Latvia - VirsligaData current as of September 06, 2026

Riga vs Auda: match statistics

Riga crest
Riga
4 : 1half-time 2:1
Auda crest
Auda

Riga vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Riga played against Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 12, 2026. Final score: 4:1.

Recent form

Riga has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Auda has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Riga scores 3.27 goals per game and allows 1.18. Auda scores 2.27 and allows 1.09. Games in this league average 3.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 64% of Riga's games and 73% of Auda's. The Over 2.5 rates are 91% and 73%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Riga has the higher season xG average, 2.01 to 1.70 per game. Riga takes 16.6 shots per game, while Auda takes 13.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Riga leads at halftime in 64% of its games and scores 1.73 goals per game after halftime. Auda leads at halftime in 55% and scores 1.18 after halftime.

When the teams score

Riga's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Auda, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 3.00 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Riga has a clear advantage in chance creation — at home they average 19.5 shots, 6.25 on target, scoring 3.0 goals per match with xG 2.27, while Auda away posts 13.83 shots, 4.83 on target, 1.83 goals and xG 1.63. Auda’s defense looks solid with only 0.83 goals conceded away versus Riga’s 1.25 conceded at home, but xG against comparison shows Riga allows 0.79 xG (Auda 0.94), meaning Riga concedes 0.46 more goals than xG suggests, while Auda defends 0.11 better than xG indicates. Both teams are in excellent form (Riga 4 wins and 1 draw in last 5, Auda 4 wins and 1 draw; both averaging 2.6 points per game) and scored 14 and 15 goals respectively in their last 5 matches. With superior possession (66% vs 58%), higher shot conversion (15% vs 13%) and greater xG (2.27 vs 1.63), the home side appear to have a marginal edge, so I forecast a Riga victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong signal for BTTS comes from seasonal indicators: Riga has BTTS at 80%, Auda 67%, both above the league average of 57%. In the last 5 matches Auda shows BTTS 80% versus 40% for Riga, but both teams have been scoring heavily recently — Riga scored 14 goals in 5 matches (avg 2.8), Auda 15 goals (avg 3.0) — and conceded 4 and 5 goals respectively. xG and shot metrics confirm goal potential: Riga generates 1.79 xG with xG against 1.23, Auda 1.63 xG with xG against 0.94; Riga averages 5.6 shots on target with a 20% conversion, Auda 4.83 with a 13% conversion. Seasonal clean sheet rates are low: 20% for Riga and 33% for Auda, while season tallies are 36 scored/13 conceded for Riga and 25/12 for Auda, further increasing the likelihood of goal exchange; therefore I recommend BTTS "Yes" with a probability of 78% versus 22% for "No".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Riga has a very offensive profile: they score an average of 2.8 goals per match and this season 100% of their games have gone Over 2.5, while Auda averages 3.0 goals in their last 5 matches and 50% of their season matches are over 2.5. Based on xG, Riga have xG 1.79 versus xG conceded by Auda 0.94, giving an expected 1.37 goals for the home side; Auda have xG 1.63 versus xG conceded by Riga 1.23, giving 1.43 for the visitors. The expected total is 2.80 goals, and the league average is 3.04 goals per match, which further supports Over markets; in the last 5 matches of both teams Over 2.5 occurred in 80% of cases. Riga average 5.6 shots on target with 20% conversion, Auda 4.83 shots on target with 13% conversion, and BTTS occurs in 80% of Riga’s season matches and 67% of Auda’s, increasing the likelihood of goal exchange. Therefore the best pick is Over 2.5 (back Over) — roughly 78% probability — because the expected total of 2.80 and Riga’s historical 100% of matches over 2.5 provide the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back HT/FT 1/2: Riga leads at the break, Auda wins after full-time. Riga leads at half-time in 60% of matches and scores an average of 1.4 goals in the first half. Riga also has higher average xG (1.79 vs 1.63 for Auda) and a seasonal goals-per-game average of 2.8 versus 1.83 for the visitors, which increases the hosts’ chance to take a lead before the break. However, Auda has an 83% win rate this season, averages 2.0 points in second halves and wins 50% of second halves, while Riga averages only 1.2 points and wins just 20% of second halves, suggesting a possible turnaround after the break. Additionally, Auda defends solidly (concedes 0.83 goals per game on average with 0.94 xG against), whereas Riga is more efficient with shots (conversion rate 20% vs 13%), which together indicate an early lead for the hosts and a greater probability that the visitors will take control by full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
RigaAuda
16Shots4
RigaAuda
7Shots on target1
RigaAuda
2.08xG0.67
RigaAuda
7Corners1
RigaAuda
82Dangerous attacks46
RigaAuda
16Fouls11
RigaAuda
4Cards5
RigaAuda

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

3.27Goals scored / game2.27
RigaAuda
1.18Goals allowed / game1.09
RigaAuda
65%Average possession59%
RigaAuda
6.55Shots on target / game5.18
RigaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.55Shots per game13.91
RigaAuda
6.55Shots on target5.18
RigaAuda
19.8%Shot conversion16.3%
RigaAuda
65%Possession59%
RigaAuda
2.01xG for1.7
RigaAuda
0.96xG against1.07
RigaAuda

Shooting quality

Riga: DominantAuda: Efficient finishing
RigaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)40%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Riga
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
73% W18% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-1
2.36 pts / game · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Auda
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
73% W9% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-2
2.27 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 0.80BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 44% better for: goals scored per game.

3.27 goals / game - Riga · 2.27 goals / game - Auda

Auda is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.18 goals / game - Riga · 1.09 goals / game - Auda

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 100% of games (11 of 11 meczów), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 meczów).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 100% of games (11 of 11 meczów), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 meczów).

36Goals scored (season)25
RigaAuda
13Goals conceded (season)12
RigaAuda
4.45Average goals per game3.36
RigaAuda
14Goals scored (last 5)15
RigaAuda
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
RigaAuda

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
RigaAuda
82%2 goals73%
RigaAuda
73%3 goals18%
RigaAuda
36%4 goals9%
RigaAuda

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal73%
RigaAuda
36%2 goals27%
RigaAuda
18%3 goals9%
RigaAuda
0%4 goals0%
RigaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time36%
RigaAuda
18%BTTS in both halves0%
RigaAuda
73%Scored in both halves55%
RigaAuda

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
RigaAuda
27%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
RigaAuda
40%BTTS - last 580%
RigaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
RigaAuda
73%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
RigaAuda
36%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
RigaAuda

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
RigaAuda
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
RigaAuda
45%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
RigaAuda

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.09 pts / game - Riga · 1.91 pts / game - Auda

Riga - half-time state
64% leading18% draw18% trailing
Auda - half-time state
55% leading27% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.09Points per game (1st half)1.91
RigaAuda
1.55Goals scored (1st half)1.09
RigaAuda
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
RigaAuda
2.09Average goals (1st half)1.64
RigaAuda
55%Clean sheet before half-time55%
RigaAuda
18%No goal before half-time18%
RigaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

2.18Points per game (2nd half)1.64
RigaAuda
1.73Goals scored (2nd half)1.18
RigaAuda
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
RigaAuda
2.36Average goals (2nd half)1.73
RigaAuda
55%Clean sheet after half-time55%
RigaAuda
9%No goal after half-time27%
RigaAuda

Riga - second-half results

64% W27% R9% P
23
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at halftime in 64% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Auda - second-half results

36% W55% R9% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 55% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Riga - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.60
Goals scored / game1.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.81.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+5+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Auda - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.20
Goals scored / game1.41.6
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game2.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Riga
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
8
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Auda
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
7
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.91
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.2 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
130%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
206%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

RigaLigaAuda
Average goals per game 4.453.00 3.36
Both teams scored 64%59% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 91%52% 73%
Clean sheets 36%22% 27%
Goal before half-time 91%74% 91%
Goal after half-time 91%86% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / game
1.41
Away goals / game
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+-10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Riga's perspective: 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Auda. Games average 4.20 goals, and both teams scored in 80% of them.

Auda
1 : 2
Riga
Riga FC
6 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Riga FC
FK Auda Riga
1 : 3
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 2
FK Auda Riga

FAQ

What was the result of Riga vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished Riga 4:1 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Auda?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Riga won 4, Auda won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Auda?

Riga score 3.27 goals per game on average and Auda 2.27. The Virsliga average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Riga's matches and 73% of Auda's.

What form are Riga and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Auda 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Auda?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.