Uruguay - Primera DivisiónParque Osvaldo RobertoData current as of 19 July 2026

Racing vs Defensor Sporting: match statistics

Racing crest
Racing
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Defensor Sporting crest
Defensor Sporting

Racing vs Defensor Sporting: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Racing play Defensor Sporting in Primera División (Uruguay). The match date is 30 May 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Parque Osvaldo Roberto. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Racing: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Defensor Sporting: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Racing scores 1.30 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Defensor Sporting scores 0.80 and concedes 0.85. League average: 2.40 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Racing 55%, Defensor Sporting 50%. Over 2.5: Racing 30%, Defensor Sporting 20%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Racing has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.47. Racing: 13.2 shots per match, Defensor Sporting: 12.2.

Match halves

Racing: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.65. Defensor Sporting: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Racing: 61-75 (6 goals). Defensor Sporting: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.40 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Racing has a strong home profile: 2nd in the table with a 56% home win rate, averaging 1.56 goals scored and 0.89 conceded per home match, and a +6 goal difference. Defensor Sporting sit 8th and win only 11% of away fixtures, averaging 0.67 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per away match, and failing to score in 44% of away games. Racing creates more quality chances: at home they average 12.44 shots (4.78 on target) with xG 1.57 and a 13% conversion rate, while Defensor average 9.67 shots (2.78 on target) with xG 1.21 and 7% conversion. In the last 5 matches Racing have 1.6 pts with a 2-2-1 record, scoring 3 and conceding 3, whereas Defensor have only 0.8 pts with a 1-1-3 record, scoring 4 and conceding 7. Considering Racing’s 0% of matches without a goal, the xG advantage (1.57 vs 1.21), higher conversion (13% vs 7%) and superior clean sheet rate (44% vs 11%), I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
RacingDefensor Sporting
24Shots7
RacingDefensor Sporting
1Shots on target2
RacingDefensor Sporting
2.25xG1.03
RacingDefensor Sporting
10Corners1
RacingDefensor Sporting
94Dangerous attacks61
RacingDefensor Sporting
12Fouls4
RacingDefensor Sporting
0Cards1
RacingDefensor Sporting

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

RacingDefensor Sporting
1.3Goals scored / match0.8
RacingDefensor Sporting
0.8Goals conceded / match0.85
RacingDefensor Sporting
48%Average possession54%
RacingDefensor Sporting
4.2Shots on target / match3.6
RacingDefensor Sporting

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.15Shots per match12.2
RacingDefensor Sporting
4.2Shots on target3.6
RacingDefensor Sporting
9.9%Shot conversion6.6%
RacingDefensor Sporting
48%Possession54%
RacingDefensor Sporting
1.61xG for1.47
RacingDefensor Sporting
1.08xG against1.55
RacingDefensor Sporting

Shooting quality

Racing: BalancedDefensor Sporting: Balanced
RacingDefensor Sporting
Accuracy (shots on target)32%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Racing is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Racing · 0.6 pts / match - Defensor Sporting

Racing
WDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W40% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-2
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-1
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Defensor Sporting
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W45% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-6
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-6-4
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Racing is 63% better for: goals scored per match.

1.3 goals / match - Racing · 0.8 goals / match - Defensor Sporting

Racing is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Racing · 0.85 goals / match - Defensor Sporting

Racing scoring profile: very strong

Racing scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Defensor Sporting keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).

Defensor Sporting scoring profile: strong

Defensor Sporting scores in 65% of matches (13 of 20 matches), while Racing keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

26Goals scored (season)16
RacingDefensor Sporting
16Goals conceded (season)17
RacingDefensor Sporting
2.1Average goals in match1.65
RacingDefensor Sporting
3Goals scored (last 5)3
RacingDefensor Sporting
2Goals conceded (last 5)6
RacingDefensor Sporting

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal65%
RacingDefensor Sporting
30%2 goals15%
RacingDefensor Sporting
10%3 goals0%
RacingDefensor Sporting
5%4 goals0%
RacingDefensor Sporting

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal70%
RacingDefensor Sporting
10%2 goals15%
RacingDefensor Sporting
5%3 goals0%
RacingDefensor Sporting
5%4 goals0%
RacingDefensor Sporting

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Defensor Sporting - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 20 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time30%
RacingDefensor Sporting
5%BTTS in both halves0%
RacingDefensor Sporting
20%Scored in both halves15%
RacingDefensor Sporting

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
RacingDefensor Sporting
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
RacingDefensor Sporting
40%BTTS - last 560%
RacingDefensor Sporting

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
RacingDefensor Sporting
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
RacingDefensor Sporting
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
RacingDefensor Sporting

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
RacingDefensor Sporting
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time15%
RacingDefensor Sporting
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
RacingDefensor Sporting

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Racing is 89% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / match - Racing · 0.9 pts / match - Defensor Sporting

Racing - half-time state
40% leading50% draw10% trailing
Defensor Sporting - half-time state
5% leading75% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)0.9
RacingDefensor Sporting
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.35
RacingDefensor Sporting
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
RacingDefensor Sporting
1Average goals (1st half)0.85
RacingDefensor Sporting
70%Clean sheet before half-time50%
RacingDefensor Sporting
40%No goal before half-time65%
RacingDefensor Sporting

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.5
RacingDefensor Sporting
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
RacingDefensor Sporting
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.35
RacingDefensor Sporting
1.1Average goals (2nd half)0.8
RacingDefensor Sporting
65%Clean sheet after half-time70%
RacingDefensor Sporting
55%No goal after half-time55%
RacingDefensor Sporting

Racing - second-half results

30% W45% R25% P
34
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Defensor Sporting - second-half results

35% W45% R20% P
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding500%

Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Racing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.40.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Defensor Sporting - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Racing
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
6
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Defensor Sporting
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
78%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Racing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Defensor Sporting

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

RacingLigaDefensor Sporting
Average goals in match 2.102.40 1.65
Both teams scored 55%53% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%45% 20%
Clean sheets 40%27% 30%
Goal before half-time 65%69% 55%
Goal after half-time 65%73% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.40
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.32
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Racing 0 - 1 - 2 Defensor Sporting. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Racing Club de Montevideo
1 : 1
Defensor Sporting Club
Racing Club de Montevideo
0 : 1
Defensor Sporting Club
Defensor Sporting Club
2 : 0
Racing Club de Montevideo

FAQ

What was the result of Racing vs Defensor Sporting?

The Primera División match finished Racing 0:0 Defensor Sporting. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Racing and Defensor Sporting?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Racing won 0, Defensor Sporting won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Racing vs Defensor Sporting?

Racing score 1.30 goals per game on average and Defensor Sporting 0.80. The Primera División average is 2.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Racing's matches and 50% of Defensor Sporting's.

What form are Racing and Defensor Sporting in?

Over the last 5 games Racing have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Defensor Sporting 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Racing vs Defensor Sporting?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Racing vs Defensor Sporting: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.