Morocco - Botola ProStade Mohamed VData current as of September 06, 2026

Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: match statistics

Raja Casablanca crest
Raja Casablanca
1 : 1half-time 0:0
UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat

Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Raja Casablanca played against UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on June 14, 2026. Venue: Stade Mohamed V. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Raja Casablanca has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. UTS Rabat has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Raja Casablanca scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 0.48. UTS Rabat scores 1.00 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.12 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 22% of Raja Casablanca's games and 65% of UTS Rabat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 13% and 30%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Raja Casablanca has the higher season xG average, 1.40 to 1.24 per game. Raja Casablanca takes 11.0 shots per game, while UTS Rabat takes 9.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Raja Casablanca leads at halftime in 52% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.48 after halftime.

When the teams score

Raja Casablanca's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For UTS Rabat, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.12 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1): Raja possess a phenomenal home defense — conceding just 0.33 goals per match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of games, which significantly limits opponents’ opportunities. At home Raja averages xG 1.58, 12.83 shots and 4.58 on target, while UTS away posts xG 1.38, 10.18 shots and 4.27 on target with 45% possession (Raja 62%), so the hosts create more chances and control the match. In attacking efficiency both teams are similar: Raja scores 1.25 goals at home with a 10% conversion rate, and UTS records 1.09 goals away with an 11% conversion, therefore defensive advantage and possession will be decisive. Recent form is mixed — UTS has 1.4 points per game in the last 5 matches versus Raja’s 1.2, but the hosts win 58% of home games compared to UTS’s 27% away win rate. Considering the difference in average goals conceded (0.33 vs 1.36) along with Raja’s higher xG and match control, I estimate probabilities of 65% for Raja, 20% for a draw and 15% for a UTS win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators show a clear propensity for both teams to score: Raja 67% and UTS 64%, both above the league average of 50%. Clean sheets are rare: only 8% of Raja’s matches and 9% of UTS’s matches end with that team keeping a clean sheet, meaning they concede in 91–92% of games. Chance metrics confirm offensive potential on both sides — xG 1.13 for Raja versus 1.38 for UTS, xG conceded around 1.46–1.47, and on average 3.17 shots on target for Raja and 4.27 for UTS — UTS creates more chances, but both teams pose opportunities. There is short-term risk: in the last 5 matches Raja has 0% BTTS, scored only 3 goals (0.6 per game) with xG 1.37, indicating finishing issues; UTS in the last 5 scored 6 and conceded 6 (1.2 per game) and had 40% BTTS. Considering the dominant seasonal signal 67%/64%, low clean sheets 8–9% and the generated xG, I assess BTTS probability at 70% (not 30%) and tip 'BTTS - Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected goals estimate based on xG is 1.30 for Raja (xG attack 1.13 vs xG defense UTS 1.47) and 1.42 for UTS (xG attack 1.38 vs xG defense Raja 1.46), totaling 2.72 goals. With lambda = 2.72 the Poisson distribution yields ~75.5% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~51% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~29% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Additionally, seasonal indicators support Over 1.5: Raja has 83% of home matches with >1.5, UTS 73% away, and both-teams-to-score occurrences are 67% and 64% respectively. Matches above 2.5 account for only 25% for Raja and 36% for UTS, and above 3.5 are 17% and 9%, making Over 2.5 and Over 3.5 less reliable. Therefore the strongest and best-justified signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Visitors look stronger over the full 90 minutes: UTS Rabat averages 1.18 points per match versus 0.58 for Raja and has a 27% win rate this season compared to 0% for the home side, favoring an away win. At half-time a draw is more likely – the hosts were level at the break in 67% of home games, and first-half goals average 1.0 for the home team and 1.45 for the visitors, indicating a moderate number of goals in the opening 45 minutes. UTS’s offensive edge is reflected in xG of 1.38 versus 1.13 for Raja and in average shots 10.18 vs 8.17, so the visitors have the tools to turn the game in the second half. In the last five matches UTS scored 9 first-half goals compared to 3 for the hosts, although the hosts keep a first-half clean sheet in 58% of home games, which increases the likelihood of a draw at the break. On this basis the strongest signal is a Half-Time draw and an away win after 90 minutes (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
10Shots10
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
4Shots on target8
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.37xG1.61
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
6Corners4
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
63Dangerous attacks58
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
18Fouls16
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
5Cards3
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.13Goals scored / game1
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.48Goals allowed / game1.43
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
60%Average possession46%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
4.09Shots on target / game3.7
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game9.13
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
4.09Shots on target3.7
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
10.3%Shot conversion11%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
60%Possession46%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.4xG for1.24
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.02xG against1.46
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

Shooting quality

Raja Casablanca: BalancedUTS Rabat: Balanced
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)37%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

UTS Rabat is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Raja Casablanca · 1.4 pts / game - UTS Rabat

Raja Casablanca
WLWLL
Season result split
52% W26% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-5
1.83 pts / game · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
UTS Rabat
LLWDW
Season result split
13% W48% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-11-9
0.87 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Raja Casablanca is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.13 goals / game - Raja Casablanca · 1 goals / game - UTS Rabat

Raja Casablanca is 198% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.48 goals / game - Raja Casablanca · 1.43 goals / game - UTS Rabat

Raja Casablanca scoring profile: very strong

Raja Casablanca scores in 70% of games (16 of 23 meczów), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 meczów).

UTS Rabat scoring profile: mixed

UTS Rabat scores in 70% of games (16 of 23 meczów), while Raja Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 61% (14 of 23 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)23
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
11Goals conceded (season)33
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
1.61Average goals per game2.43
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal70%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
30%2 goals22%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
9%3 goals9%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
4%4 goals0%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

39%1 goal91%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
9%2 goals30%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0%3 goals13%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0%4 goals9%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time30%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0%BTTS in both halves9%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
30%Scored in both halves13%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

9%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0%BTTS - last 540%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
4%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Raja Casablanca is 92% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - Raja Casablanca · 1.04 pts / game - UTS Rabat

Raja Casablanca - half-time state
52% leading43% draw4% trailing
UTS Rabat - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)1.04
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.57Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.04Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.61Average goals (1st half)1.22
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
96%Clean sheet before half-time48%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
48%No goal before half-time61%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

1.48Points per game (2nd half)1
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.74
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
1Average goals (2nd half)1.22
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
65%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat
52%No goal after half-time57%
Raja CasablancaUTS Rabat

Raja Casablanca - second-half results

35% W43% R22% P
46
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

UTS Rabat - second-half results

17% W48% R35% P
24
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 13%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Raja Casablanca - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.60.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
UTS Rabat - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game1.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.80.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Raja Casablanca
ScoredConceded
5
0
0-15
5
0
16-30
3
1
31-45
4
2
46-60
2
4
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
11
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
5
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.02
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Raja Casablanca

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Raja CasablancaLigaUTS Rabat
Average goals per game 1.612.12 2.43
Both teams scored 22%50% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 13%37% 30%
Clean sheets 61%31% 9%
Goal before half-time 57%61% 61%
Goal after half-time 65%72% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.12
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / game
1.01
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Raja CasablancaYellow cardAyoub Maamouri
  2. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Mohamed Es SahelOff: Omar Arjoune
  3. UTS RabatYellow cardYacine Bammou
  4. Raja CasablancaYellow cardMathias Oyewusi Kehinde
  5. UTS RabatYellow cardTakha Majni
  6. Raja CasablancaYellow cardBesar Halimi
  7. Raja CasablancaYellow cardMehdi Lamchkhchakh
  8. Raja CasablancaGoalBesar Halimi
  9. Raja CasablancaYellow cardIsmail Khafi
  10. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Youssef KajaiOff: Mehdi Assahabi
  11. UTS RabatYellow cardMohamed Fouzair

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Raja Casablanca's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against UTS Rabat. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished Raja Casablanca 1:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?

Raja Casablanca score 1.13 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Raja Casablanca's matches and 65% of UTS Rabat's.

What form are Raja Casablanca and UTS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games Raja Casablanca have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and UTS Rabat 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat?

The statistical background for Raja Casablanca vs UTS Rabat — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.