Italy - Serie C Group AData current as of September 11, 2026

Renate vs Novara: match statistics

Renate crest
Renate
3 : 1half-time 1:1
Novara crest
Novara
135%(2.00)
X40%(3.25)
225%(3.30)

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced match with an edge for a draw. Renate shows solid home form with a 38% win rate and an average of 1.19 goals per match, but their recent results have been inconsistent. Novara is characterized by an exceptional tendency for draws, especially away (69% draws), which is a key factor in this prediction. The visitors are in good form with 1.8 points per match in their last five games and have not lost any of them. Renate has a slight advantage in xG (1.61 vs 1.34), but Novara's defensive solidity (44% clean sheets away) and their tendency to share points make a draw the most likely outcome of this match.

Renate vs Novara: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Renate played against Novara in Serie C Group A (Italy). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Renate has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Novara has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Renate scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 0.94. Novara scores 1.06 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.29 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 52% of Renate's games and 52% of Novara's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 27%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Renate has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.43 per game. Renate takes 11.8 shots per game, while Novara takes 11.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Renate leads at halftime in 52% of its games and scores 0.61 goals per game after halftime. Novara leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.55 after halftime.

When the teams score

Renate's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). For Novara, it is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie C Group A games average 2.29 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced match with an edge for a draw. Renate shows solid home form with a 38% win rate and an average of 1.19 goals per match, but their recent results have been inconsistent. Novara is characterized by an exceptional tendency for draws, especially away (69% draws), which is a key factor in this prediction. The visitors are in good form with 1.8 points per match in their last five games and have not lost any of them. Renate has a slight advantage in xG (1.61 vs 1.34), but Novara's defensive solidity (44% clean sheets away) and their tendency to share points make a draw the most likely outcome of this match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The data indicates moderate BTTS chances, but with a slight edge for the scenario where one of the teams fails to score. Novara has a very solid defense (0.81 goals conceded per match and 44% clean sheets), and in the last 5 matches they have conceded only 2 goals (0.4 per match), which supports the 'BTTS: No' pick. At the same time, the league and both teams' profiles suggest rather low scoring (Over 2.5: Renate 35%, Novara 19%), which often correlates with no BTTS. Renate has decent offensive parameters (xG for 1.52 per match, 4.24 shots on target per match), so the most realistic risk for the 'no' pick is a goal from the hosts combined with Novara failing to score. Novara is average in attack (0.94 goals per match), and Renate defensively concedes relatively little (0.94 goals conceded per match; xGA 1.09 per match), which limits the probability of both teams scoring. The last 5 matches of both sides have BTTS at only 40% each, which further strengthens the 'no' pick as more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The goal profile of both teams supports a low/moderate scoreline: Novara has a very high Under 2.5 (81%) and Under 3.5 (81%) rate, and Renate also frequently stays under 2.5 (65%) and 3.5 (76%). Seasonal goal averages are modest (Renate 1.18 scored at home, Novara 0.94 away) and both defenses look solid based on GA numbers (Renate 0.94, Novara 0.81). Although xG metrics suggest chance creation (Renate xG 1.52, Novara xG 1.34), shot conversion is average (10% and 9%), which limits the conversion of advantage into goals. Additionally, Novara has a high clean sheet percentage (44%) and in the last 5 matches conceded few goals (0.4), favoring a scenario with a maximum of 3 goals. Therefore, the strongest signal is the Under 3.5 line, which has the highest probability of realization with an expected 2.17 goals in the match.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is the high propensity for draws: Renate draws 53% of their matches, while Novara draws a significant 69%, which naturally boosts the X/X (draw/draw) variant. The first half is expected to be cautious and balanced, as Renate are level at the break in 65% of their games. Both teams have a low average of first-half goals (HT average: 1.00 vs 0.88) and high percentages of clean sheets at half-time (53% vs 69%). Novara defends solidly (0.81 goals conceded per match, 44% clean sheets overall), and in their last 5 matches, they have conceded an average of just 0.4 goals, limiting Renate's chances of holding a lead at the break or pulling away. On the other hand, Renate have better chance creation (xG for 1.52) and a stronger second half (1.71 points per game in second halves), making the X/1 (draw at HT, home win at FT) a realistic alternative. However, given the 'draw-prone' profiles of both sides, a draw after 90 minutes remains the most likely outcome. Additionally, low first-half over rates (Over 1.5 HT: 35% vs 19%) support the thesis of a prolonged level score.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

36Possession (%)64
RenateNovara
17Shots12
RenateNovara
5Shots on target3
RenateNovara
1.79xG1.28
RenateNovara
6Corners1
RenateNovara
51Dangerous attacks41
RenateNovara
7Fouls10
RenateNovara
1Cards2
RenateNovara

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.3Goals scored / game1.06
RenateNovara
0.94Goals allowed / game0.88
RenateNovara
48%Average possession51%
RenateNovara
4.27Shots on target / game4.03
RenateNovara

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.82Shots per game11.3
RenateNovara
4.27Shots on target4.03
RenateNovara
11%Shot conversion9.4%
RenateNovara
48%Possession51%
RenateNovara
1.52xG for1.43
RenateNovara
1.47xG against1.3
RenateNovara

Shooting quality

Renate: BalancedNovara: Balanced
RenateNovara
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Novara is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Renate · 1.8 pts / game - Novara

Renate
WWDDL
Season result split
42% W33% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-11-8
1.61 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-5
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Novara
DWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
24% W61% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-20-5
1.33 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-11-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Renate is 23% better for: goals scored per game.

1.3 goals / game - Renate · 1.06 goals / game - Novara

Novara is 7% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.94 goals / game - Renate · 0.88 goals / game - Novara

Renate scoring profile: very strong

Renate scores in 82% of games (27 of 33 meczów), while Novara keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 meczów).

Novara scoring profile: strong

Novara scores in 70% of games (23 of 33 meczów), while Renate keeps a clean sheet in 39% (13 of 33 meczów).

43Goals scored (season)35
RenateNovara
31Goals conceded (season)29
RenateNovara
2.24Average goals per game1.94
RenateNovara
9Goals scored (last 5)7
RenateNovara
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
RenateNovara

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal70%
RenateNovara
30%2 goals27%
RenateNovara
15%3 goals9%
RenateNovara
3%4 goals0%
RenateNovara

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal64%
RenateNovara
24%2 goals18%
RenateNovara
9%3 goals6%
RenateNovara
0%4 goals0%
RenateNovara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time21%
RenateNovara
0%BTTS in both halves0%
RenateNovara
27%Scored in both halves18%
RenateNovara

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
RenateNovara
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
RenateNovara
40%BTTS - last 540%
RenateNovara

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
RenateNovara
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
RenateNovara
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
RenateNovara

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
RenateNovara
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
RenateNovara
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
RenateNovara

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Renate is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.88 pts / game - Renate · 1.27 pts / game - Novara

Renate - half-time state
52% leading33% draw15% trailing
Novara - half-time state
24% leading55% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.88Points per game (1st half)1.27
RenateNovara
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.52
RenateNovara
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
RenateNovara
0.97Average goals (1st half)0.94
RenateNovara
73%Clean sheet before half-time61%
RenateNovara
36%No goal before half-time58%
RenateNovara

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per game (2nd half)1.52
RenateNovara
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
RenateNovara
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
RenateNovara
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1
RenateNovara
55%Clean sheet after half-time70%
RenateNovara
55%No goal after half-time55%
RenateNovara

Renate - second-half results

27% W48% D24% L
62
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 42%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Novara - second-half results

36% W42% D21% L
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Renate - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.00
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Novara - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.20
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.0
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Renate
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
9
3
16-30
7
2
31-45
11
7
46-60
3
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Novara
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
5
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
4
46-60
9
3
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.09
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
57%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Renate

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Novara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).

Teams vs league

RenateLigaNovara
Average goals per game 2.242.29 1.94
Both teams scored 52%50% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%41% 27%
Clean sheets 39%30% 36%
Goal before half-time 79%66% 61%
Goal after half-time 70%71% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.29
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.20
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NovaraYellow cardAdrian Cannavaro
  2. RenateGoalMichele Calì
  3. RenateYellow cardFrancesco Vassallo
  4. NovaraGoalEric Lanini
  5. NovaraYellow cardRiccardo Collodel
  6. NovaraSubstitutionOn: Leonardo Di CosmoOff: Gianmarco Basso
  7. RenateSubstitutionOn: Pasquale Ruiz GiraldoOff: Francesco Vassallo
  8. RenateGoalAndrea Bonetti
  9. NovaraSubstitutionOn: Thomas AlbertiOff: Adrian Cannavaro
  10. NovaraSubstitutionOn: Davide Dell'ErbaOff: Nicolò Ledonne
  11. RenateSubstitutionOn: Endri MuhametiOff: Joseph Ekuban
  12. RenateSubstitutionOn: Gianluca RossiOff: Andrea Delcarro

Head-to-head

Record from Renate's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Novara. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Renate vs Novara?

The Serie C Group A match finished Renate 3:1 Novara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Renate vs Novara?

Renate score 1.30 goals per game on average and Novara 1.06. The Serie C Group A average is 2.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Renate's matches and 52% of Novara's.

What form are Renate and Novara in?

Over the last 5 games Renate have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Novara 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Renate vs Novara?

The statistical background for Renate vs Novara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.