Racing vs Boston River: match statistics
Racing vs Boston River: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Racing played against Boston River in Primera División (Uruguay). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Parque Osvaldo Roberto. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Racing has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Boston River has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Racing scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 0.74. Boston River scores 0.93 and allows 1.30. Games in this league average 2.34 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Racing's games and 44% of Boston River's. The Over 2.5 rates are 26% and 41%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Racing has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.30 per game. Racing takes 13.2 shots per game, while Boston River takes 10.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Racing leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. Boston River leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.59 after halftime.
When the teams score
Racing's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Boston River, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Primera División games average 2.34 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Racing sit 3rd, while Boston River are eighth, and the full-season record clearly favors the home side: 13 wins and just 4 defeats compared with the visitors’ 8 wins and 13 losses. At home, Racing win 57% of their matches, concede just 0.64 goals per game, and keep a clean sheet in 57% of fixtures. Boston River score only 0.86 goals per away match, fail to find the net in 43% of games, and lose 57% of their away fixtures. The hosts also create better chances, averaging 1.61 xG compared with Boston River’s 1.23, while their defense allows opponents just 1.08 xG versus 1.57 for the visitors. Both teams have scored 5 goals in their last five matches, but Racing have conceded only 2 during that period, further supporting the prediction of a controlled home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for BTTS - No is stronger, as Racing has recorded BTTS in only 38% of matches, with that figure dropping to 20% over the last 5 games. The hosts have been very solid without the ball recently, conceding just 2 goals in 5 appearances—an average of 0.4 per match—while keeping a clean sheet in 31% of their matches this season. Boston River scores an average of only 0.86 goals per match this season, and despite an xG of 1.23, their shot conversion rate is just 9%. The visitors have a weak defense, conceding an average of 1.71 goals, so Racing should have good chances of scoring; however, the more likely scenario is that at least one team—most notably Boston River—fails to score. Additionally, the teams’ combined seasonal BTTS rates of 38% and 50% do not exceed the league average of 49% in a way that supports a Goal/Goal scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams clearly limits the risk of a very high-scoring game: fewer than 3.5 goals were scored in 85% of Racing’s matches and 86% of Boston River’s. In their last five appearances, Racing scored 5 goals and conceded just 2, while Boston River also scored 5 and conceded 4, resulting in an average of only 3.2 total goals per match across both runs. Moreover, just 20% of each team’s last five matches went Over 2.5 goals. Although Boston River concedes an average of 1.71 goals, Racing scores only 1.00 goal per game this season and keeps a clean sheet in 31% of matches. The estimated total of 2.06 goals therefore indicates that the strongest edge lies with Under 3.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Racing victory at full-time, as the hosts have been level at the break in 54% of their matches, compared with 64% for Boston River. Recent form further points to a cautious start: both teams ended the first half level in 80% of their last five matches, while Racing scored just 0.2 goals before the break during this period. After half-time, the advantage should shift to the hosts, who concede an average of 0.46 goals in the second half, compared with 1.14 for Boston River. Racing are also in better form in terms of results, averaging 2.0 points over their last five matches versus 1.6 for their opponents, while Boston River have lost 57% of their matches throughout the season. Racing’s advantage in shots on target, 4.77 to 3.36, together with the visitors’ significantly weaker defensive efficiency, conceding an average of 1.71 goals per match, further supports a post-half-time turnaround. The recommended HT/FT selection is X/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Racing | Boston River | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Racing is 28% better for: goals scored per game.
1.19 goals / game - Racing · 0.93 goals / game - Boston River
Racing is 76% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.74 goals / game - Racing · 1.3 goals / game - Boston River
Racing scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 meczów), while Boston River keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 meczów).
Boston River scores in 52% of games (14 of 27 meczów), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 44% (12 of 27 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Racing
Over / Under - Boston River
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Racing is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.52 pts / game - Racing · 1.04 pts / game - Boston River
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Racing - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Boston River - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Racing
Boston River
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Racing | Liga | Boston River | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.93 | 2.34 | ▼ 2.22 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 26% | 44% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 29% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 66% | ▼ 52% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 72% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Racing's perspective: 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Boston River. Games average 1.60 goals, and both teams scored in 20% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Racing vs Boston River?
The Primera División match finished Racing 3:2 Boston River. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Racing and Boston River?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Racing won 4, Boston River won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Boston River?
Racing score 1.19 goals per game on average and Boston River 0.93. The Primera División average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Racing's matches and 44% of Boston River's.
What form are Racing and Boston River in?
Over the last 5 games Racing have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Boston River 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Boston River?
The statistical background for Racing vs Boston River — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


