Scotland - PremiershipIbrox StadiumData current as of October 15, 2026

Rangers vs Kilmarnock: match statistics

Rangers crest
Rangers
3 : 1half-time 3:0
Kilmarnock crest
Kilmarnock

Rangers vs Kilmarnock: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rangers played against Kilmarnock in Premiership (Scotland). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Ibrox Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Rangers has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Kilmarnock has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Rangers scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 0.57. Kilmarnock scores 0.86 and allows 2.14. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of Rangers's games and 43% of Kilmarnock's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 43%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rangers has the higher season xG average, 2.20 to 1.17 per game. Rangers takes 20.4 shots per game, while Kilmarnock takes 9.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Rangers leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Kilmarnock leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.43 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rangers's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Kilmarnock, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Premiership games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rangers have won their last five matches, scoring 8 goals and conceding just 1, while Kilmarnock have recorded one win and scored 3 goals over the same period. At home, Rangers average 23.67 shots per match, compared with 10 shots for Kilmarnock away, and their xG stands at 2.55 against 1.30 for their opponents. However, Rangers score an average of just 1 goal at home, so their high volume of chances does not always translate into goals. The hosts’ defense concedes an average of 0.67 goals at home, while Kilmarnock allow opponents an xG of 1.83 on the road. Rangers’ advantage in form and chance creation points to a home win, although their limited finishing leaves the door open for a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No: Rangers have conceded just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2, while Kilmarnock have scored an average of 0.6 goals over that period. Across those same five games, both teams scored in 20% of Rangers’ matches and 40% of Kilmarnock’s, below the league average of 52%. The case for a home goal is supported by Rangers’ average of 1.6 goals and an xG of 2.0 in their last five matches, compared with the 1.66 xG conceded by the visitors. Although Rangers have conceded an average of 2.75 goals at home, their recent defensive form and Kilmarnock’s lower scoring efficiency make it more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last 5 matches, Rangers averaged 1.6 goals scored and conceded just 0.2, while Kilmarnock averaged 0.6 goals scored and 0.6 conceded. The hosts’ attacking potential is reflected in an average xG of 2.00, but their opponents allowed chances worth 1.66 xG during this period, which does not point to an easy, high-scoring game. None of Kilmarnock’s last 5 matches went over 2.5 goals, while this happened in 40% of Rangers’ matches. With a projected total of 2.4 goals, Under 3.5 offers a greater safety margin than Under 2.5, even though the hosts could score more than once.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Rangers win: Kilmarnock were level at the break in 2 of their 3 away matches, while a half-time draw occurred twice in the teams’ last 5 matches each. The case for a home win is supported by Rangers’ current form—they have won their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.6 goals and conceding 0.2, while the visitors have won 1 of 5 and averaged 0.6 goals. Rangers won the second half in 3 of those 5 matches, whereas Kilmarnock did not win it once, reinforcing the prospect of the match being decided after the break. However, the venue-specific results temper confidence in this pick: Rangers trailed at half-time in 3 of their 4 home matches and did not win any of them. I therefore rate a half-time draw more highly than a home lead at the break, but Rangers’ recent winning run tilts the full-time prediction in their favor.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
RangersKilmarnock
18Shots13
RangersKilmarnock
4Shots on target5
RangersKilmarnock
1.85xG1.39
RangersKilmarnock
7Corners3
RangersKilmarnock
60Dangerous attacks30
RangersKilmarnock
15Fouls13
RangersKilmarnock
1Cards1
RangersKilmarnock

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

RangersKilmarnock
1.14Goals scored / game0.86
RangersKilmarnock
0.57Goals allowed / game2.14
RangersKilmarnock
54%Average possession42%
RangersKilmarnock
6.71Shots on target / game3.86
RangersKilmarnock

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

20.43Shots per game9.86
RangersKilmarnock
6.71Shots on target3.86
RangersKilmarnock
5.6%Shot conversion8.7%
RangersKilmarnock
54%Possession42%
RangersKilmarnock
2.2xG for1.17
RangersKilmarnock
1.02xG against1.98
RangersKilmarnock

Shooting quality

Rangers: AttackingKilmarnock: Balanced
RangersKilmarnock
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.170.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rangers is 200% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - Rangers · 1 pts / game - Kilmarnock

Rangers
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
71% W14% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-1
2.29 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
LWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Kilmarnock
LLDWD
Season result split
14% W29% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-4
0.71 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rangers is 33% better for: goals scored per game.

1.14 goals / game - Rangers · 0.86 goals / game - Kilmarnock

Rangers is 275% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.57 goals / game - Rangers · 2.14 goals / game - Kilmarnock

Rangers scoring profile: very strong

Rangers scores in 100% of games (7 of 7 games), while Kilmarnock keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).

Kilmarnock scoring profile: mixed

Kilmarnock scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 games), while Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 games).

8Goals scored (season)6
RangersKilmarnock
4Goals conceded (season)15
RangersKilmarnock
1.71Average goals per game3
RangersKilmarnock
6Goals scored (last 5)2
RangersKilmarnock
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
RangersKilmarnock

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal57%
RangersKilmarnock
14%2 goals14%
RangersKilmarnock
0%3 goals14%
RangersKilmarnock
0%4 goals0%
RangersKilmarnock

How often they concede at least...

43%1 goal71%
RangersKilmarnock
14%2 goals43%
RangersKilmarnock
0%3 goals43%
RangersKilmarnock
0%4 goals43%
RangersKilmarnock

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
RangersKilmarnock
0%BTTS in both halves14%
RangersKilmarnock
14%Scored in both halves14%
RangersKilmarnock

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
RangersKilmarnock
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
RangersKilmarnock
20%BTTS - last 520%
RangersKilmarnock

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
RangersKilmarnock
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
RangersKilmarnock
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
RangersKilmarnock

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
RangersKilmarnock
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
RangersKilmarnock
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
RangersKilmarnock

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rangers is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / game - Rangers · 1.14 pts / game - Kilmarnock

Rangers - half-time state
29% leading43% draw29% trailing
Kilmarnock - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per game (1st half)1.14
RangersKilmarnock
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.43
RangersKilmarnock
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)1.14
RangersKilmarnock
0.86Average goals (1st half)1.57
RangersKilmarnock
57%Clean sheet before half-time43%
RangersKilmarnock
57%No goal before half-time57%
RangersKilmarnock

After half-time (2nd half)

2.14Points per game (2nd half)0.43
RangersKilmarnock
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
RangersKilmarnock
0.14Goals conceded (2nd half)1
RangersKilmarnock
0.86Average goals (2nd half)1.43
RangersKilmarnock
86%Clean sheet after half-time43%
RangersKilmarnock
29%No goal after half-time71%
RangersKilmarnock

Rangers - second-half results

57% W43% D0% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding245%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kilmarnock - second-half results

0% W43% D57% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Rangers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.20
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.0
Average goals per game0.80.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kilmarnock - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.20.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rangers
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Kilmarnock
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.35
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+84%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
42%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Kilmarnock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
180%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premiership).

Teams vs league

RangersLigaKilmarnock
Average goals per game▼ 1.712.55▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 43%52%▼ 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 29%52%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▲ 57%26%▲ 29%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%79%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▼ 71%76%▼ 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / game
1.36
Away goals / game
+-13%
Home attack advantage
+-14%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RangersGoalRyan Don NaderiAssist: James Penrice
  2. RangersSubstitutionOn: Kosta NedeljkovićOff: Dujon Sterling
  3. KilmarnockYellow cardMichael Schjonning-Larsen
  4. RangersYellow cardKosta Nedeljković
  5. RangersSubstitutionOn: Findlay CurtisOff: Kevin Jesús Kelsy Genez
  6. KilmarnockSubstitutionOn: Nicky Serghei ClescencoOff: Erik Ring
  7. RangersSubstitutionOn: Tochi Phil ChukwuaniOff: Daniel Neill
  8. KilmarnockGoalNicky Serghei ClescencoAssist: Joe Hugill

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rangers's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Kilmarnock. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Rangers vs Kilmarnock?

The Premiership match finished Rangers 3:1 Kilmarnock. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rangers and Kilmarnock?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Rangers won 3, Kilmarnock won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rangers vs Kilmarnock?

Rangers score 1.14 goals per game on average and Kilmarnock 0.86. The Premiership average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Rangers's matches and 43% of Kilmarnock's.

What form are Rangers and Kilmarnock in?

Over the last 5 games Rangers have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Kilmarnock 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rangers vs Kilmarnock?

The statistical background for Rangers vs Kilmarnock — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.