PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta presents significantly better form and statistics compared to the hosts. PSBS Biak Numfor occupies 16th place in the table with only 27% wins at home and a negative goal difference (-4) at their own stadium. The guests, from the 8th position, have 36% wins on the road and a positive goal difference (+1), as well as a higher average possession (56% vs 50%) and a better shot conversion rate (11% vs 9%). PSBS has not won any of their last 5 home matches, while PSIM has shown solid form in their last 5 away matches with three victories. The hosts' weak form in the last five meetings (only 1 point per match) and low offensive efficiency (45% of matches without scoring a goal at home) further argue for a favorable result for the guests.
PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
PSBS Biak Numfor played against PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on February 27, 2026. Final score: 2:4.
Recent form
PSBS Biak Numfor has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. PSIM Yogyakarta has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
PSBS Biak Numfor scores 1.09 goals per game and allows 2.05. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.32 and allows 1.27. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of PSBS Biak Numfor's games and 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 50%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.30 per game. PSBS Biak Numfor takes 11.3 shots per game, while PSIM Yogyakarta takes 13.1.
First-half and second-half trends
PSBS Biak Numfor leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.95 after halftime.
When the teams score
PSBS Biak Numfor's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For PSIM Yogyakarta, it is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PSIM Yogyakarta presents significantly better form and statistics compared to the hosts. PSBS Biak Numfor occupies 16th place in the table with only 27% wins at home and a negative goal difference (-4) at their own stadium. The guests, from the 8th position, have 36% wins on the road and a positive goal difference (+1), as well as a higher average possession (56% vs 50%) and a better shot conversion rate (11% vs 9%). PSBS has not won any of their last 5 home matches, while PSIM has shown solid form in their last 5 away matches with three victories. The hosts' weak form in the last five meetings (only 1 point per match) and low offensive efficiency (45% of matches without scoring a goal at home) further argue for a favorable result for the guests.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| PSBS Biak Numfor | PSIM Yogyakarta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - PSBS Biak Numfor · 0.6 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 21% better for: goals scored per game.
1.09 goals / game - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.32 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
PSIM Yogyakarta is 61% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.05 goals / game - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.27 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
PSBS Biak Numfor scores in 64% of games (14 of 22 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 meczów).
PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 77% of games (17 of 22 meczów), while PSBS Biak Numfor keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSBS Biak Numfor
Over / Under - PSIM Yogyakarta
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / game - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.05 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSBS Biak Numfor - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
PSBS Biak Numfor
PSIM Yogyakarta
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| PSBS Biak Numfor | Liga | PSIM Yogyakarta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.14 | 2.64 | • 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 51% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 26% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 70% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | • 82% | 82% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from PSBS Biak Numfor's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against PSIM Yogyakarta. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta?
The Liga 1 match finished PSBS Biak Numfor 2:4 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta?
PSBS Biak Numfor score 1.09 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.32. The Liga 1 average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 64% of PSBS Biak Numfor's matches and 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.
What form are PSBS Biak Numfor and PSIM Yogyakarta in?
Over the last 5 games PSBS Biak Numfor have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSBS Biak Numfor vs PSIM Yogyakarta?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.