Qingdao Jonoon vs Beijing Guoan: match statistics
Qingdao Jonoon vs Beijing Guoan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Qingdao Jonoon played against Beijing Guoan in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on October 9, 2026. Venue: Qingdao Tiantai Stadium. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
Qingdao Jonoon has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Beijing Guoan has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 2.04. Beijing Guoan scores 1.88 and allows 1.27. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 69% of Qingdao Jonoon's games and 65% of Beijing Guoan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 62%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Beijing Guoan has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.38 per game. Qingdao Jonoon takes 12.9 shots per game, while Beijing Guoan takes 15.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Qingdao Jonoon leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. Beijing Guoan leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.23 after halftime.
When the teams score
Qingdao Jonoon's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Beijing Guoan, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Chinese Super League games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beijing Guoan sit 3rd, while Qingdao Jonoon are 16th, a gap reflected in their recent form: the visitors are unbeaten in 5 matches, whereas the hosts have lost all 5. Over this period, Qingdao have scored 4 goals and conceded 13, while Beijing have netted 10 and conceded 6. Away from home, the visitors average 1.69 goals scored and 1.15 conceded, while Qingdao average 1.50 scored and 1.58 conceded at home. However, the quality of chances created is similar: Qingdao’s home xG stands at 1.45, compared with Beijing’s away xG of 1.44, so the hosts should not be written off. The visitors’ edge in shot conversion, 14% versus 11%, and a loss rate of just 15% away from home point to an away win, although their 46% away draw rate makes a share of the points a realistic scenario.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have recorded a high rate of matches with goals at both ends this season: 69% for Qingdao Jonoon and 62% for Beijing Guoan, rising to 80% for each side across their last 5 matches. The hosts average 2.08 goals per game and have scored in every match so far, although their average has fallen to 0.8 goals over their last 5 outings. The visitors’ chances of scoring are bolstered by their average of 2.0 goals across their last 5 matches, while Qingdao have conceded 2.6 goals per game over that span. Meanwhile, the hosts’ average xG is 1.95, and Beijing allow opponents chances worth 1.54 xG, which supports the case for a Qingdao goal despite their recent dip in finishing. Therefore, BTTS - Yes is more likely, although the hosts’ reduced scoring output makes this pick less certain.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 92% of Qingdao’s home matches and 77% of Beijing’s away matches. The hosts average 2.08 goals scored at home, while the visitors score 1.69 on the road, supporting a forecast of 3.40 goals in total. Qingdao’s recent form does, however, temper expectations of its attack: across five matches, it has averaged just 0.8 goals scored while conceding 2.6. Beijing averaged 2.0 goals over the same period, so the hosts’ weaker defense keeps the prospect of at least two goals in the match alive. Over 2.5 also has a solid case, but its historical hit rates are 69% for Qingdao and 54% for Beijing, making the safer Over 1.5 line the clearer signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Beijing Guoan led at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches, while Qingdao Jonoon went into half-time trailing 3 times over the same period. In those matches, the home side conceded an average of 1.4 goals before the break, while the visitors scored 1.0 and conceded just 0.2, pointing to Beijing leading at half-time. After the break, Qingdao have recently averaged just 0.2 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, so a turnaround may prove difficult. The visitors have not lost any of their last 5 matches, while the hosts have lost all 5, making Beijing the most likely side to hold on to their lead. However, Qingdao's season average of 2.08 goals compared with Beijing's 1.69 serves as a reminder of the home side's attacking potential and justifies leaving a significant chance for draw outcomes in the HT/FT market.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Qingdao Jonoon | Beijing Guoan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beijing Guoan is 44% better for: goals scored per game.
1.31 goals / game - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.88 goals / game - Beijing Guoan
Beijing Guoan is 61% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.04 goals / game - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.27 goals / game - Beijing Guoan
Qingdao Jonoon scores in 73% of games (19 of 26 games), while Beijing Guoan keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 games).
Beijing Guoan scores in 92% of games (24 of 26 games), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 26 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qingdao Jonoon
Over / Under - Beijing Guoan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beijing Guoan is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / game - Qingdao Jonoon · 1.73 pts / game - Beijing Guoan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Beijing Guoan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Qingdao Jonoon
Beijing Guoan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qingdao Jonoon | Liga | Beijing Guoan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.35 | 3.09 | • 3.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 64% | • 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 58% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 20% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 71% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | • 88% | 87% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Qingdao Jonoon's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Beijing Guoan. Games average 4.67 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Qingdao Jonoon vs Beijing Guoan?
The Chinese Super League match finished Qingdao Jonoon 0:3 Beijing Guoan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Qingdao Jonoon and Beijing Guoan?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Qingdao Jonoon won 1, Beijing Guoan won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Qingdao Jonoon vs Beijing Guoan?
Qingdao Jonoon score 1.31 goals per game on average and Beijing Guoan 1.88. The Chinese Super League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Qingdao Jonoon's matches and 65% of Beijing Guoan's.
What form are Qingdao Jonoon and Beijing Guoan in?
Over the last 5 games Qingdao Jonoon have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Beijing Guoan 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qingdao Jonoon vs Beijing Guoan?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.