Pharco vs Coca-Cola: match statistics
Pharco vs Coca-Cola: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pharco played against Coca-Cola in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on May 12, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Pharco has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Coca-Cola has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Pharco scores 0.45 goals per game and allows 1.07. Coca-Cola scores 0.79 and allows 1.03. Games in this league average 1.98 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 31% of Pharco's games and 48% of Coca-Cola's. The Over 2.5 rates are 10% and 34%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Coca-Cola has the higher season xG average, 1.17 to 1.13 per game. Pharco takes 9.7 shots per game, while Coca-Cola takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Pharco leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.28 goals per game after halftime. Coca-Cola leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.52 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pharco's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Coca-Cola, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 1.98 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pharco score only 0.43 goals per home match (13 goals this season) with an average xG of 1.23 and a very low conversion rate of just 4%, resulting in them failing to score in 64% of home games. Coca‑Cola have 23 goals this season and average 0.79 goals away with xG 1.08 and a higher conversion of around 9%; in their last five away matches they recorded 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, averaging 1 point per game. The hosts’ defense looks more solid at home — Pharco concede on average 0.86 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 36% of games, while Coca‑Cola concede 1.14 goals away and keep a clean sheet in 21% of matches, which suggests a low‑scoring game. Additionally Pharco generate more shots (10.36) and more shots on target (3.29) than Coca (8.93 and 2.57), but their efficiency is significantly lower, neutralizing this chance‑creation advantage. Considering the hosts’ poor form (last 5: 0 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses and 0.4 points on average) and the visitors’ higher efficiency, the most likely outcome is a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick BTTS - No. Both teams show low goal output: Pharco average 0.8 goals/home match, Coca‑Cola 0.79, and the league averages only 1.98 goals per game. Coca‑Cola failed to score in 50% of their matches this season, Pharco in 33%. In the last 5 rounds BTTS rates were 20% for home sides and 40% for away sides, indicating a trend against both teams scoring. Although xG indicates some offensive potential (home xG 1.26 vs away xG 1.08), actual goals are lower (0.8 and 0.79), meaning Pharco is wasting about 0.46 xG and Coca‑Cola about 0.29 xG per match, which reduces the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Additionally Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 47% of home games and the league BTTS rate is 46%, all favoring No Goal. Given the high no-score rates (50% for the visitors), low goal averages and recent form, I assess BTTS 'No' at 70% vs 'Yes' 30%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams score infrequently: Pharco averages 0.80 goals per match, Coca‑Cola 0.79, with Pharco registering 10.67 shots and 3.07 on target, and Coca‑Cola 8.93 and 2.57. xG indicates higher potential (xG_for 1.26 for Pharco and 1.08 for Coca‑Cola), and averaging xG_attack versus xG_defense (xG_against away 1.40, home 1.15) yields a projection of ~1.33 goals for the home side and ~1.11 for the away, totaling ~2.44. Historically over 2.5 is uncommon: Pharco has over 2.5 in 33% of matches, Coca‑Cola in 36% (average ~35% over 2.5 → ~65% under 2.5). The strongest signal is under 3.5: Pharco has over 3.5 in only 20% of games, Coca‑Cola in 0%, which translates to roughly a 90% probability of below 3.5; therefore I recommend Under 3.5 as the safest line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time a draw is the most likely outcome: hosts led at the break in 2 matches (13%), were level in 10 matches (67%), and visitors led at the break in 5 matches (36%); average goals at the break are 0.13 for hosts and 0.43 for visitors, and season clean sheet percentages at half-time are 80% (hosts) and 86% (visitors), indicating a low number of first-half goals. Over the full-time result a draw also appears the strongest scenario: hosts win only 13% of matches, visitors 29%, and hosts record 67% draws across the season, favoring X/X as the final outcome. In the last 5 matches the hosts’ form is llldd with 0% of games leading at the break, while the visitors led at the break in 40% of their last 5, suggesting visitors more often gain a lead but do not necessarily convert it into a win. Additionally, xG shows a slight advantage for the hosts (xG_for 1.26 versus 1.08 for visitors) and greater defensive vulnerability for the visitors (xG_against 1.15 for hosts vs 1.40 for visitors), which together suggest an even, low-scoring match finishing in a draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pharco | Coca-Cola | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.16 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Coca-Cola is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Pharco · 1 pts / game - Coca-Cola
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Coca-Cola is 76% better for: goals scored per game.
0.45 goals / game - Pharco · 0.79 goals / game - Coca-Cola
Pharco scores in 38% of games (11 of 29 meczów), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 meczów).
Coca-Cola scores in 59% of games (17 of 29 meczów), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 28% (8 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pharco
Over / Under - Coca-Cola
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Coca-Cola is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.93 pts / game - Pharco · 1.31 pts / game - Coca-Cola
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Coca-Cola - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 21%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pharco
Coca-Cola
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pharco | Liga | Coca-Cola | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.52 | 1.98 | ▼ 1.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 46% | ▲ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 10% | 33% | • 34% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 28% | 35% | • 34% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 52% | 56% | ▼ 41% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 66% | 69% | • 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Pharco's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Coca-Cola. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Pharco vs Coca-Cola?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pharco 0:1 Coca-Cola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pharco vs Coca-Cola?
Pharco score 0.45 goals per game on average and Coca-Cola 0.79. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Pharco's matches and 48% of Coca-Cola's.
What form are Pharco and Coca-Cola in?
Over the last 5 games Pharco have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Coca-Cola 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pharco vs Coca-Cola?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.