Uruguay - Primera DivisiónParque Osvaldo RobertoData current as of October 31, 2026

Racing vs Cerro Largo: match statistics

Racing crest
Racing
3 : 1half-time 2:0
Cerro Largo crest
Cerro Largo

Racing vs Cerro Largo: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Racing played against Cerro Largo in Primera División (Uruguay). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Venue: Parque Osvaldo Roberto. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Racing has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Cerro Largo has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Racing scores 1.24 goals per game and allows 0.88. Cerro Largo scores 0.94 and allows 1.12. Games in this league average 2.38 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of Racing's games and 41% of Cerro Largo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 29%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Racing has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.24 per game. Racing takes 12.4 shots per game, while Cerro Largo takes 9.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Racing leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Cerro Largo leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.62 after halftime.

When the teams score

Racing's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Cerro Largo, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Primera División games average 2.38 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Racing have a clear home advantage: they have won 59% of their home matches, while Cerro Largo have lost 53% of their away games. The hosts average 1.47 goals scored and 0.71 conceded at home, whereas the visitors score just 0.71 goals and concede 1.29 on the road. The difference in chance quality is reflected in the xG figures: Racing generate 1.56 xG at home, while Cerro Largo concede 1.55 xG away. In addition, the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 53% of their home matches, and the visitors have failed to score in 47% of their away games. However, the last five matches do not give Racing a form edge—both teams have recorded one win, one draw and three losses—so a draw remains a realistic outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest indicator that at least one team will fail to score is Cerro Largo’s attack: the visitors average 0.71 goals per match and have failed to score in 47% of their games. Racing concede an average of 0.94 goals, further reducing the visitors’ chances of scoring. Both teams have scored in 47% of Racing’s matches and just 35% of Cerro Largo’s, both below the league average of 50%. Across their last 5 matches, the visitors averaged 0.8 goals, while their xG fell to 0.79; Racing, meanwhile, averaged 1.4 goals. Although Racing have recently conceded 1.6 goals per match, Cerro Largo’s weaker finishing makes BTTS - No—the outcome in which at least one team fails to score—the more likely pick.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to under 3.5 goals: this outcome occurred in 88% of Racing’s matches and in 88% of Cerro Largo’s matches as well. The hosts average 1.18 goals scored and 0.94 conceded, while the visitors score just 0.71 and concede 1.29. The visitors’ limited attacking potential is further reflected in the fact that they failed to score in 47% of their matches and averaged 0.8 goals across their last five. Although Racing’s last five matches averaged 3.0 total goals, only 20% of Cerro Largo’s recent games went over 2.5 goals; therefore, the projected total of 2.20 goals supports under 3.5 more convincingly than the more demanding under 2.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: across their last five matches, both teams averaged just 0.2 first-half goals, and neither led at the break even once. Over the season, Racing were drawing at half-time in 41% of their matches, compared with 29% for Cerro Largo, so this scenario is far from certain, but the recent form of both sides lends it support. After the break, the advantage shifts towards the home side, who average 0.88 goals in the second half compared with the visitors’ 0.35, while Cerro Largo concede an average of 0.71 goals after half-time. Racing have also scored 10 goals between the 76th and 90th minutes, while Cerro Largo have conceded six in that period, further supporting the X/1 HT/FT pick. Risk remains significant, as both teams have earned just 0.8 points per game across their last five matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

35Possession (%)65
RacingCerro Largo
8Shots7
RacingCerro Largo
6Shots on target3
RacingCerro Largo
1.28xG1.15
RacingCerro Largo
3Corners3
RacingCerro Largo
50Dangerous attacks68
RacingCerro Largo
20Fouls11
RacingCerro Largo
6Cards4
RacingCerro Largo

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

RacingCerro Largo
1.24Goals scored / game0.94
RacingCerro Largo
0.88Goals allowed / game1.12
RacingCerro Largo
50%Average possession50%
RacingCerro Largo
4.12Shots on target / game3.29
RacingCerro Largo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.44Shots per game9.53
RacingCerro Largo
4.12Shots on target3.29
RacingCerro Largo
9.9%Shot conversion9.9%
RacingCerro Largo
50%Possession50%
RacingCerro Largo
1.56xG for1.24
RacingCerro Largo
1.09xG against1.51
RacingCerro Largo

Shooting quality

Racing: BalancedCerro Largo: Balanced
RacingCerro Largo
Accuracy (shots on target)33%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Racing
LLLWD
Season result split
44% W35% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-12-7
1.68 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-5-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Cerro Largo
LLLDW
Season result split
26% W29% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-15
1.09 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-9
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing is 32% better for: goals scored per game.

1.24 goals / game - Racing · 0.94 goals / game - Cerro Largo

Racing is 27% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.88 goals / game - Racing · 1.12 goals / game - Cerro Largo

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 74% of games (25 of 34 games), while Cerro Largo keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 games).

Cerro Largo scoring profile: mixed

Cerro Largo scores in 62% of games (21 of 34 games), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 41% (14 of 34 games).

42Goals scored (season)32
RacingCerro Largo
30Goals conceded (season)38
RacingCerro Largo
2.12Average goals per game2.06
RacingCerro Largo
7Goals scored (last 5)4
RacingCerro Largo
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
RacingCerro Largo

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal62%
RacingCerro Largo
32%2 goals24%
RacingCerro Largo
15%3 goals9%
RacingCerro Largo
3%4 goals0%
RacingCerro Largo

How often they concede at least...

59%1 goal74%
RacingCerro Largo
21%2 goals29%
RacingCerro Largo
6%3 goals9%
RacingCerro Largo
3%4 goals0%
RacingCerro Largo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time9%
RacingCerro Largo
6%BTTS in both halves3%
RacingCerro Largo
18%Scored in both halves12%
RacingCerro Largo

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
RacingCerro Largo
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
RacingCerro Largo
40%BTTS - last 540%
RacingCerro Largo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
RacingCerro Largo
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time12%
RacingCerro Largo
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
RacingCerro Largo

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
RacingCerro Largo
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
RacingCerro Largo
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
RacingCerro Largo

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / game - Racing · 1.06 pts / game - Cerro Largo

Racing - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing
Cerro Largo - half-time state
24% leading35% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per game (1st half)1.06
RacingCerro Largo
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.32
RacingCerro Largo
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
RacingCerro Largo
1Average goals (1st half)0.85
RacingCerro Largo
65%Clean sheet before half-time53%
RacingCerro Largo
53%No goal before half-time68%
RacingCerro Largo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per game (2nd half)1.32
RacingCerro Largo
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
RacingCerro Largo
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
RacingCerro Largo
1.12Average goals (2nd half)1.21
RacingCerro Largo
68%Clean sheet after half-time56%
RacingCerro Largo
56%No goal after half-time59%
RacingCerro Largo

Racing - second-half results

29% W53% D18% L
47
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Cerro Largo - second-half results

35% W26% D38% L
36
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding108%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Racing - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.60
Goals scored / game0.21.2
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Cerro Largo - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.40
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Racing
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
7
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
4
3
46-60
9
4
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Cerro Largo
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
5
6
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
6
46-60
3
4
61-75
13
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.09
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Cerro Largo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

RacingLigaCerro Largo
Average goals per game▼ 2.122.38▼ 2.06
Both teams scored▼ 44%50%▼ 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 32%44%▼ 29%
Clean sheets▲ 41%29%▼ 26%
Goal before half-time▼ 62%67%▲ 71%
Goal after half-time▼ 59%73%▲ 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.38
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / game
1.06
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RacingGoalTomás Habib
  2. Cerro LargoYellow cardAlberto Sebastián Assis Silva
  3. Cerro LargoYellow cardAlberto Sebastián Assis Silva
  4. RacingYellow cardFelipe Martín Álvarez
  5. Cerro LargoYellow cardDiego Daguerre Irazabal
  6. Cerro LargoYellow cardMartín German Gianoli Abellan
  7. RacingYellow cardFranco Suárez Rodríguez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Racing's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Cerro Largo. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Racing
1 : 0
Cerro Largo
Cerro Largo
0 : 1
Racing
Cerro Largo Fútbol Club
2 : 2
Racing Club de Montevideo
Racing Club de Montevideo
1 : 1
Cerro Largo Fútbol Club

FAQ

What was the result of Racing vs Cerro Largo?

The Primera División match finished Racing 3:1 Cerro Largo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Racing and Cerro Largo?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Racing won 2, Cerro Largo won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Cerro Largo?

Racing score 1.24 goals per game on average and Cerro Largo 0.94. The Primera División average is 2.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Racing's matches and 41% of Cerro Largo's.

What form are Racing and Cerro Largo in?

Over the last 5 games Racing have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Cerro Largo 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Cerro Largo?

The statistical background for Racing vs Cerro Largo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.