Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 22 July 2026

Pendikspor vs Amed: match statistics

Pendikspor crest
Pendikspor
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Amed crest
Amed
140%(2.90)
X35%(3.20)
225%(2.30)

Pendikspor displays impressive home form with a 64% win rate at their stadium and a +17 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on home soil. Amed, despite being the league leaders, has significantly weaker away statistics - with only a 36% win rate and a high 45% loss rate on the road, which is a clear weakness for the team. The recent form of both sides is mixed; however, Pendikspor scores an average of 2 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.45, whereas Amed concedes an average of 1.73 goals away. A key factor is that Amed fails to score in 36% of their away matches, which could be problematic against a Pendikspor defense that keeps clean sheets in 64% of their home games. Considering the hosts' strong home performances and the visitors' away struggles, I expect a closely contested match with a slight edge for Pendikspor, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.

Pendikspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pendikspor play Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match date is 7 February 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Pendikspor: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Amed: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pendikspor scores 1.49 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Amed scores 2.13 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pendikspor 44%, Amed 55%. Over 2.5: Pendikspor 33%, Amed 58%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.50. Pendikspor: 13.2 shots per match, Amed: 15.5.

Match halves

Pendikspor: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.92. Amed: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.16.

Goals by minute

Pendikspor: 76-90+ (17 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Pendikspor displays impressive home form with a 64% win rate at their stadium and a +17 goal difference, making them a formidable opponent on home soil. Amed, despite being the league leaders, has significantly weaker away statistics - with only a 36% win rate and a high 45% loss rate on the road, which is a clear weakness for the team. The recent form of both sides is mixed; however, Pendikspor scores an average of 2 goals per match at home while conceding only 0.45, whereas Amed concedes an average of 1.73 goals away. A key factor is that Amed fails to score in 36% of their away matches, which could be problematic against a Pendikspor defense that keeps clean sheets in 64% of their home games. Considering the hosts' strong home performances and the visitors' away struggles, I expect a closely contested match with a slight edge for Pendikspor, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
PendiksporAmed
11Shots18
PendiksporAmed
2Shots on target5
PendiksporAmed
1.23xG1.88
PendiksporAmed
2Corners5
PendiksporAmed
54Dangerous attacks55
PendiksporAmed
15Fouls13
PendiksporAmed
3Cards3
PendiksporAmed

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.49Goals scored / match2.13
PendiksporAmed
0.9Goals conceded / match1.11
PendiksporAmed
52%Average possession53%
PendiksporAmed
4.77Shots on target / match5.61
PendiksporAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.18Shots per match15.5
PendiksporAmed
4.77Shots on target5.61
PendiksporAmed
11.3%Shot conversion13.8%
PendiksporAmed
52%Possession53%
PendiksporAmed
1.5xG for1.71
PendiksporAmed
1.12xG against1.15
PendiksporAmed

Shooting quality

Pendikspor: BalancedAmed: Attacking
PendiksporAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pendikspor is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Pendikspor · 0.8 pts / match - Amed

Pendikspor
DDWDL
Season result split
41% W38% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-15-8
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-6-3
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Amed
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W29% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-11-6
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-6-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

1.49 goals / match - Pendikspor · 2.13 goals / match - Amed

Pendikspor is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.9 goals / match - Pendikspor · 1.11 goals / match - Amed

Pendikspor scoring profile: strong

Pendikspor scores in 72% of matches (28 of 39 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).

Amed scoring profile: strong

Amed scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Pendikspor keeps a clean sheet in 44% (17 of 39 matches).

58Goals scored (season)81
PendiksporAmed
35Goals conceded (season)42
PendiksporAmed
2.38Average goals in match3.24
PendiksporAmed
5Goals scored (last 5)7
PendiksporAmed
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
PendiksporAmed

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal84%
PendiksporAmed
41%2 goals58%
PendiksporAmed
21%3 goals29%
PendiksporAmed
13%4 goals18%
PendiksporAmed

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal66%
PendiksporAmed
23%2 goals32%
PendiksporAmed
8%3 goals11%
PendiksporAmed
3%4 goals3%
PendiksporAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time26%
PendiksporAmed
0%BTTS in both halves11%
PendiksporAmed
21%Scored in both halves37%
PendiksporAmed

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
PendiksporAmed
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
PendiksporAmed
60%BTTS - last 580%
PendiksporAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
PendiksporAmed
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
PendiksporAmed
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
PendiksporAmed

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
PendiksporAmed
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
PendiksporAmed
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
PendiksporAmed

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - Pendikspor · 1.71 pts / match - Amed

Pendikspor - half-time state
23% leading59% draw18% trailing
Amed - half-time state
42% leading45% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.71
PendiksporAmed
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.97
PendiksporAmed
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
PendiksporAmed
1Average goals (1st half)1.45
PendiksporAmed
64%Clean sheet before half-time63%
PendiksporAmed
59%No goal before half-time42%
PendiksporAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.71
PendiksporAmed
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)1.16
PendiksporAmed
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
PendiksporAmed
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.79
PendiksporAmed
69%Clean sheet after half-time53%
PendiksporAmed
49%No goal after half-time37%
PendiksporAmed

Pendikspor - second-half results

44% W36% R21% P
50
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
65
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amed - second-half results

47% W29% R24% P
65
Half-time points
37
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
65
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pendikspor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pendikspor
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
10
6
16-30
10
8
31-45
11
7
46-60
8
2
61-75
17
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Amed
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
12
7
16-30
18
8
31-45
16
2
46-60
9
9
61-75
19
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.81
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pendikspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-22.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
170%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

PendiksporLigaAmed
Average goals in match 2.382.92 3.24
Both teams scored 44%50% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%54% 58%
Clean sheets 44%29% 34%
Goal before half-time 59%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 67%80% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pendikspor 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü
2 : 1
Pendik Spor Kulübü

FAQ

What was the result of Pendikspor vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished Pendikspor 0:2 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pendikspor vs Amed?

Pendikspor score 1.49 goals per game on average and Amed 2.13. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Pendikspor's matches and 55% of Amed's.

What form are Pendikspor and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Pendikspor have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Amed 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pendikspor vs Amed?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.