Arema vs Persik Kediri: match statistics
Despite a dip in form over the last five matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses), Arema displays superior offensive statistics at home, averaging 1.5 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.45. Persik Kediri performs significantly worse on the road, scoring just 0.89 goals on average with an xG of 1.19, while conceding 1.78 goals per match. The visitors' form is alarming—in their last five fixtures, they have recorded only 1 draw and 4 losses, conceding 11 goals. Although Arema holds a negative home record this season (25% win rate, 63% loss rate), their advantage in possession (53%) and superior efficiency (13% shot conversion rate) against a visiting side with a porous defense gives them a solid chance of victory. Considering all factors, the hosts are the favorites for this encounter.
Arema vs Persik Kediri: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Arema played against Persik Kediri in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on January 11, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Arema has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Persik Kediri has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Arema scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 1.38. Persik Kediri scores 1.13 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 81% of Arema's games and 75% of Persik Kediri's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 56%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.38 per game. Arema takes 11.3 shots per game, while Persik Kediri takes 10.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Arema leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.81 goals per game after halftime. Persik Kediri leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.63 after halftime.
When the teams score
Arema's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Persik Kediri, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Despite a dip in form over the last five matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses), Arema displays superior offensive statistics at home, averaging 1.5 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.45. Persik Kediri performs significantly worse on the road, scoring just 0.89 goals on average with an xG of 1.19, while conceding 1.78 goals per match. The visitors' form is alarming—in their last five fixtures, they have recorded only 1 draw and 4 losses, conceding 11 goals. Although Arema holds a negative home record this season (25% win rate, 63% loss rate), their advantage in possession (53%) and superior efficiency (13% shot conversion rate) against a visiting side with a porous defense gives them a solid chance of victory. Considering all factors, the hosts are the favorites for this encounter.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Arema | Persik Kediri | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Persik Kediri is 133% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Arema · 1.4 pts / game - Persik Kediri
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arema is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
1.31 goals / game - Arema · 1.13 goals / game - Persik Kediri
Arema is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.38 goals / game - Arema · 1.5 goals / game - Persik Kediri
Arema scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 meczów), while Persik Kediri keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 meczów).
Persik Kediri scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 meczów), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Arema
Over / Under - Persik Kediri
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persik Kediri is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / game - Arema · 1.44 pts / game - Persik Kediri
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Arema - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 25%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Persik Kediri - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Arema
Persik Kediri
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Arema | Liga | Persik Kediri | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.69 | 2.58 | • 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 81% | 55% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 49% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 26% | ▼ 6% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 66% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 84% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Arema vs Persik Kediri?
The Liga 1 match finished Arema 2:1 Persik Kediri. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Arema vs Persik Kediri?
Arema score 1.31 goals per game on average and Persik Kediri 1.13. The Liga 1 average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 81% of Arema's matches and 75% of Persik Kediri's.
What form are Arema and Persik Kediri in?
Over the last 5 games Arema have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Persik Kediri 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arema vs Persik Kediri?
The statistical background for Arema vs Persik Kediri — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.