United States - USL ChampionshipHighmark StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Louisville City: match statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Louisville City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pittsburgh Riverhounds play Louisville City in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 18 July 2026 at 18:00. Venue: Highmark Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Louisville City: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.27 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Louisville City scores 1.63 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%, Louisville City 56%. Over 2.5: Pittsburgh Riverhounds 47%, Louisville City 50%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Louisville City has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.24. Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 9.7 shots per match, Louisville City: 16.5.

Match halves

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.87. Louisville City: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: 46-60 (7 goals). Louisville City: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 1-1-3. Average goals 1.80, BTTS 20%.

Match description

Louisville City is clearly in better form: in the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals and average 2.2 points per game (3 wins, 2 draws, 0 losses), while Pittsburgh scored 4 goals in their last 5 and averages 1.4 points (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses). Offensively the visitors have the edge — Louisville averages 1.86 goals on the road versus 1.33 for the home side, and the xG advantage is 1.74 to 1.34; shot volume 14.29 vs 11.33 and shots on target 4.43 vs 3.67 also indicate better chance creation by the visitors. The hosts, however, have a solid home defence, conceding only 1.00 goal per game and keeping 33% clean sheets, versus 1.57 conceded by Louisville away and 29% clean sheets for the visitors. Crucially, Louisville have not had an away game without scoring (0%), whereas Pittsburgh failed to score in 33% of home matches, giving the visitors an efficiency edge. Considering superior chance creation (xG 1.74 vs 1.34), more goals this season (25 vs 16) and a markedly better 2.2 points average over the last 5 matches, I predict a Louisville victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
10Shots11
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
6Shots on target2
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
1.46xG1.43
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
2Corners7
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
55Dangerous attacks81
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
15Fouls9
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
1Cards3
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
1.27Goals scored / match1.63
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
1.2Goals conceded / match1.56
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
49%Average possession53%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
3.47Shots on target / match5
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.67Shots per match16.5
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
3.47Shots on target5
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
13.1%Shot conversion9.8%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
49%Possession53%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
1.24xG for1.95
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
1.29xG against1.18
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

Shooting quality

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: Efficient finishingLouisville City: Attacking
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
Accuracy (shots on target)36%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Louisville City is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.6 pts / match - Louisville City

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
WDLLW
Season result split
47% W13% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-6
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Louisville City
DWDWL
Season result split
44% W19% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-6
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Louisville City is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.63 goals / match - Louisville City

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.2 goals / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.56 goals / match - Louisville City

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scoring profile: strong

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Louisville City keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Louisville City scoring profile: very strong

Louisville City scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

19Goals scored (season)26
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
18Goals conceded (season)25
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
2.47Average goals in match3.19
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal81%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
40%2 goals44%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
20%3 goals25%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
0%4 goals13%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal75%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
40%2 goals56%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
7%3 goals19%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
0%4 goals6%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 15 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time44%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
7%BTTS in both halves25%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
27%Scored in both halves31%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
40%BTTS - last 560%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
13%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 0.88 pts / match - Louisville City

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing
Louisville City - half-time state
6% leading69% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)0.88
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
0.73Average goals (1st half)1.38
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
67%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
67%No goal before half-time56%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per match (2nd half)1.56
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)1
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
1.73Average goals (2nd half)1.81
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
40%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City
40%No goal after half-time31%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLouisville City

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results

40% W27% R33% P
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Louisville City - second-half results

44% W25% R31% P
14
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding733%

Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.21.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Louisville City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Louisville City
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
6
46-60
5
4
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Louisville City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLigaLouisville City
Average goals in match 2.472.79 3.19
Both teams scored 47%58% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%52% 50%
Clean sheets 27%26% 25%
Goal before half-time 60%67% 63%
Goal after half-time 87%80% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1 - 1 - 3 Louisville City. Average goals 1.80, both teams scored in 20% matches.

Louisville City FC
0 : 2
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
0 : 2
Louisville City FC
Louisville City FC
0 : 0
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
0 : 1
Louisville City
Louisville City
3 : 1
Pittsburgh Riverhounds

FAQ

What was the result of Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Louisville City?

The USL Championship match finished Pittsburgh Riverhounds 3:1 Louisville City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Louisville City?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Pittsburgh Riverhounds won 1, Louisville City won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Louisville City?

Pittsburgh Riverhounds score 1.27 goals per game on average and Louisville City 1.63. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's matches and 56% of Louisville City's.

What form are Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Louisville City in?

Over the last 5 games Pittsburgh Riverhounds have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Louisville City 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Louisville City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Louisville City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.