Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU: match statistics
Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rēzekne / BJSS played against Metta - LU in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Venue: OC Rēzekne Mākslīgais Laukums. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Rēzekne / BJSS has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Metta - LU has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.81 goals per game and allows 2.88. Metta - LU scores 4.31 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 3.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Rēzekne / BJSS's games and 56% of Metta - LU's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 88%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Metta - LU has the higher season xG average, 3.01 to 0.77 per game. Rēzekne / BJSS takes 2.9 shots per game, while Metta - LU takes 22.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Rēzekne / BJSS leads at halftime in 6% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Metta - LU leads at halftime in 81% and scores 1.75 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rēzekne / BJSS's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Metta - LU, it is minutes 31-45+ (18 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.60 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Metta - LU are top of the table with a record of 13 wins, 2 draws and just 1 defeat, while Rēzekne / BJSS sit 14th and have won only 1 of 16 matches. The visitors have scored 69 goals this season, including 28 in their last five games, whereas the hosts have managed just 4 goals over the same period and have failed to win any of those matches. Away from home, Metta - LU create significantly more chances, averaging 19.33 shots and an xG of 2.46, compared with 4.75 shots and an xG of 0.88 for Rēzekne / BJSS at home. The hosts concede an average of 2.75 goals per home match and have kept no clean sheets, while the visitors allow opponents just 0.86 goals and 0.89 xG away from home. The clear advantage in attacking quality, possession (61% to 44%) and defensive solidity strongly supports a convincing Metta - LU victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams regularly feature in matches with goals at both ends: this scenario occurred in 56% of Rēzekne / BJSS matches and 57% of Metta - LU games, compared with the league average of 63%. The hosts have not recorded a single goalless match this season and average as many as 5.67 goals at home, which is a strong argument against the visitors keeping a clean sheet. Metta - LU score an average of 2.57 goals away from home and as many as 5.6 across their last five matches, while Rēzekne / BJSS conceded 2.2 goals per game during this period. The hosts’ recent form has been weaker offensively, as they scored just 0.8 goals from an xG of 0.97, but their opponents concede an average of 1.4 goals and record 0.96 xG against. The combination of Metta’s very strong attack and Rēzekne’s high home scoring efficiency makes it more likely that both teams will score, supporting the BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal selection rather than BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Metta - LU are in very strong offensive form, averaging 5.6 goals scored over their last 5 matches, with an average xG of 2.92. During this period, Rēzekne / BJSS conceded 2.2 goals per match and allowed opponents an average of 1.76 xG, clearly favoring high attacking output from the visitors. The 1.5 line was surpassed in 100% of the hosts’ matches and 86% of Metta’s fixtures, while over 2.5 goals landed in 89% and 86% of their respective league matches. The hosts scored only 4 goals in their last 5 appearances, but Metta conceded an average of 1.4 goals, meaning Rēzekne could also contribute to the total. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as the visitors’ offensive advantage alone gives a high probability of at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal comes from current form: Rēzekne have failed to win any of their last five matches, scoring just 0.8 goals per game and conceding 2.2, while Metta - LU have averaged 5.6 goals and won 60% of those fixtures. At half-time, the hosts failed to score in any of these matches and were trailing in 75% of them, whereas the visitors held a lead at the break in 60% of their games, scoring an average of 3.2 goals. Metta - LU have also maintained their advantage after the interval, averaging 2.4 goals in the second half and winning it in 80% of their recent appearances, compared with just 0.75 goals for Rēzekne. Full-season data were more favourable to the hosts, but their recent decline from 5.67 to 0.8 goals per game is too pronounced. Therefore, the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at half-time and winning the match, namely 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rēzekne / BJSS | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 53% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.26 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.56 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Metta - LU is 1200% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Rēzekne / BJSS · 2.6 pts / game - Metta - LU
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Metta - LU is 432% better for: goals scored per game.
0.81 goals / game - Rēzekne / BJSS · 4.31 goals / game - Metta - LU
Metta - LU is 227% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.88 goals / game - Rēzekne / BJSS · 0.88 goals / game - Metta - LU
Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 meczów), while Metta - LU keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 meczów).
Metta - LU scores in 100% of games (16 of 16 meczów), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rēzekne / BJSS
Over / Under - Metta - LU
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Metta - LU is 412% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / game - Rēzekne / BJSS · 2.56 pts / game - Metta - LU
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 6%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Metta - LU - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 81% of games and wins 81%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 3.4 | 2.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 3.8 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +15 | +11 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (18 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rēzekne / BJSS
Metta - LU
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rēzekne / BJSS | Liga | Metta - LU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.69 | 3.60 | ▲ 5.19 |
| Both teams scored | • 63% | 64% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 69% | ▲ 88% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 20% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | • 75% | 76% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 81% | 85% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Rēzekne / BJSS's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Metta - LU. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU?
The 1. Liga match finished Rēzekne / BJSS 0:2 Metta - LU. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU?
Rēzekne / BJSS score 0.81 goals per game on average and Metta - LU 4.31. The 1. Liga average is 3.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Rēzekne / BJSS's matches and 56% of Metta - LU's.
What form are Rēzekne / BJSS and Metta - LU in?
Over the last 5 games Rēzekne / BJSS have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Metta - LU 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Metta - LU: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


