Persik Kediri vs Arema: match statistics
Persik Kediri vs Arema: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Persik Kediri played against Arema in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on May 3, 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Persik Kediri has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Arema has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Persik Kediri scores 1.17 goals per game and allows 1.70. Arema scores 1.33 and allows 1.37. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 70% of Persik Kediri's games and 63% of Arema's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 57%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Persik Kediri has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.39 per game. Persik Kediri takes 11.2 shots per game, while Arema takes 11.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Persik Kediri leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Arema leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.90 after halftime.
When the teams score
Persik Kediri's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Arema, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Persik to win (1): at home they average 1.53 goals per match with xG 1.67 and maintain 57% possession, whereas Arema away averages only 1.07 goals and xG 1.32 with 45% possession. Persik creates more high-quality chances — 12.53 shots per match, including 5.13 on target and 12% conversion, versus Arema’s 11.33 shots, 3.8 on target and 9% conversion on the road. Recent form over the last five matches favors the visitors (Arema: 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss, averaging 1.6 points per match), while Persik has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses (0.8 points per match), which reduces but does not eliminate the home advantage. Defensively Persik concedes 1.27 goals at home with xG against 1.32, while Arema concedes 1.13 goals away but with a higher xG against of 1.78, indicating Arema allows more dangerous opportunities. Considering the season totals (Persik 35 scored/51 conceded, Arema 40/41) and Persik’s superior home metrics, I give the hosts the higher probability.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'both teams to score' scenario looks more likely: Persik has BTTS at 67% this season and Arema at 60%, both above the league average of 54%. Persik averages 1.6 goals per game (xG 1.46), Arema 1.07 goals (xG 1.32), while Arema concedes as much as 1.78 xG per game, increasing the likelihood of conceding. Recent form cools the signal: in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred for Persik in 40% and for Arema in 20%, and both teams scored a total of 3 and 4 goals respectively across those five games. Considering the seasonal 67%/60% BTTS, higher attacking xG (1.46 and 1.32) and the fact Persik averages 4.33 shots on target with a 13% conversion rate, I assign 65% to BTTS - Yes and 35% to No as the most justified outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and shot statistics indicate significant goal potential: Persik has xG_for 1.46 and averages 11.87 shots (4.33 on target) with a 13% conversion, Arema has xG_for 1.32 and 11.33 shots (3.8 on target) with a 9% conversion. From this I estimate expected goals of 1.62 for Persik and 1.33 for Arema, totaling 2.95 xG. Seasonal over metrics confirm this picture: Persik scored over 1.5 goals in 87% of matches, Arema in 73% (average 80%), and the league averages 2.72 goals per game, so I rate Over 1.5 at about 84%. Over 2.5 has moderate support (Persik 73% vs Arema 40%, average 56.5%) and given 2.95 xG I give it roughly a 60% chance; Over 3.5 is unlikely (Persik 33% and Arema 20%, average 26.5%), I rate it around 29%. Based on this I recommend betting Over 1.5, because Persik’s high finishing rate (conversion 13%), the combined xG of 2.95 and the seasonal rates 87%/73% provide the strongest signal compared to higher lines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Persik led at the break in 6 matches (40%) and has a first-half goals average of 0.6 versus 0.27 for Arema, giving the hosts the advantage at halftime. However, in second halves the hosts score an average of 1.0 and concede 1.13 (a −0.13 balance), while the visitors score 0.8 and concede 0.53, and the second-half balance is −2 for Persik versus +4 for Arema, indicating significant visitor activity after the break. Additionally, Arema records 47% draws on the road and in the last 5 matches has 40% wins and 40% draws, i.e. they often pick up points late on. Considering the hosts’ higher xG of 1.46 versus 1.32 and better shot conversion 13% versus 9%, the most likely scenario is Persik leading at the break and the match ending level (1/X).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Persik Kediri | Arema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Arema is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Persik Kediri · 1.6 pts / game - Arema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arema is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1.17 goals / game - Persik Kediri · 1.33 goals / game - Arema
Arema is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.7 goals / game - Persik Kediri · 1.37 goals / game - Arema
Persik Kediri scores in 77% of games (23 of 30 meczów), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 30 meczów).
Arema scores in 80% of games (24 of 30 meczów), while Persik Kediri keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persik Kediri
Over / Under - Arema
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persik Kediri - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Arema - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Persik Kediri
Arema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Persik Kediri | Liga | Arema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.87 | 2.74 | • 2.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 54% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 53% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 10% | 26% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 70% | • 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Persik Kediri's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Arema. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Persik Kediri vs Arema?
The Liga 1 match finished Persik Kediri 3:2 Arema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persik Kediri vs Arema?
Persik Kediri score 1.17 goals per game on average and Arema 1.33. The Liga 1 average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Persik Kediri's matches and 63% of Arema's.
What form are Persik Kediri and Arema in?
Over the last 5 games Persik Kediri have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Arema 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persik Kediri vs Arema?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


