RFC Seraing vs RWDM: match statistics
RWDM demonstrates a clear advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics. The visitors score an average of 1.63 goals per away match compared to just 1.13 for RFC Seraing at home, while also maintaining better shot conversion (12% vs 10%) and dominating possession (52% vs 40%). RFC Seraing shows alarming form with only one win in the last five matches and a 50% loss rate in home games this season. RWDM has a positive goal difference away (+1) unlike the hosts (-2 at home) and a higher away win percentage (38% vs 25% for the hosts). The table position (15th place RFC Seraing vs 11th place RWDM) further confirms the advantage of the visitors, who, despite variable form in the last five matches, possess significantly better xG parameters (1.51 vs 1.32). All these factors point to a likely victory for RWDM, although the weak defense of both teams could lead to a draw.
RFC Seraing vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
RFC Seraing played against RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on January 16, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
RFC Seraing has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. RWDM has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
RFC Seraing scores 0.88 goals per game and allows 1.65. RWDM scores 1.67 and allows 1.72. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of RFC Seraing's games and 56% of RWDM's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 61%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
RWDM has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.37 per game. RFC Seraing takes 12.4 shots per game, while RWDM takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
RFC Seraing leads at halftime in 6% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. RWDM leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
RFC Seraing's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For RWDM, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RWDM demonstrates a clear advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics. The visitors score an average of 1.63 goals per away match compared to just 1.13 for RFC Seraing at home, while also maintaining better shot conversion (12% vs 10%) and dominating possession (52% vs 40%). RFC Seraing shows alarming form with only one win in the last five matches and a 50% loss rate in home games this season. RWDM has a positive goal difference away (+1) unlike the hosts (-2 at home) and a higher away win percentage (38% vs 25% for the hosts). The table position (15th place RFC Seraing vs 11th place RWDM) further confirms the advantage of the visitors, who, despite variable form in the last five matches, possess significantly better xG parameters (1.51 vs 1.32). All these factors point to a likely victory for RWDM, although the weak defense of both teams could lead to a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| RFC Seraing | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
RWDM is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - RFC Seraing · 1 pts / game - RWDM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 90% better for: goals scored per game.
0.88 goals / game - RFC Seraing · 1.67 goals / game - RWDM
RFC Seraing scores in 59% of games (10 of 17 meczów), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 meczów).
RWDM scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 meczów), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RFC Seraing
Over / Under - RWDM
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RWDM is 140% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.65 pts / game - RFC Seraing · 1.56 pts / game - RWDM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RFC Seraing - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 12%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 28%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
RFC Seraing
RWDM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RFC Seraing | Liga | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.53 | 2.76 | ▲ 3.39 |
| Both teams scored | • 53% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 51% | ▲ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 27% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 73% | • 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 79% | ▲ 94% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from RFC Seraing's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against RWDM. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of RFC Seraing vs RWDM?
The First Division B match finished RFC Seraing 3:1 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RFC Seraing vs RWDM?
RFC Seraing score 0.88 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.67. The First Division B average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 53% of RFC Seraing's matches and 56% of RWDM's.
What form are RFC Seraing and RWDM in?
Over the last 5 games RFC Seraing have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RWDM 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RFC Seraing vs RWDM?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RFC Seraing vs RWDM: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.