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 1.04 goals per game after halftime. Amed leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.22 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pendikspor's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Amed, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Lig games average 2.88 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pendikspor displays impressive home form with a 64% win rate at their stadium and a +17 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on home soil. Amed, despite being the league leaders, has significantly weaker away statistics - with only a 36% win rate and a high 45% loss rate on the road, which is a clear weakness for the team. The recent form of both sides is mixed; however, Pendikspor scores an average of 2 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.45, whereas Amed concedes an average of 1.73 goals away. A key factor is that Amed fails to score in 36% of their away matches, which could be problematic against a Pendikspor defense that keeps clean sheets in 64% of their home games. Considering the hosts' strong home performances and the visitors' away struggles, I expect a closely contested match with a slight edge for Pendikspor, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pendikspor | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Amed is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Pendikspor · 2 pts / game - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.48 goals / game - Pendikspor · 2.22 goals / game - Amed
Pendikspor is 47% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - Pendikspor · 1.22 goals / game - Amed
Pendikspor scores in 74% of games (17 of 23 meczów), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 meczów).
Amed scores in 78% of games (18 of 23 meczów), while Pendikspor keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pendikspor
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - Pendikspor · 1.7 pts / game - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pendikspor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Amed - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 61%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pendikspor
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Pendikspor | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.30 | 2.88 | ▲ 3.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 50% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 54% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 29% | • 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 71% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 81% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Pendikspor's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Amed. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Pendikspor vs Amed?
The 1. Lig match finished Pendikspor 0:2 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pendikspor vs Amed?
Pendikspor score 1.48 goals per game on average and Amed 2.22. The 1. Lig average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Pendikspor's matches and 57% of Amed's.
What form are Pendikspor and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Pendikspor have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Amed 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pendikspor vs Amed?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.