Qizilqum vs Buxoro: match statistics
Qizilqum vs Buxoro: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Qizilqum played against Buxoro in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Yoshlar Sport Majmuasi. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Qizilqum has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Buxoro has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Qizilqum scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 1.37. Buxoro scores 1.47 and allows 1.05. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 32% of Qizilqum's games and 58% of Buxoro's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 42%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Buxoro has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.16 per game. Qizilqum takes 9.2 shots per game, while Buxoro takes 10.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Qizilqum leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.32 goals per game after halftime. Buxoro leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.79 after halftime.
When the teams score
Qizilqum's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Buxoro, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Qizilqum have a clearly better home record: they win 50% of their home matches, while Buxoro win only 22% of their away games and lose 44%. The hosts concede an average of 1.20 goals at home, with an xG against of 1.30, while Buxoro allow opponents an xG of 1.60 away from home and keep a clean sheet in just 22% of matches. The visitors’ attack has been effective recently, scoring 11 goals in five matches and remaining unbeaten throughout that run, but their away average of 1.11 goals is lower than Qizilqum’s 1.20 goals at home. Qizilqum have also won 3 of their last 5 matches, while home advantage and Buxoro’s weaker away defense slightly favor the hosts. A draw remains a realistic outcome, as Buxoro draw 33% of their away matches and both teams have similar attacking xG averages: 1.19 for the hosts versus 1.22 for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is moderately positive, as both teams scored in 67% of Buxoro’s matches this season and in as many as 80% of their last 5 games. The visitors are currently clinical, averaging 2.2 goals across their five most recent appearances, while Qizilqum conceded 1.4 goals per match during this period. The hosts should respond offensively: at home, they average 1.8 goals, register 5.1 shots on target per match, and failed to score in only 10% of their games. The risk to the pick is Qizilqum’s very solid defensive record this season: at home, they allow opponents just 0.6 goals and keep a clean sheet in 40% of matches, while their BTTS rate across the last 5 games is only 20%. Nevertheless, Buxoro’s xG of 1.22 for the season and 1.36 over their last five matches indicates that the visitors have genuine arguments for breaking through the hosts’ defense.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Qizilqum score an average of 1.8 goals at home, while Buxoro concede 1.56 away from home, giving the hosts a clear prospect of finding the net. At the same time, Qizilqum allow opponents to score just 0.6 goals per match, while Buxoro average 1.11 goals away from home, so a high-scoring contribution from the visitors is not the most likely scenario. Across the season, matches with Under 3.5 goals accounted for 80% of Qizilqum’s games and 67% of Buxoro’s, while the 3.5-goal line was exceeded in just 20% and 33% of matches, respectively. The teams’ last five matches were more often open, with 60% producing Over 2.5 goals, but the projected total of 2.40 goals still clearly supports the Under 3.5 goals option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Qizilqum have a clear advantage over the course of the season: they win 80% of their matches, score an average of 1.8 goals at home and concede just 0.6, while Buxoro lose 44% of their games and concede an average of 1.56 goals. The strongest signal concerns the first half, as the hosts held a lead at the break in 7 of 10 matches, compared with just 1 of 9 for the visitors, with Qizilqum averaging 0.90 goals and Buxoro 0.44 goals before half-time. The hosts kept a clean sheet after the break in 80% of their matches, increasing the likelihood of maintaining a favourable result once they take the lead. However, Buxoro’s strong recent form must also be considered: they are unbeaten in their last five matches and have scored an average of 1.4 goals after half-time, which is why draw-at-half-time variants account for a significant share of the probability. Nevertheless, the combination of seasonal quality, home advantage and Qizilqum’s superiority in the opening 45 minutes most strongly points to a scenario in which the hosts lead at the break and go on to win the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Qizilqum | Buxoro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Buxoro is 22% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Qizilqum · 2.2 pts / game - Buxoro
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Buxoro is 65% better for: goals scored per game.
0.89 goals / game - Qizilqum · 1.47 goals / game - Buxoro
Buxoro is 30% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.37 goals / game - Qizilqum · 1.05 goals / game - Buxoro
Qizilqum scores in 58% of games (11 of 19 games), while Buxoro keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 games).
Buxoro scores in 89% of games (17 of 19 games), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Qizilqum
Over / Under - Buxoro
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Buxoro is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / game - Qizilqum · 1.63 pts / game - Buxoro
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Qizilqum - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Buxoro - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Qizilqum
Buxoro
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Qizilqum | Liga | Buxoro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.26 | 2.63 | ▼ 2.53 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 53% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 51% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 27% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 68% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 76% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Qizilqum's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Buxoro. Games average 1.67 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Qizilqum vs Buxoro?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Qizilqum 3:2 Buxoro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Qizilqum and Buxoro?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Qizilqum won 1, Buxoro won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Qizilqum vs Buxoro?
Qizilqum score 0.89 goals per game on average and Buxoro 1.47. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Qizilqum's matches and 58% of Buxoro's.
What form are Qizilqum and Buxoro in?
Over the last 5 games Qizilqum have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Buxoro 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Qizilqum vs Buxoro?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


