United States - MLSProvidence ParkData current as of September 07, 2026

Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes: match statistics

Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Portland Timbers played against SJ Earthquakes in MLS (United States). The game was played on May 24, 2026. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 1:3.

Recent form

Portland Timbers has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. SJ Earthquakes has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Portland Timbers scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 1.92. SJ Earthquakes scores 2.21 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.28 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of Portland Timbers's games and 57% of SJ Earthquakes's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 57%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

SJ Earthquakes has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.35 per game. Portland Timbers takes 11.9 shots per game, while SJ Earthquakes takes 14.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Portland Timbers leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. SJ Earthquakes leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.29 after halftime.

When the teams score

Portland Timbers's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For SJ Earthquakes, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.28 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I favor Portland (1) primarily due to superior recent metrics over the last five matches: Portland scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches (2.0 per match) with 1.4 points per match, while SJ has only 6 goals (1.2 per match) and 0.4 PPG. At home Portland averages 2.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded per match, whereas SJ away records 2.14 scored and 1.14 conceded, but SJ conceded 10 goals in their last 5 matches (2.0 per match), indicating weakened defensive form. Portland also generates better chances: 4.8 shots on target and 10.6 attempts per home match with a 25% conversion, versus SJ’s 3.43 on target and 9.43 attempts with 23% conversion. Differences in xG are small (Portland xG 1.32 at home vs 1.10 xG for SJ away), but Portland allows higher xG against (1.84 vs 1.66), so I expect an open, high-scoring game (average goals 4.2 for the home side vs 3.29 for the away). Considering 0% FTS for both teams (both regularly score) and the hosts’ better recent form and chance quality, I give them a slight edge and tip a Portland victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS statistics favor the “Yes” outcome: Portland has a seasonal BTTS of 43% and San Jose 71%, with the last 5 matches at 40% and 80% respectively. Both teams regularly score — season goals per match are 2.29 for Portland and 2.14 for San Jose, with xG of 2.11 vs 1.10, while San Jose exhibits higher finishing efficiency (23% vs 12%). Defensively Portland concedes only 0.86 goals seasonally and records 43% clean sheets, but in the last 5 matches they conceded an average of 1.4 goals, whereas San Jose conceded 2.0 goals per match, increasing the likelihood of Goal/Goal. The league overall has a BTTS rate of 61% and an average of 3.26 goals per game, and shooting stats show 19.57 shots and 7.71 on target for Portland vs 9.43 and 3.43 for San Jose — chances will be created. Considering San Jose’s strong pattern (71% season, 80% last 5), the league’s 61% BTTS tendency and both teams’ offensive numbers, I forecast BTTS - Yes at about 65% and No at 35%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The total expected goals are around 2.97 (Portland 1.89 xG, San Jose 1.08 xG), which points to nearly 3 goals in the match. Portland scores on average 2.29 goals at home with 19.57 shots and 7.71 shots on target, while San Jose has 2.14 goals this season with 9.43 shots and 3.43 on target; San Jose’s high finishing rate of 23% versus Portland’s 12% increases the chance of away goals. Season percentages of matches with over 1.5 goals are 86% for Portland and 71% for San Jose, and San Jose has 71% of matches where both teams scored versus 43% for Portland — this further supports a scenario of at least 2 goals. For the 2.5 line both teams are at 57% Over 2.5 seasonally, but the combined xG of 2.97 and Portland’s attack (2.11 xG_for, 19.57 shots) give a moderate edge to Over 2.5 (I estimate ~68%). The strongest, most reliable signal is however Over 1.5, so I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the best line while considering Over 2.5 as a valuable but less certain bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Portland clearly dominates chance creation: xG 2.11 versus 1.10 for San Jose, and on average 19.57 shots and 7.71 SOT compared to 9.43 and 3.43 for the visitors, which favors taking the lead at the break. The home side led at half-time in 4 of 7 home matches (57%) and score on average 1.14 goals before the break versus 0.71 for SJ; additionally all 7 home fixtures featured at least one goal in the first half (100% HT with over 0.5). The visitors have a high away BTTS rate (71%), but have not won in their last 5 matches (0 from 5) and their xG 1.10 indicates a limited number of clear chances. Portland concedes on average only 0.43 goals before the break at home, so given the superiority in shots and xG I expect them to be leading at Half-Time and to maintain that advantage by Full-Time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 3
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

65Possession (%)35
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
15Shots7
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
7Shots on target6
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.86xG1.2
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
4Corners6
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
57Dangerous attacks45
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
10Fouls14
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1Cards4
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.62Goals scored / game2.21
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.92Goals allowed / game1
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
49%Average possession47%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
4.23Shots on target / game5.57
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.92Shots per game14.5
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
4.23Shots on target5.57
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
13.5%Shot conversion15.3%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
49%Possession47%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.35xG for1.6
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
2.1xG against1.36
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers: Efficient finishingSJ Earthquakes: Counter-attacking
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
Accuracy (shots on target)35%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Portland Timbers is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Portland Timbers · 1 pts / game - SJ Earthquakes

Portland Timbers
WLWDL
Season result split
31% W15% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-7
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 2.05BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
SJ Earthquakes
WDDLL
Season result split
64% W14% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-3
2.07 pts / game · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJ Earthquakes is 36% better for: goals scored per game.

1.62 goals / game - Portland Timbers · 2.21 goals / game - SJ Earthquakes

SJ Earthquakes is 92% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.92 goals / game - Portland Timbers · 1 goals / game - SJ Earthquakes

Portland Timbers scoring profile: strong

Portland Timbers scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 meczów).

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: very strong

SJ Earthquakes scores in 93% of games (13 of 14 meczów), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)31
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
25Goals conceded (season)14
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
3.54Average goals per game3.21
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
10Goals scored (last 5)9
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal93%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
54%2 goals64%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
15%3 goals43%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
8%4 goals14%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal64%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
69%2 goals21%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
23%3 goals14%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
8%4 goals0%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time29%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
0%BTTS in both halves14%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
46%Scored in both halves43%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
40%BTTS - last 5100%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
62%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJ Earthquakes is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / game - Portland Timbers · 1.71 pts / game - SJ Earthquakes

Portland Timbers - half-time state
31% leading23% draw46% trailing
SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per game (1st half)1.71
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1Goals scored (1st half)0.93
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.08Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
2.08Average goals (1st half)1.36
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
23%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
38%No goal before half-time29%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per game (2nd half)1.64
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)1.29
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.86
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
54%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes
46%No goal after half-time36%
Portland TimbersSJ Earthquakes

Portland Timbers - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
15
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

43% W36% R21% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Portland Timbers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.20
Goals scored / game1.20.8
Goals allowed / game1.40.0
Average goals per game2.60.8
1 goal100%60%
2 goals100%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
SJ Earthquakes - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.40
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.61.4
Average goals per game1.62.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
5
4
16-30
4
5
31-45
0
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.38
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-1.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Portland TimbersLigaSJ Earthquakes
Average goals per game 3.543.28 3.21
Both teams scored 62%61% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 62%63% 57%
Clean sheets 8%22% 36%
Goal before half-time 100%77% 86%
Goal after half-time 77%81% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.28
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.93
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJ EarthquakesGoalPreston JuddAssist: Jack Skahan
  2. SJ EarthquakesGoalPreston JuddAssist: Nick Fernandez
  3. Portland TimbersGoalAntony Alves SantosAssist: David Pereira da Costa
  4. SJ EarthquakesGoalDaniel MunieAssist: Jack Skahan
  5. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardReid Roberts
  6. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardBenjamin Kikanovic
  7. Portland TimbersYellow cardKamal Anthony Miller
  8. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Ian SmithOff: Kamal Anthony Miller
  9. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Darius JohnsonOff: Preston Judd
  10. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Juan David Mosquera LópezOff: Brandon Bye
  11. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardRonaldo Augusto Vieira Nan
  12. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: David RomneyOff: Jamar Ricketts
  13. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardDaniel De Sousa Brito

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Timothy FordMatches officiated: 8
4.38Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins13%Draws38%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes?

The MLS match finished Portland Timbers 1:3 SJ Earthquakes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes?

Portland Timbers score 1.62 goals per game on average and SJ Earthquakes 2.21. The MLS average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Portland Timbers's matches and 57% of SJ Earthquakes's.

What form are Portland Timbers and SJ Earthquakes in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and SJ Earthquakes 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes?

The statistical background for Portland Timbers vs SJ Earthquakes — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.