Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Madura United: match statistics

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Madura United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSIM Yogyakarta play Madura United in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

PSIM Yogyakarta: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Madura United: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.26 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Madura United scores 1.09 and concedes 1.59. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSIM Yogyakarta 53%, Madura United 56%. Over 2.5: PSIM Yogyakarta 50%, Madura United 56%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

PSIM Yogyakarta has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.28. PSIM Yogyakarta: 13.2 shots per match, Madura United: 10.6.

Match halves

PSIM Yogyakarta: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.79. Madura United: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

PSIM Yogyakarta: 61-75 (11 goals). Madura United: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back a PSIM Yogyakarta win (1) based on superior season metrics: PSIM have 40 goals for and 40 against vs Madura United’s 34 for and 52 against, a goal difference of 0 vs -18. At home PSIM control the game — 61% possession, 13.31 shots and 4.06 shots on target per match and xG 1.59, while Madura away average 42% possession, 9.31 shots, 3.19 on target and xG 1.09, so the hosts create more and higher-quality chances. Although Madura have the better recent form (7 goals and 3 wins in their last 5, 1.8 points per game), PSIM have scored only 4 goals and won once in their last 5 (0.8 ppg). Defensively the hosts hold an edge — PSIM concede 1.25 goals at home with average xG against 1.29, whereas Madura concede 1.75 on the road with xG against 1.93; additionally guests fail to score in 38% of away matches versus 19% of home matches where hosts are goalless. Considering possession control, higher xG (1.59 vs 1.09) and superior season balance, I assess probabilities as 60% for the home win, 25% for a draw and 15% for Madura.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
17Shots7
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
10Shots on target2
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
2.29xG0.92
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
9Corners1
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
71Dangerous attacks45
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
15Fouls8
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
5Cards0
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
1.26Goals scored / match1.09
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
1.29Goals conceded / match1.59
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
59%Average possession46%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
4.41Shots on target / match3.59
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.18Shots per match10.62
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
4.41Shots on target3.59
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
9.6%Shot conversion10.2%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
59%Possession46%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
1.57xG for1.28
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
1.42xG against1.69
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

Shooting quality

PSIM Yogyakarta: BalancedMadura United: Balanced
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Madura United is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.8 pts / match - Madura United

PSIM Yogyakarta
LLWWL
Season result split
32% W35% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-11
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Madura United
WWLLW
Season result split
26% W24% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-17
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-9
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.09 goals / match - Madura United

PSIM Yogyakarta is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.59 goals / match - Madura United

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Madura United keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).

Madura United scoring profile: strong

Madura United scores in 68% of matches (23 of 34 matches), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

43Goals scored (season)37
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
44Goals conceded (season)54
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
2.56Average goals in match2.68
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
5Goals scored (last 5)7
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal68%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
38%2 goals32%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
12%3 goals3%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
3%4 goals3%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal79%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
41%2 goals44%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
15%3 goals21%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
3%4 goals12%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time15%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
6%BTTS in both halves6%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
18%Scored in both halves29%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
40%BTTS - last 540%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Madura United is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.47 pts / match - Madura United

PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing
Madura United - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.47
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.53
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
0.97Average goals (1st half)1.12
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
56%Clean sheet before half-time62%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
65%No goal before half-time50%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)0.97
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)1
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.56
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
47%Clean sheet after half-time32%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United
44%No goal after half-time53%
PSIM YogyakartaMadura United

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

35% W32% R32% P
40
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Madura United - second-half results

21% W35% R44% P
50
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Madura United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.402.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
6
8
46-60
11
6
61-75
10
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Madura United
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
1
3
16-30
9
11
31-45
4
12
46-60
8
11
61-75
7
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.62
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Madura United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSIM YogyakartaLigaMadura United
Average goals in match 2.562.80 2.68
Both teams scored 53%52% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%54% 56%
Clean sheets 29%27% 21%
Goal before half-time 62%72% 74%
Goal after half-time 79%81% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: PSIM Yogyakarta 1 - 0 - 0 Madura United. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Madura United?

The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 2:1 Madura United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Madura United?

PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.26 goals per game on average and Madura United 1.09. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 56% of Madura United's.

What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Madura United in?

Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Madura United 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Madura United?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Madura United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.