Persita vs Persijap: match statistics
Persita vs Persijap: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Persita played against Persijap in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
Persita has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Persijap has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Persita scores 1.16 goals per game and allows 0.97. Persijap scores 0.90 and allows 1.45. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 35% of Persita's games and 45% of Persijap's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 48%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Persijap has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.26 per game. Persita takes 10.2 shots per game, while Persijap takes 11.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Persita leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Persijap leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.52 after halftime.
When the teams score
Persita's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Persijap, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Persita have a 53% home win rate, score 1.47 goals and concede only 0.73 on average with home xG 1.52 and opponent xG 1.41, indicating a solid defense and moderate chance creation. Persijap win only 13% of away matches, average 0.73 goals scored and 1.73 conceded, despite away xG of 1.35 — they create opportunities but convert poorly (conversion rate around 7%). In the last 5 matches the visitors have 3 wins and average 1.8 points per game, while Persita have only 1 win and 0.6 points per game, giving Persijap some momentum but not offsetting their weak away efficiency. Considering goal difference (+11 Persita at home vs -15 Persijap away) I assign Persita a 60% chance, 20% draw and 20% for Persijap.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Persita scores on average 1.06 goals per game, while Persijap averages 0.73; defensively Persita concedes 1.19 goals per game versus 1.73 conceded by Persijap, indicating both teams are susceptible to conceding, particularly Persijap. xG suggests similar offensive potential: Persita 1.44 xG vs Persijap 1.35 xG, and opponents generate 1.42 and 1.49 xG against them; average shots 12.0 vs 10.67 and shots on target 4.31 vs 4.0 show chance availability. However, recent trends are decisive — seasonal BTTS share is 50% for Persita and 40% for Persijap, but in the last 5 matches Persita has 0% BTTS and only 0.2 goals per game (1 goal in 5), while Persijap has 20% BTTS and 1.2 goals per game (6 goals in 5). Additionally, Persijap fails to score in 53% of season matches, and Persita has 31% clean sheets this season, which together strongly reduce the probability of Goal/Goal. Based on this I assign 30% probability to BTTS - Yes and 70% to BTTS - No, making the 'No' selection the strongest signal from the provided data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG estimates and attack/defense balance suggest about 1.47 goals for Persita (xG for 1.44 vs xG against Persijap 1.49) and 1.38 for Persijap (xG for 1.35 vs xG against Persita 1.42), totaling ~2.85 expected goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.85 yields probabilities: >1.5 ≈78%, >2.5 ≈54% and >3.5 ≈32%. Seasonal rates confirm this tempo — Persita has 81% of matches over 1.5 and 50% over 2.5, Persijap 73% and 47%, and both teams record 88%/87% of matches with at least one goal. In the last 5 fixtures Persijap scored 6 goals (avg. 1.2) versus Persita’s 1 goal (0.2), with averages of 12.0 vs 10.67 shots and 4.31 vs 4.0 on target, which supports a goals scenario. I conclude the strongest and safest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation: Over at the 1.5 line); Over 2.5 has a moderate edge, while Over 3.5 is too risky.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the match is most often level – Persita were drawing at the break in 44% of their games and Persijap in 47%, which provides a strong signal for X in the first half. Nevertheless Persita post superior full-match statistics: the hosts win 38% of fixtures versus 13% for Persijap, score on average 1.06 goals per game versus 0.73, have higher xG (1.44 vs 1.35) and register more shots (12.0 vs 10.67). The hosts lead at the break in 31% of matches, while the visitors lead in only 25%, and the second half frequently produces goals (Persita record over 0.5 second-half goals in 88% of matches), which increases the chance to maintain or engineer a turnaround. On this basis the strongest scenario is Persita leading at half-time and the hosts winning at full-time (1/1), although a half-time draw with a later home victory (X/1) also has a high probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Persita | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Persijap is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Persita · 1.8 pts / game - Persijap
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Persita is 29% better for: goals scored per game.
1.16 goals / game - Persita · 0.9 goals / game - Persijap
Persita is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.97 goals / game - Persita · 1.45 goals / game - Persijap
Persita scores in 55% of games (17 of 31 meczów), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 meczów).
Persijap scores in 58% of games (18 of 31 meczów), while Persita keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persita
Over / Under - Persijap
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persita is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.23 pts / game - Persita · 1.03 pts / game - Persijap
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persita - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Persijap - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Persita
Persijap
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Persita | Liga | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.13 | 2.73 | ▼ 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 35% | 52% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 35% | 53% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | • 26% | 27% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 71% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 82% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Persita's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Persijap. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Persita vs Persijap?
The Liga 1 match finished Persita 0:3 Persijap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persita vs Persijap?
Persita score 1.16 goals per game on average and Persijap 0.90. The Liga 1 average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Persita's matches and 45% of Persijap's.
What form are Persita and Persijap in?
Over the last 5 games Persita have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Persijap 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persita vs Persijap?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.