Pharco vs Coca-Cola: match statistics
Pharco vs Coca-Cola: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Pharco play Coca-Cola in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 12 May 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Pharco: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Coca-Cola: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Pharco scores 0.45 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Coca-Cola scores 0.79 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.02 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Pharco 30%, Coca-Cola 48%. Over 2.5: Pharco 12%, Coca-Cola 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Coca-Cola has higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.12. Pharco: 9.6 shots per match, Coca-Cola: 10.3.
Match halves
Pharco: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.24. Coca-Cola: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.55.
Goals by minute
Pharco: 76-90+ (4 goals). Coca-Cola: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Pharco score only 0.43 goals per home match (13 goals this season) with an average xG of 1.23 and a very low conversion rate of just 4%, resulting in them failing to score in 64% of home games. Coca‑Cola have 23 goals this season and average 0.79 goals away with xG 1.08 and a higher conversion of around 9%; in their last five away matches they recorded 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, averaging 1 point per game. The hosts’ defense looks more solid at home — Pharco concede on average 0.86 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 36% of games, while Coca‑Cola concede 1.14 goals away and keep a clean sheet in 21% of matches, which suggests a low‑scoring game. Additionally Pharco generate more shots (10.36) and more shots on target (3.29) than Coca (8.93 and 2.57), but their efficiency is significantly lower, neutralizing this chance‑creation advantage. Considering the hosts’ poor form (last 5: 0 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses and 0.4 points on average) and the visitors’ higher efficiency, the most likely outcome is a draw.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Pharco | Coca-Cola | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.16 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Coca-Cola is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Pharco · 1.2 pts / match - Coca-Cola
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Coca-Cola is 76% better for: goals scored per match.
0.45 goals / match - Pharco · 0.79 goals / match - Coca-Cola
Pharco scores in 36% of matches (12 of 33 matches), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).
Coca-Cola scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Pharco
Over / Under — Coca-Cola
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Coca-Cola is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.97 pts / match - Pharco · 1.21 pts / match - Coca-Cola
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 12%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Coca-Cola - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Pharco
Coca-Cola
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pharco | Liga | Coca-Cola | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.52 | 2.02 | ▼ 1.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 47% | • 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 12% | 34% | • 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 35% | • 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 52% | 58% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 70% | • 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Pharco 0 - 1 - 0 Coca-Cola. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Pharco vs Coca-Cola?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pharco 0:1 Coca-Cola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pharco vs Coca-Cola?
Pharco score 0.45 goals per game on average and Coca-Cola 0.79. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Pharco's matches and 48% of Coca-Cola's.
What form are Pharco and Coca-Cola in?
Over the last 5 games Pharco have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Coca-Cola 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pharco vs Coca-Cola?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.