Radnik Surdulica vs Novi Pazar: match statistics
Radnik Surdulica vs Novi Pazar: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Radnik Surdulica played against Novi Pazar in SuperLiga (Serbia). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Venue: Gradski Stadion Čair. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Radnik Surdulica has 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.25 points per game. Novi Pazar has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Radnik Surdulica scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. Novi Pazar scores 0.80 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.32 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Radnik Surdulica's games and 20% of Novi Pazar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 20%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Radnik Surdulica has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.67 per game. Radnik Surdulica takes 16.5 shots per game, while Novi Pazar takes 14.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Radnik Surdulica leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Novi Pazar leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Radnik Surdulica's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For Novi Pazar, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
SuperLiga games average 2.32 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Radnik Surdulica have clear home-field advantages: they average 1.5 goals scored, create chances worth 2.24 xG and register as many as 20 shots per match at home. Novi Pazar are yet to score away, have failed to find the net in 100% of their away matches and have not won any of them, despite averaging 7 shots on target. The hosts control the flow of matches far more effectively, enjoying 60% possession compared with the visitors’ 54%, while their defense restricts opponents to just 0.82 xG. Radnik’s overall form across their last five matches is not ideal, having conceded 9 goals, but Novi Pazar’s poor away finishing should limit its impact. A narrow home win is the most likely outcome, although the high draw rates recorded by both teams in these conditions increase the chances of the points being shared.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Novi Pazar have yet to score away from home and finished without scoring in 100% of such matches. The hosts kept a clean sheet in 67% of their games, while the visitors have recorded 50% of matches without conceding, increasing the likelihood that at least one side will fail to score. The seasonal BTTS rate stands at just 33% for Radnik and 0% for Novi Pazar, compared with 35% for the league as a whole. The last five matches provide some arguments for Goal/Goal, as Radnik conceded an average of 1.8 goals, but both teams scored only 0.8 goals per game during this period. Despite the visitors' high xG of 1.96, their zero away-scoring rate and very low BTTS profile support a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The scoring profile clearly supports a low goal line: 67% of Radnik’s matches and all of Novi Pazar’s matches finished with fewer than 3.5 goals. The visitors are yet to score in their away fixtures, averaging 0.0 goals despite registering an average of 7.0 shots on target per match. Radnik have scored just 0.8 goals per game in their last five outings, while Novi Pazar have also averaged 0.8 goals over the same period. Higher xG figures—1.48 for the hosts and 1.96 for the visitors—suggest potential for goals, but their finishing so far, along with 100% of the visitors’ matches finishing below 2.5 goals, limits the likelihood of a four-goal outcome. With a projected total of 2.25 goals, the Under 3.5 goals market holds a clear betting edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Radnik Surdulica hold a clear advantage in the home data: they have won 67% of their matches, average 1.33 goals scored, and led at the break in 2 of 3 games. Novi Pazar have yet to score away from home, have not won a single match, and average 0.00 goals at half-time. The hosts have scored an average of 1.00 goal before the break, while the visitors have gone into half-time without scoring in 100% of their away matches. Radnik’s recent form is less convincing, as they have scored only 0.8 goals per game across their last five matches; however, Novi Pazar also average 0.8 goals, while their 1.96 xG and 7 shots on target have not translated into goals. The most likely outcome therefore remains a home lead at half-time followed by a home win, although Radnik’s high draw rate over their last five matches also increases the likelihood of an X/X scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Radnik Surdulica | Novi Pazar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.15 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Novi Pazar is 12% better for: last-5 form.
1.25 pts / game - Radnik Surdulica · 1.4 pts / game - Novi Pazar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Radnik Surdulica is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Radnik Surdulica · 0.8 goals / game - Novi Pazar
Radnik Surdulica is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Radnik Surdulica · 1.2 goals / game - Novi Pazar
Radnik Surdulica scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while Novi Pazar keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).
Novi Pazar scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while Radnik Surdulica keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Radnik Surdulica
Over / Under - Novi Pazar
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Radnik Surdulica is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Radnik Surdulica · 1.4 pts / game - Novi Pazar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Radnik Surdulica - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Novi Pazar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.3 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 25% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 25% |
| No goal | 75% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Radnik Surdulica
Novi Pazar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (SuperLiga).
Teams vs league
| Radnik Surdulica | Liga | Novi Pazar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.32 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 35% | ▼ 20% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 38% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 25% | 68% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Radnik Surdulica's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Novi Pazar. Games average 1.67 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Radnik Surdulica vs Novi Pazar?
The SuperLiga match finished Radnik Surdulica 1:0 Novi Pazar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Radnik Surdulica and Novi Pazar?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Radnik Surdulica won 2, Novi Pazar won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Radnik Surdulica vs Novi Pazar?
Radnik Surdulica score 1.00 goals per game on average and Novi Pazar 0.80. The SuperLiga average is 2.32 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Radnik Surdulica's matches and 20% of Novi Pazar's.
What form are Radnik Surdulica and Novi Pazar in?
Over the last 5 games Radnik Surdulica have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and Novi Pazar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Radnik Surdulica vs Novi Pazar?
The statistical background for Radnik Surdulica vs Novi Pazar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.