PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor: match statistics
PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
PSIM Yogyakarta played against PSBS Biak Numfor in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on December 29, 2025. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
PSIM Yogyakarta has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. PSBS Biak Numfor has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.21 goals per game and allows 1.14. PSBS Biak Numfor scores 0.93 and allows 2.14. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's games and 57% of PSBS Biak Numfor's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 79%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.27 per game. PSIM Yogyakarta takes 11.8 shots per game, while PSBS Biak Numfor takes 10.6.
First-half and second-half trends
PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. PSBS Biak Numfor leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
PSIM Yogyakarta's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For PSBS Biak Numfor, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| PSIM Yogyakarta | PSBS Biak Numfor | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.2 pts / game - PSBS Biak Numfor
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 30% better for: goals scored per game.
1.21 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.93 goals / game - PSBS Biak Numfor
PSIM Yogyakarta is 88% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.14 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 2.14 goals / game - PSBS Biak Numfor
PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 meczów), while PSBS Biak Numfor keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).
PSBS Biak Numfor scores in 57% of games (8 of 14 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSIM Yogyakarta
Over / Under - PSBS Biak Numfor
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 139% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.57 pts / game - PSBS Biak Numfor
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
PSBS Biak Numfor - second-half results
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
PSIM Yogyakarta
PSBS Biak Numfor
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| PSIM Yogyakarta | Liga | PSBS Biak Numfor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.36 | 2.60 | ▲ 3.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 57% | • 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 50% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 24% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 84% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor?
The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 2:2 PSBS Biak Numfor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor?
PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.21 goals per game on average and PSBS Biak Numfor 0.93. The Liga 1 average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 57% of PSBS Biak Numfor's.
What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and PSBS Biak Numfor in?
Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and PSBS Biak Numfor 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSIM Yogyakarta vs PSBS Biak Numfor: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.