United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 23 July 2026

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Detroit City FC: match statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Detroit City FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pittsburgh Riverhounds play Detroit City FC in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Detroit City FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.27 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Detroit City FC scores 1.53 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%, Detroit City FC 53%. Over 2.5: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%, Detroit City FC 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Detroit City FC has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.24. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 9.7 shots per match, Detroit City FC: 14.1.

Match halves

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.87. Detroit City FC: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (7 goals). Detroit City FC: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 3-3-0. Average goals 1.83, BTTS 17%.

Match description

I back the home win: Pittsburgh Riverhounds boast a 100% win rate at home, averaging 3.0 goals per home match and 0% matches without scoring. Detroit City FC sits higher in the table (6th vs 13th), has a better recent form in the last 5 (3 wins vs 2) and superior possession (59% vs home 40%), but they have no away wins (0% away wins) and average only 0.5 goals on the road. The key differential is finishing efficiency — the hosts convert 33% of attempts with an average of 4 shots on target at home, while the visitors convert just 4% despite averaging 13 shots away and have 50% of away matches without a goal. xG shows the visitors generate more expected chances (away xG 1.42 vs home xG 1.13), but this does not translate to goals, so the hosts’ efficiency is the decisive advantage. Considering the hosts’ 100% home form and the visitors’ poor conversion, estimated probabilities are 60% home, 20% draw, 20% away.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

32Possession (%)68
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
11Shots19
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
3Shots on target4
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
1.22xG2.01
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
4Corners9
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
43Dangerous attacks74
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
13Fouls10
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
4Cards1
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
1.27Goals scored / match1.53
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
1.2Goals conceded / match0.93
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
49%Average possession53%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
3.47Shots on target / match4.87
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.67Shots per match14.13
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
3.47Shots on target4.87
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
13.1%Shot conversion10.8%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
49%Possession53%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
1.24xG for1.64
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
1.29xG against1.26
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

Shooting quality

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: Efficient finishingDetroit City FC: Attacking
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Detroit City FC is 43% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 2 pts / match - Detroit City FC

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
WDLLW
Season result split
47% W13% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-6
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Detroit City FC
LDWWW
Season result split
53% W20% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-4
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.94Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Detroit City FC is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.53 goals / match - Detroit City FC

Detroit City FC is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 0.93 goals / match - Detroit City FC

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scoring profile: strong

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Detroit City FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

Detroit City FC scoring profile: very strong

Detroit City FC scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

19Goals scored (season)23
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
18Goals conceded (season)14
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
2.47Average goals in match2.47
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
5Goals scored (last 5)11
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal80%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
40%2 goals40%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
20%3 goals13%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
0%4 goals7%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal60%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
40%2 goals33%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
7%3 goals0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
0%4 goals0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 15 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time20%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
27%Scored in both halves27%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
40%BTTS - last 560%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.13 pts / match - Detroit City FC

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing
Detroit City FC - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.13
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
0.73Average goals (1st half)1.07
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
67%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
67%No goal before half-time67%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)2
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)1
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.4
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
40%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC
40%No goal after half-time27%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsDetroit City FC

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results

40% W27% R33% P
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Detroit City FC - second-half results

53% W40% R7% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding265%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.21.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Detroit City FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.2
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Detroit City FC
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Detroit City FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLigaDetroit City FC
Average goals in match 2.472.79 2.47
Both teams scored 47%58% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%52% 53%
Clean sheets 27%26% 40%
Goal before half-time 60%67% 60%
Goal after half-time 87%80% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Pittsburgh Riverhounds 3 - 3 - 0 Detroit City FC. Average goals 1.83, both teams scored in 17% matches.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
0 : 0
Detroit City FC
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
4 : 3
Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC
0 : 0
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
2 : 0
Detroit City FC
Detroit City FC
0 : 0
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
2 : 0
Detroit City FC

FAQ

What was the result of Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Detroit City FC?

The USL Championship match finished Pittsburgh Riverhounds 2:1 Detroit City FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Detroit City FC?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Pittsburgh Riverhounds won 3, Detroit City FC won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 17% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Detroit City FC?

Pittsburgh Riverhounds score 1.27 goals per game on average and Detroit City FC 1.53. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's matches and 53% of Detroit City FC's.

What form are Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Detroit City FC in?

Over the last 5 games Pittsburgh Riverhounds have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Detroit City FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Detroit City FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.