Radnik Surdulica vs Čukarički: match statistics
Radnik Surdulica vs Čukarički: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Radnik Surdulica played against Čukarički in SuperLiga (Serbia). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Gradski Stadion Čair. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Radnik Surdulica has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Čukarički has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Radnik Surdulica scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.50. Čukarički scores 1.29 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Radnik Surdulica's games and 14% of Čukarički's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 57%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Radnik Surdulica has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.23 per game. Radnik Surdulica takes 14.7 shots per game, while Čukarički takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Radnik Surdulica leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Čukarički leads at halftime in 57% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Radnik Surdulica's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For Čukarički, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
SuperLiga games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Radnik Surdulica remain unbeaten at home, winning 67% of their matches and conceding just 0.67 goals per game on average. The hosts create significantly more chances, with an average xG of 2.15 compared to Čukarički’s 1.00, while their shot volume stands at 18.67 per match versus 9.00 for the visitors. Čukarički do score 1.33 goals per away game, but they fail to find the net in as many as 33% of those matches. Their defense also allows opponents an xG of around 1.90 and concedes an average of 2 goals. Both teams have collected 7 points from their last 5 matches, but Radnik’s advantage in possession—55% compared to 37%—and their more solid home defense support a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Radnik have not recorded a single match with both teams scoring throughout the season, while Čukarički see this scenario in only 33% of their matches. The hosts keep a clean sheet in 50% of games, whereas the visitors fail to score in 33% of their appearances, clearly increasing the likelihood that one side will finish the match without a goal. Radnik’s recent form has been more open, with BTTS occurring in 60% of their last five matches, but the figure for Čukarički was just 20%. The visitors have conceded an average of 2.2 goals in their last five matches, yet their attacking xG stands at only 1.13, while Radnik average just 1.0 goal despite registering 1.46 xG. The league BTTS rate of 38% also confirms that a one-sided win with a clean sheet or a 0:0 draw is more likely than both teams finding the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The signal for at least two goals is strong, as Radnik have gone over the 1.5-goal line in 75% of their matches, while Čukarički have done so in 100% of their games. In their last five appearances, both teams have also recorded a high percentage of matches with at least three goals: 60% for the hosts and 80% for the visitors. The defenses allow numerous chances, as reflected by the average xG conceded of 1.87 for Radnik and 1.90 for Čukarički. The hosts generate an average of 1.42 xG, with 5.25 shots on target per match, while the visitors concede an average of 2.20 goals in their last five games. The Over 1.5 line offers a clearer edge than the higher thresholds, as it covers a 1:1 or 2:0 result with a projected total of 2.82 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Radnik have the clearer first-half edge: they have not conceded a single goal before the break in their last five matches and led at half-time in 60% of those games. Čukarički also tend to start well, leading at the break in 60% of their last five outings, but during this period they conceded an average of 0.6 goals before half-time, while the hosts scored 0.6. Radnik create more chances, averaging 5.25 shots on target compared with their opponents’ 3.0, while their xG stands at 1.42 versus Čukarički’s 1.00. After the interval, the visitors are particularly vulnerable to conceding, allowing an average of 1.67 goals, including 1.6 per match across their last five games, which strengthens the hosts’ chances of maintaining their lead. Although both teams have suffered defeat in 40% of their last five league matches, home advantage and Radnik’s greater post-break stability point primarily to an HT/FT scenario in which the hosts lead at half-time and go on to win the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Radnik Surdulica | Čukarički | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Čukarički is 29% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Radnik Surdulica · 1.29 goals / game - Čukarički
Radnik Surdulica is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Radnik Surdulica · 1.71 goals / game - Čukarički
Radnik Surdulica scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 games), while Čukarički keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 games).
Čukarički scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 games), while Radnik Surdulica keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Radnik Surdulica
Over / Under - Čukarički
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Radnik Surdulica is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Radnik Surdulica · 1.71 pts / game - Čukarički
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Radnik Surdulica - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Čukarički - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 43%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Radnik Surdulica
Čukarički
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Radnik Surdulica | Liga | Čukarički | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.50 | 2.48 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 37% | ▼ 14% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 36% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Radnik Surdulica's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against Čukarički. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Radnik Surdulica vs Čukarički?
The SuperLiga match finished Radnik Surdulica 3:1 Čukarički. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Radnik Surdulica and Čukarički?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Radnik Surdulica won 1, Čukarički won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Radnik Surdulica vs Čukarički?
Radnik Surdulica score 1.00 goals per game on average and Čukarički 1.29. The SuperLiga average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Radnik Surdulica's matches and 14% of Čukarički's.
What form are Radnik Surdulica and Čukarički in?
Over the last 5 games Radnik Surdulica have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Čukarički 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Radnik Surdulica vs Čukarički?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.