Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton: match statistics
Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Queen's Park played against Greenock Morton in Championship (Scotland). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Ochilview Park. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Queen's Park has 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.25 points per game. Greenock Morton has 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.25 points per game.
Scoring records
Queen's Park scores 0.25 goals per game and allows 1.50. Greenock Morton scores 0.50 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 1.71 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of Queen's Park's games and 50% of Greenock Morton's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 25%, compared with league averages of 33% for BTTS and 14% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Greenock Morton has the higher season xG average, 0.79 to 0.60 per game. Queen's Park takes 3.3 shots per game, while Greenock Morton takes 5.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Queen's Park leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Greenock Morton leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Queen's Park's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). For Greenock Morton, it is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Championship games average 1.71 goals. Both teams score in 33% of games, and 14% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Both teams have started the season without a win: Queen's Park have a record of 0 wins, 1 draw and 3 defeats, while Greenock Morton have an identical record. The hosts have lost both of their matches at home so far, conceding an average of 2.0 goals, while Morton have also failed to win away and score just 0.5 goals per match on the road. Queen's Park's attacking potential looks slightly stronger, as their average home xG stands at 1.05 compared with Morton's 0.96 away from home, while their chance-conversion rate is 20% versus 7% for the visitors. At the same time, neither side has kept a clean sheet yet, and both have failed to score in 50% of their home or away matches, respectively, pointing to a cautious and evenly matched contest. A draw is the most likely outcome, although home advantage gives Queen's Park a slightly greater chance of ending their winless run.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No scenario is more strongly supported by the very weak attacking output: both Queen's Park and Greenock Morton score just 0.5 goals per match on average. In their last five games, the hosts have averaged 0.8 goals, while the visitors have managed only 0.4, with BTTS at 40% for each team. The quality of chances created is also limited, particularly for Queen's Park, who have recorded 0.61 xG this season, while Morton post 0.96 xG and average just 2.5 shots on target. Both teams concede 1.5 goals per match on average and have failed to keep a clean sheet, which creates a chance of a single goal but does not eliminate the risk that one side will fail to score. A low-scoring league, where both teams score, is not an additional argument for BTTS either, as the percentage of such matches is only 35%, with an average of 1.75 goals.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to limited attacking potential: Queen's Park average 0.5 goals, while Greenock Morton also average 0.5 goals per game. The hosts create just 0.61 xG and record an average of 1 shot on target, whereas the visitors produce 0.96 xG and 2.5 shots on target, supporting a scenario of around 2 goals rather than an open end-to-end game. Over 2.5 goals landed in 40% of Queen's Park's last five matches and in just 20% of Morton's, while both teams conceded 7 goals. Additionally, neither side has recorded a match with at least 4 goals in the current competition, and the league average stands at only 1.75 goals. The strongest option is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the data leave a clear margin even in the event of defensive errors from both sides.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Queen's Park win, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with 2 of 5 for Greenock Morton. The first halves should be cautious: Queen's Park averaged 0.4 goals in them, while Morton failed to score in the first half of each of their last five matches. After the break, however, the hosts have the advantage of better current full-match form: they have scored 0.8 goals per game and won 20% of their last five matches, whereas the visitors are averaging just 0.4 goals and have recorded 0% wins. Morton were trailing at half-time in 60% of their last five matches, and their first-half goal difference stands at minus 3, increasing the likelihood that an even start will give way to a home advantage. Both teams have conceded relatively heavily after the break, averaging 1.0 and 0.8 goals conceded respectively over their last five appearances, so a half-time draw does not necessarily have to hold until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Queen's Park | Greenock Morton | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Greenock Morton is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
0.25 goals / game - Queen's Park · 0.5 goals / game - Greenock Morton
Queen's Park scores in 25% of games (1 of 4 games), while Greenock Morton keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
Greenock Morton scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 games), while Queen's Park keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Queen's Park
Over / Under - Greenock Morton
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Queen's Park is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.75 pts / game - Queen's Park · 0.5 pts / game - Greenock Morton
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Queen's Park - second-half results
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Greenock Morton - second-half results
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.75 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 0.3 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 25% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 25% |
| No goal | 100% | 75% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 25% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Queen's Park
Greenock Morton
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).
Teams vs league
| Queen's Park | Liga | Greenock Morton | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.75 | 1.71 | ▲ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 33% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 25% | 14% | ▲ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 40% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 25% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 62% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Queen's Park's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss against Greenock Morton. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton?
The Championship match finished Queen's Park 2:1 Greenock Morton. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Queen's Park and Greenock Morton?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Queen's Park won 1, Greenock Morton won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton?
Queen's Park score 0.25 goals per game on average and Greenock Morton 0.50. The Championship average is 1.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 14% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Queen's Park's matches and 50% of Greenock Morton's.
What form are Queen's Park and Greenock Morton in?
Over the last 5 games Queen's Park have a 0-1-3 record (0.25 points per game) and Greenock Morton 0-1-3 (0.25 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Queen's Park vs Greenock Morton: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


