Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of September 07, 2026

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Semen Padang: match statistics

PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Semen Padang crest
Semen Padang
165%(1.61)
X22%(3.60)
213%(4.75)

PSIM Yogyakarta displays significantly better home form with a 43% win rate and only 14% losses at their own stadium, while Semen Padang suffers from catastrophic away results with an 86% loss rate and zero draws. The hosts hold a positive home goal difference (+2) and superior xG stats (1.51 for vs 1.31 against), indicating a qualitative advantage. Semen Padang has failed to keep a single clean sheet on the road and hasn't earned a point in 57% of matches, confirming massive offensive struggles away from home. The difference in possession (58% vs 45%) and shot efficiency (11% vs 6%) further favors the hosts. Considering all statistical data, PSIM Yogyakarta holds a clear edge and should secure the victory in this encounter.

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Semen Padang: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSIM Yogyakarta played against Semen Padang in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on January 4, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

PSIM Yogyakarta has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Semen Padang has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.20. Semen Padang scores 0.73 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.61 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 53% of PSIM Yogyakarta's games and 47% of Semen Padang's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 40%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.34 per game. PSIM Yogyakarta takes 12.0 shots per game, while Semen Padang takes 10.5.

First-half and second-half trends

PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Semen Padang leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.60 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSIM Yogyakarta's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Semen Padang, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.61 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PSIM Yogyakarta displays significantly better home form with a 43% win rate and only 14% losses at their own stadium, while Semen Padang suffers from catastrophic away results with an 86% loss rate and zero draws. The hosts hold a positive home goal difference (+2) and superior xG stats (1.51 for vs 1.31 against), indicating a qualitative advantage. Semen Padang has failed to keep a single clean sheet on the road and hasn't earned a point in 57% of matches, confirming massive offensive struggles away from home. The difference in possession (58% vs 45%) and shot efficiency (11% vs 6%) further favors the hosts. Considering all statistical data, PSIM Yogyakarta holds a clear edge and should secure the victory in this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
15Shots9
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
5Shots on target3
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
1.99xG1.12
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
4Corners3
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
94Dangerous attacks47
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
7Fouls7
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
1Cards2
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
1.27Goals scored / game0.73
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
1.2Goals allowed / game1.67
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
58%Average possession48%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
4.27Shots on target / game3.53
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12Shots per game10.53
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
4.27Shots on target3.53
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
10.6%Shot conversion7%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
58%Possession48%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
1.49xG for1.34
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
1.42xG against1.44
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

Shooting quality

PSIM Yogyakarta: BalancedSemen Padang: Balanced
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

PSIM Yogyakarta
DWLDD
Season result split
40% W40% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-3
1.60 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Semen Padang
LWLWL
Season result split
20% W7% R73% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-11
0.67 pts / game · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-6
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 74% better for: goals scored per game.

1.27 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.73 goals / game - Semen Padang

PSIM Yogyakarta is 39% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.2 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.67 goals / game - Semen Padang

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 meczów), while Semen Padang keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 meczów).

Semen Padang scoring profile: strong

Semen Padang scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).

19Goals scored (season)11
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
18Goals conceded (season)25
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
2.47Average goals per game2.4
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
6Goals scored (last 5)5
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal60%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
40%2 goals13%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
7%3 goals0%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
0%4 goals0%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal87%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
33%2 goals53%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
13%3 goals13%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
7%4 goals7%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time7%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
20%Scored in both halves7%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
60%BTTS - last 560%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 112% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.6 pts / game - Semen Padang

PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing
Semen Padang - half-time state
7% leading40% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per game (1st half)0.6
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.13
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
0.87Average goals (1st half)0.93
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
67%Clean sheet before half-time40%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
67%No goal before half-time87%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per game (2nd half)1.07
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.47
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
53%Clean sheet after half-time40%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang
33%No goal after half-time47%
PSIM YogyakartaSemen Padang

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

47% W27% R27% P
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Semen Padang - second-half results

33% W7% R60% P
9
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding286%

Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Semen Padang - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.80
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game1.20.8
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-50
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
2
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Semen Padang
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
0
6
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
6
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Semen Padang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.84
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
55% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
55%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSIM YogyakartaLigaSemen Padang
Average goals per game 2.472.61 2.40
Both teams scored 53%56% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%50% 40%
Clean sheets 33%25% 13%
Goal before half-time 53%66% 67%
Goal after half-time 87%84% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.61
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.50
Home goals / game
1.12
Away goals / game
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardReva Adi Utama
  2. Semen PadangYellow cardHerwin Tri Saputra
  3. Semen PadangSubstitutionOn: Samuel Christianson SimanjuntakOff: Firman Juliansyah
  4. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Dede SafariOff: Reva Adi Utama
  5. Semen PadangYellow cardRipal Wahyudi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Semen Padang?

The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 1:0 Semen Padang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Semen Padang?

PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.27 goals per game on average and Semen Padang 0.73. The Liga 1 average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 53% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 47% of Semen Padang's.

What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Semen Padang in?

Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Semen Padang 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Semen Padang?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.