Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of September 06, 2026

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap: match statistics

PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta
2 : 2half-time 2:1
Persijap crest
Persijap
165%(1.77)
X25%(3.40)
210%(3.80)

PSIM Yogyakarta presents a significantly better home form with a 36% win rate and only 18% defeats at their own stadium, while Persijap in away matches wins only 9% of their games and loses a staggering 73%. The hosts remain undefeated in their last five matches with four draws and one victory, which proves their defensive solidity. A key factor is the advantage in Expected Goals - PSIM averages 1.7 xG in home matches against 1.3 xGA, whereas Persijap averages only 0.64 goals scored away against 2.09 goals conceded. The difference in goal difference is clear: the hosts have a zero balance in home matches, and the visitors a dramatic -16 on the road. Additionally, Persijap fails to score in 55% of away matches, which, combined with PSIM's solid defense (36% clean sheets), gives the hosts a clear advantage to secure a victory.

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSIM Yogyakarta played against Persijap in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on March 11, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

PSIM Yogyakarta has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Persijap has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.25. Persijap scores 0.83 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's games and 50% of Persijap's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 54%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.42 per game. PSIM Yogyakarta takes 13.4 shots per game, while Persijap takes 11.6.

First-half and second-half trends

PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Persijap leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.58 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSIM Yogyakarta's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). For Persijap, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PSIM Yogyakarta presents a significantly better home form with a 36% win rate and only 18% defeats at their own stadium, while Persijap in away matches wins only 9% of their games and loses a staggering 73%. The hosts remain undefeated in their last five matches with four draws and one victory, which proves their defensive solidity. A key factor is the advantage in Expected Goals - PSIM averages 1.7 xG in home matches against 1.3 xGA, whereas Persijap averages only 0.64 goals scored away against 2.09 goals conceded. The difference in goal difference is clear: the hosts have a zero balance in home matches, and the visitors a dramatic -16 on the road. Additionally, Persijap fails to score in 55% of away matches, which, combined with PSIM's solid defense (36% clean sheets), gives the hosts a clear advantage to secure a victory.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
9Shots10
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
3Shots on target3
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
1.17xG1.3
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
3Corners3
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
53Dangerous attacks63
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
13Fouls14
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
1Cards1
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
1.38Goals scored / game0.83
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
1.25Goals allowed / game1.63
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
58%Average possession47%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
4.5Shots on target / game4.17
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.42Shots per game11.58
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
4.5Shots on target4.17
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
10.2%Shot conversion7.2%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
58%Possession47%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
1.6xG for1.42
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
1.46xG against1.45
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

Shooting quality

PSIM Yogyakarta: BalancedPersijap: Balanced
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Persijap is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.6 pts / game - Persijap

PSIM Yogyakarta
DDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
38% W42% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-5
1.54 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Persijap
WLWDD
Season result split
21% W21% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-14
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-8
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 66% better for: goals scored per game.

1.38 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.83 goals / game - Persijap

PSIM Yogyakarta is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.25 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.63 goals / game - Persijap

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 meczów), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 meczów).

Persijap scoring profile: mixed

Persijap scores in 58% of games (14 of 24 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 38% (9 of 24 meczów).

33Goals scored (season)20
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
30Goals conceded (season)39
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
2.63Average goals per game2.46
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
9Goals scored (last 5)4
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal58%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
42%2 goals21%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
17%3 goals4%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
4%4 goals0%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal79%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
42%2 goals54%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
17%3 goals21%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
4%4 goals8%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time13%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
8%BTTS in both halves4%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
21%Scored in both halves13%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
60%BTTS - last 520%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

54%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.04 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.83 pts / game - Persijap

PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
17% leading54% draw29% trailing
Persijap - half-time state
13% leading46% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.04Points per game (1st half)0.83
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.25
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
0.88Average goals (1st half)0.96
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
58%Clean sheet before half-time46%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
71%No goal before half-time75%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per game (2nd half)1.08
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.92
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.5
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
50%Clean sheet after half-time29%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap
33%No goal after half-time54%
PSIM YogyakartaPersijap

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

46% W33% R21% P
25
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding224%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Persijap - second-half results

25% W33% R42% P
20
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding162%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.80
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Persijap - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
6
7
31-45
4
5
46-60
11
3
61-75
9
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Persijap
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
0
5
16-30
3
7
31-45
2
5
46-60
6
3
61-75
6
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Persijap

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.77
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSIM YogyakartaLigaPersijap
Average goals per game 2.632.71 2.46
Both teams scored 50%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 54%
Clean sheets 38%26% 21%
Goal before half-time 54%70% 67%
Goal after half-time 83%82% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / game
1.18
Away goals / game
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSIM YogyakartaGoalNolberto Ezequiel VidalAssist: Riyatno Abiyoso
  2. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Rio HardiawanOff: Raka Cahyana Rizky
  3. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardJosé Pedro Magalhães Valente
  4. PersijapYellow cardBorja Herrera González
  5. PersijapSubstitutionOn: Sudi AbdallahOff: Iker Guarrotxena Vallejo
  6. PersijapSubstitutionOn: Firman RamadhanOff: Lucas Morelatto da Cruz
  7. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Andi IrfanOff: Riyatno Abiyoso

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Nendi RohaendiiMatches officiated: 14
5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 243%Home wins28%Draws28%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from PSIM Yogyakarta's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Persijap. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap?

The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 2:2 Persijap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap?

PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.38 goals per game on average and Persijap 0.83. The Liga 1 average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 50% of Persijap's.

What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Persijap in?

Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Persijap 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persijap: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.