Argentina - Primera DivisiónData current as of 23 July 2026

Racing Club vs River Plate: match statistics

Racing Club crest
Racing Club
0 : 2half-time 0:1
River Plate crest
River Plate

Racing Club vs River Plate: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Racing Club play River Plate in Primera División (Argentina). The match date is 13 April 2026 at 01:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Racing Club: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. River Plate: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Racing Club scores 1.06 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. River Plate scores 1.45 and concedes 0.85. League average: 2.08 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Racing Club 50%, River Plate 35%. Over 2.5: Racing Club 39%, River Plate 35%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

River Plate has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.37. Racing Club: 11.9 shots per match, River Plate: 16.8.

Match halves

Racing Club: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.56. River Plate: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.95.

Goals by minute

Racing Club: 76-90+ (8 goals). River Plate: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Racing at home generates the most chances — on average 17.5 shots with 4.25 on target per match, xG 1.86 and 1.5 goals scored per match, and notably they have not had a single home match without scoring (0% matches without a goal). River Plate posts higher possession on the road (62%) and a comparable average of shots on target (4.29), yet in practice they only score 0.86 goals per away match, with a conversion rate of around 7% and 43% of away matches without a goal. Defensively River appears solid in results — conceding on average 0.57 goals away and keeping 43% clean sheets — however their away xG against is 1.30 versus 0.99 xG against for Racing at home, which suggests the visitors allow chances of higher xG value. Both teams are in form (Racing 8 goals and an average 2.4 points in the last 5; River 10 goals and 2.6 points), but the key advantages for the home side are more attempts (17.5 vs 12.71) and no home blanks (0% vs 43%). Based on this I assess the probabilities as: Racing win 50%, draw 27%, River win 23%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Racing ClubRiver Plate
12Shots10
Racing ClubRiver Plate
4Shots on target4
Racing ClubRiver Plate
1.46xG1.14
Racing ClubRiver Plate
8Corners2
Racing ClubRiver Plate
58Dangerous attacks30
Racing ClubRiver Plate
16Fouls7
Racing ClubRiver Plate
6Cards3
Racing ClubRiver Plate

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Racing ClubRiver Plate
1.06Goals scored / match1.45
Racing ClubRiver Plate
0.94Goals conceded / match0.85
Racing ClubRiver Plate
56%Average possession65%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
3.22Shots on target / match5.65
Racing ClubRiver Plate

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.89Shots per match16.75
Racing ClubRiver Plate
3.22Shots on target5.65
Racing ClubRiver Plate
8.9%Shot conversion8.7%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
56%Possession65%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
1.37xG for1.87
Racing ClubRiver Plate
1.26xG against1.09
Racing ClubRiver Plate

Shooting quality

Racing Club: BalancedRiver Plate: Dominant
Racing ClubRiver Plate
Accuracy (shots on target)27%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

River Plate is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Racing Club · 1.4 pts / match - River Plate

Racing Club
DDDWL
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-6
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-2
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
River Plate
LDWWL
Season result split
55% W15% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-6
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
LDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.08Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

River Plate is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - Racing Club · 1.45 goals / match - River Plate

River Plate is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Racing Club · 0.85 goals / match - River Plate

Racing Club scoring profile: strong

Racing Club scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while River Plate keeps a clean sheet in 45% (9 of 20 matches).

River Plate scoring profile: strong

River Plate scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Racing Club keeps a clean sheet in 39% (7 of 18 matches).

19Goals scored (season)29
Racing ClubRiver Plate
17Goals conceded (season)17
Racing ClubRiver Plate
2Average goals in match2.3
Racing ClubRiver Plate
4Goals scored (last 5)7
Racing ClubRiver Plate
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
Racing ClubRiver Plate

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal75%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
28%2 goals55%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
6%3 goals15%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
0%4 goals0%
Racing ClubRiver Plate

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal55%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
28%2 goals15%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
6%3 goals10%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
0%4 goals5%
Racing ClubRiver Plate

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time20%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
11%Scored in both halves45%
Racing ClubRiver Plate

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
60%BTTS - last 540%
Racing ClubRiver Plate

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Racing ClubRiver Plate

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Racing ClubRiver Plate

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing Club is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.39 pts / match - Racing Club · 1.3 pts / match - River Plate

Racing Club - half-time state
33% leading39% draw28% trailing
River Plate - half-time state
30% leading40% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.39Points per match (1st half)1.3
Racing ClubRiver Plate
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Racing ClubRiver Plate
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
Racing ClubRiver Plate
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.05
Racing ClubRiver Plate
72%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
61%No goal before half-time50%
Racing ClubRiver Plate

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)2.1
Racing ClubRiver Plate
0.56Goals scored (2nd half)0.95
Racing ClubRiver Plate
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.3
Racing ClubRiver Plate
1.17Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Racing ClubRiver Plate
50%Clean sheet after half-time80%
Racing ClubRiver Plate
56%No goal after half-time30%
Racing ClubRiver Plate

Racing Club - second-half results

22% W44% R33% P
25
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

River Plate - second-half results

60% W30% R10% P
26
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding183%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Racing Club - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
River Plate - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Racing Club
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
4
1
16-30
5
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
1
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

River Plate
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
7
1
46-60
4
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.15
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+133%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Racing Club

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

River Plate

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.78
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

Racing ClubLigaRiver Plate
Average goals in match 2.002.08 2.30
Both teams scored 50%45% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%34% 35%
Clean sheets 39%34% 45%
Goal before half-time 61%61% 80%
Goal after half-time 72%71% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.08
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
0.90
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Racing Club 2 - 0 - 0 River Plate. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Racing Club de Avellaneda
3 : 2
CA River Plate
River Plate
2 : 3
Racing Club

FAQ

What was the result of Racing Club vs River Plate?

The Primera División match finished Racing Club 0:2 River Plate. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Racing Club and River Plate?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Racing Club won 2, River Plate won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing Club vs River Plate?

Racing Club score 1.06 goals per game on average and River Plate 1.45. The Primera División average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Racing Club's matches and 35% of River Plate's.

What form are Racing Club and River Plate in?

Over the last 5 games Racing Club have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and River Plate 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing Club vs River Plate?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Racing Club vs River Plate: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.