Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 23 July 2026

Rēzekne / BJSS vs Tukums II: match statistics

Rēzekne / BJSS crest
Rēzekne / BJSS
1 : 4half-time 1:1
Tukums II crest
Tukums II

Rēzekne / BJSS vs Tukums II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Rēzekne / BJSS play Tukums II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 16 May 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:4.

Current form

Rēzekne / BJSS: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Tukums II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Rēzekne / BJSS scores 0.77 and concedes 2.85 goals per match. Tukums II scores 1.38 and concedes 2.38. League average: 3.43 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Rēzekne / BJSS 54%, Tukums II 77%. Over 2.5: Rēzekne / BJSS 69%, Tukums II 69%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums II has higher xG: 1.57 vs 0.74. Rēzekne / BJSS: 3.2 shots per match, Tukums II: 10.5.

Match halves

Rēzekne / BJSS: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.46. Tukums II: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.92.

Goals by minute

Rēzekne / BJSS: 46-60 (3 goals). Tukums II: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Rēzekne/BJSS have yet to win this season (0-1-6), scoring 4 and conceding 23, which at home translates to an average of 1.00 goals scored and 3.33 conceded per match. Tukums II sit on 1-1-4, 8 scored and 14 conceded; their away averages are 1.5 goals scored and 3.00 conceded, and they earn on average 0.8 points per match in the last 5 fixtures versus the hosts’ 0.2, so they are superior in attack and recent form (1.5 vs 1.0 goals). Visitors also post a higher xG (1.24) than the home side at home (1.02), have better shooting efficiency (19% vs 17%) and have not had an away clean sheet (0% matches without a goal vs 33% for the hosts), indicating better quality of chances and conversion. Both teams are defensively vulnerable: the hosts conceded 17 goals in their last 5 matches, the visitors 11, and the total goals per match average is 4.33 for the hosts and 4.5 for the visitors, suggesting an open, high-scoring game. Considering Tukums II’s advantage in xG, higher away goal average (1.5 vs 1.0) and their consistent scoring on the road, I assign 55% probability to the visitors, 25% to a draw and 20% to Rēzekne/BJSS.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
-1Shots-1
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
-1Shots on target-1
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
0xG0
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
-1Corners-1
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
0Dangerous attacks0
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
-1Fouls-1
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
-1Cards-1
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
0.77Goals scored / match1.38
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
2.85Goals conceded / match2.38
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
31%Average possession42%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
1.62Shots on target / match4.69
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.23Shots per match10.46
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
1.62Shots on target4.69
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
23.8%Shot conversion13.2%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
31%Possession42%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
0.74xG for1.57
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
2.31xG against1.79
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

Shooting quality

Rēzekne / BJSS: Counter-attackingTukums II: Counter-attacking
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
Accuracy (shots on target)50%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.230.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Rēzekne / BJSS is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 0.6 pts / match - Tukums II

Rēzekne / BJSS
WLLDL
Season result split
8% W15% R77% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-10
0.38 pts / match · goal difference -27
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tukums II
LLLLW
Season result split
23% W15% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-8
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums II is 79% better for: goals scored per match.

0.77 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 1.38 goals / match - Tukums II

Tukums II is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.85 goals / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 2.38 goals / match - Tukums II

Rēzekne / BJSS scoring profile: strong

Rēzekne / BJSS scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Rēzekne / BJSS keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 matches).

10Goals scored (season)18
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
37Goals conceded (season)31
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
3.62Average goals in match3.77
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
10Goals conceded (last 5)15
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

How often they score at least...

54%1 goal92%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
23%2 goals31%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
0%3 goals8%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
0%4 goals8%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal85%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
69%2 goals69%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
54%3 goals46%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
38%4 goals23%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time31%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
15%Scored in both halves15%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS69%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
60%BTTS - last 560%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
69%Min. 2 goals after half-time69%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
46%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tukums II is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.54 pts / match - Rēzekne / BJSS · 0.77 pts / match - Tukums II

Rēzekne / BJSS - half-time state
8% leading31% draw62% trailing
Tukums II - half-time state
15% leading31% draw54% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.54Points per match (1st half)0.77
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0.46
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)1.08
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.54
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
31%Clean sheet before half-time31%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
77%No goal before half-time62%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

After half-time (2nd half)

0.77Points per match (2nd half)1.08
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
0.46Goals scored (2nd half)0.92
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
1.54Goals conceded (2nd half)1.31
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
2Average goals (2nd half)2.23
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
31%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II
62%No goal after half-time31%
Rēzekne / BJSSTukums II

Rēzekne / BJSS - second-half results

15% W31% R54% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tukums II - second-half results

31% W15% R54% P
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Rēzekne / BJSS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tukums II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match1.02.0
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Rēzekne / BJSS
ScoredConceded
2
12
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
8
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.69
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Rēzekne / BJSS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
42%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
178%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Rēzekne / BJSSLigaTukums II
Average goals in match 3.623.43 3.77
Both teams scored 54%60% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%68% 69%
Clean sheets 0%23% 15%
Goal before half-time 77%71% 77%
Goal after half-time 77%84% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.43
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.60
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
35%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Rēzekne / BJSS 1 - 1 - 0 Tukums II. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
1 : 2
FK Rēzekne FA / BJSS
FK Rēzekne FA / BJSS
1 : 1
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II

FAQ

What was the result of Rēzekne / BJSS vs Tukums II?

The 1. Liga match finished Rēzekne / BJSS 1:4 Tukums II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rēzekne / BJSS and Tukums II?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rēzekne / BJSS won 1, Tukums II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rēzekne / BJSS vs Tukums II?

Rēzekne / BJSS score 0.77 goals per game on average and Tukums II 1.38. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Rēzekne / BJSS's matches and 77% of Tukums II's.

What form are Rēzekne / BJSS and Tukums II in?

Over the last 5 games Rēzekne / BJSS have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Tukums II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Tukums II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rēzekne / BJSS vs Tukums II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.