Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of September 13, 2026

Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

135%(2.14)
X35%(3.20)
230%(2.99)

Persik Kediri displays catastrophic form in their last five matches (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses), which significantly weakens their position despite a decent home record (56% wins). PSIM Yogyakarta sits higher in the table (7th place vs 11th) and possesses better overall form (7 points in the last 5 matches vs 1 point for the hosts). The visitor shows solid efficiency on the road (40% wins, 40% clean sheets), though their recent away form is mixed. xG statistics are close for both teams, suggesting an even quality of play. Considering the hosts' form crisis, but their historical strength at home and the guests' stability on the road, a draw or a narrow victory for one of the sides seems most probable.

Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Persik Kediri played against PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on February 13, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

Persik Kediri has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. PSIM Yogyakarta has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Persik Kediri scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.65. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.20 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 2.54 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Persik Kediri's games and 45% of PSIM Yogyakarta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 45%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.36 per game. Persik Kediri takes 10.5 shots per game, while PSIM Yogyakarta takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Persik Kediri leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.55 goals per game after halftime. PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.85 after halftime.

When the teams score

Persik Kediri's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For PSIM Yogyakarta, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.54 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Persik Kediri displays catastrophic form in their last five matches (0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses), which significantly weakens their position despite a decent home record (56% wins). PSIM Yogyakarta sits higher in the table (7th place vs 11th) and possesses better overall form (7 points in the last 5 matches vs 1 point for the hosts). The visitor shows solid efficiency on the road (40% wins, 40% clean sheets), though their recent away form is mixed. xG statistics are close for both teams, suggesting an even quality of play. Considering the hosts' form crisis, but their historical strength at home and the guests' stability on the road, a draw or a narrow victory for one of the sides seems most probable.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
12Shots8
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
5Shots on target3
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.56xG1.2
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
2Corners2
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
61Dangerous attacks66
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
6Fouls16
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
2Cards4
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.2Goals scored / game1.2
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.65Goals allowed / game1.15
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
53%Average possession59%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
3.85Shots on target / game4.5
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.5Shots per game13
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
3.85Shots on target4.5
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
11.4%Shot conversion9.2%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
53%Possession59%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.36xG for1.57
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.53xG against1.4
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Persik Kediri: BalancedPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Persik Kediri
DLLWW
Season result split
35% W20% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-9
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
PSIM Yogyakarta
WWLLD
Season result split
40% W35% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-5
1.55 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.65 goals / game - Persik Kediri · 1.15 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta

Persik Kediri scoring profile: strong

Persik Kediri scores in 80% of games (16 of 20 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 meczów).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while Persik Kediri keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 meczów).

24Goals scored (season)24
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
33Goals conceded (season)23
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
2.85Average goals per game2.35
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal75%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
35%2 goals35%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
5%3 goals10%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
0%4 goals0%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal60%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
45%2 goals35%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
20%3 goals15%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
5%4 goals5%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time10%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
5%Scored in both halves15%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
80%BTTS - last 520%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Persik Kediri is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - Persik Kediri · 1.1 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta

Persik Kediri - half-time state
35% leading45% draw20% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)1.1
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.75
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
75%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
65%No goal before half-time75%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

0.65Points per game (2nd half)1.65
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.6
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
10%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta
50%No goal after half-time35%
Persik KediriPSIM Yogyakarta

Persik Kediri - second-half results

10% W35% D55% L
30
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

45% W30% D25% L
22
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Persik Kediri - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.20
Goals scored / game1.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Persik Kediri
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
3
31-45
1
7
46-60
4
9
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
7
3
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Persik Kediri

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
149%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

Persik KediriLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals per game 2.852.54 2.35
Both teams scored 75%52% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%48% 45%
Clean sheets 5%27% 40%
Goal before half-time 55%67% 50%
Goal after half-time 95%82% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.54
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / game
1.11
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Persik KediriYellow cardRendy Sanjaya
  2. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardJop van den Avert
  3. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardRiyatno Abiyoso
  4. PSIM YogyakartaGoalNolberto Ezequiel VidalAssist: Cahya Supriadi
  5. Persik KediriYellow cardImanol García Lugea
  6. Persik KediriGoalEzra Walian
  7. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Andi IrfanOff: Riyatno Abiyoso
  8. Persik KediriSubstitutionOn: Henhen HerdianaOff: Rendy Sanjaya
  9. Persik KediriSubstitutionOn: Rodrigo da Silva DiasOff: José Enrique Rodríguez
  10. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardDomenico Savio Sheva Maresca Amavisca
  11. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Deri Anthony CorfeOff: Nolberto Ezequiel Vidal
  12. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardYusaku Yamadera

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Persik Kediri's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against PSIM Yogyakarta. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

PSIM Yogyakarta
2 : 1
Persik Kediri

FAQ

What was the result of Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished Persik Kediri 2:2 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Persik Kediri score 1.20 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.20. The Liga 1 average is 2.54 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Persik Kediri's matches and 45% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Persik Kediri and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Persik Kediri have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persik Kediri vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.