Pharco vs Ghazl El Mehalla: match statistics
Pharco vs Ghazl El Mehalla: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pharco played against Ghazl El Mehalla in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Pharco has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Ghazl El Mehalla has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Pharco scores 0.43 goals per game and allows 1.10. Ghazl El Mehalla scores 0.62 and allows 0.76. Games in this league average 2.00 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Pharco's games and 33% of Ghazl El Mehalla's. The Over 2.5 rates are 10% and 24%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.02 per game. Pharco takes 8.6 shots per game, while Ghazl El Mehalla takes 8.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Pharco leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.24 goals per game after halftime. Ghazl El Mehalla leads at halftime in 10% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pharco's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Ghazl El Mehalla, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 2.00 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pharco (20th) have scored 9 goals this season and average just 0.2 goals per home game, failing to score in 80% of their home matches, indicating serious finishing issues. Ghazl El Mehalla (16th) have 13 goals this season and score 0.9 goals on the road on average, with a shot conversion rate of ~11% versus 2% for the hosts, giving the visitors an edge in finalization. At the same time Pharco concede only 0.8 goals per home match whereas Ghazl concede 1.1 away, and average xG is 1.09 for the hosts and 1.02 for the visitors, suggesting both teams create a similar number of chances. Both sides are without a win in their last 5 matches (0W, 3D, 2L) and have drawn 50% of their home/away fixtures respectively, which further supports a share of points. Therefore I forecast a draw as the most likely outcome (50%), with 30% probability for an away win and 20% for a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Pharco has a seasonal BTTS of 27% and kept a clean sheet in 73% of matches, while Ghazl El Mehalla has BTTS 40% and CS 50%, which favors a No Goal scenario. Pharco has scored only 9 goals this season (avg 0.36), and Ghazl 13 goals (avg 0.9), so both teams show limited scoring threat. Both teams’ xG are similar (1.03 vs 1.02), but xG against is 1.29 for Pharco and 1.44 for Ghazl, and the hosts’ shot conversion is only 4% versus 11% for the visitors, meaning Pharco rarely converts chances. In the last 5 matches both teams had BTTS in 40% of games, scoring 2 and conceding 5 (Pharco) and 6 (Ghazl) respectively, which further supports a low frequency of Goal/Goal. Considering the hosts’ 73% clean sheets and Pharco’s low seasonal BTTS of 27%, I assess BTTS - No at 70% vs 30% for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect a low-scoring game: expected goals are ~0.50 for Pharco and 0.95 for Ghazl El Mehalla, totaling ~1.45 goals, so I recommend Over/Under: Under 2.5. The xG for both teams is 1.03 (Pharco) and 1.02 (Ghazl), but actual shot conversion is low — conversion rate 4% for Pharco and 11% for Ghazl, translating to seasonal goal averages of 0.36 and 0.90 respectively. In the last 5 matches Pharco scored 2 goals (0.4 per match) and Ghazl also 2 goals (0.4 per match); Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 73% of games, while both teams scored in only 27% of matches, which reduces the likelihood of a high-scoring game. Historical Over 2.5 rates are 9% for Pharco and 40% for Ghazl; given the low number of shots on target (about 2.0 per match each) and low conversion, I estimate the probability of Over 2.5 at ~18% (Under 82%), therefore Under 2.5 is the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to a draw at half-time: the home side were level at the break in 82% of matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 82), and the away side in 60% (drawingAtHTPercentage_away = 60), yielding an average of about a 71% chance of a half-time draw. Both teams have low goal averages and limited finishing efficiency — hosts score 0.36 goals per match with a conversion rate of 4%, visitors 0.9 goals with an 11% conversion, while both teams’ xG is similar: 1.03 vs 1.02, suggesting few chances are being taken. Additionally, the hosts kept a clean sheet at half-time in 91% of matches (seasonCSPercentageHT_home = 91) and have a season clean sheet rate of 73%, and BTTS is 27% for the hosts and 40% for the visitors, which reinforces the low-score draw scenario. Therefore my primary HT/FT pick is draw/draw (X/X) with an estimated probability of 43%, with a secondary scenario of draw/away (X/2) at 14% due to the higher average goals by visitors in the second half (AVG_2hg_away = 0.8 vs AVG_2hg_home = 0.45).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pharco | Ghazl El Mehalla | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.16 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ghazl El Mehalla is 44% better for: goals scored per game.
0.43 goals / game - Pharco · 0.62 goals / game - Ghazl El Mehalla
Ghazl El Mehalla is 45% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.1 goals / game - Pharco · 0.76 goals / game - Ghazl El Mehalla
Pharco scores in 38% of games (8 of 21 meczów), while Ghazl El Mehalla keeps a clean sheet in 62% (13 of 21 meczów).
Ghazl El Mehalla scores in 43% of games (9 of 21 meczów), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pharco
Over / Under - Ghazl El Mehalla
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ghazl El Mehalla - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 10%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pharco
Ghazl El Mehalla
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pharco | Liga | Ghazl El Mehalla | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.52 | 2.00 | ▼ 1.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 10% | 33% | ▼ 24% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 34% | ▲ 62% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 48% | 57% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 71% | ▼ 43% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Pharco's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Ghazl El Mehalla. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Pharco vs Ghazl El Mehalla?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pharco 1:1 Ghazl El Mehalla. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pharco vs Ghazl El Mehalla?
Pharco score 0.43 goals per game on average and Ghazl El Mehalla 0.62. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Pharco's matches and 33% of Ghazl El Mehalla's.
What form are Pharco and Ghazl El Mehalla in?
Over the last 5 games Pharco have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Ghazl El Mehalla 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pharco vs Ghazl El Mehalla?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


