Riga vs Grobiņa: match statistics
Riga vs Grobiņa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Riga play Grobiņa in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 29 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Grobiņa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Riga scores 2.95 and concedes 0.86 goals per match. Grobiņa scores 0.68 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Riga 55%, Grobiņa 36%. Over 2.5: Riga 82%, Grobiņa 23%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Riga has higher xG: 2.02 vs 1.14. Riga: 16.9 shots per match, Grobiņa: 9.0.
Match halves
Riga: half-time lead 73%, second-half goals 1.36. Grobiņa: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.27.
Goals by minute
Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). Grobiņa: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
5 H2H matches: 4-1-0. Average goals 2.40, BTTS 20%.
Match description
Riga is the clear favorite: at home they average 3.0 goals per match (48 goals in the season, 15 in the last 5), while Grobiņa averages 0.86 goals away (10 goals in the season, 4 in the last 5). The difference in quality of chances is significant — Riga records an average xG of 2.24 at home versus Grobiņa’s 1.27 xG away, with average shots 19 vs 10.29 and shots on target 6 vs 3.43 per match. The home defense also looks superior: Riga concedes 1.14 goals per home match and has 43% clean sheets, while Grobiņa concedes 1.57 goals away and has 29% clean sheets. Form further favors the hosts — Riga have won 4 of their last 5 matches and average 2.6 points per match in the last 5, whereas Grobiņa have not won any of their last 5 (0-3-2) and average 0.6 points per match. Considering the advantage in goal difference (+13 for the hosts vs -5 for the visitors), higher efficiency (16% shot conversion rate vs 8%) and greater possession (65% vs 46%), I predict a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Riga | Grobiņa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Riga is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Riga · 1.4 pts / match - Grobiņa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 334% better for: goals scored per match.
2.95 goals / match - Riga · 0.68 goals / match - Grobiņa
Riga is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.86 goals / match - Riga · 1.5 goals / match - Grobiņa
Riga scores in 95% of matches (21 of 22 matches), while Grobiņa keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).
Grobiņa scores in 50% of matches (11 of 22 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Riga
Over / Under — Grobiņa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 121% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.32 pts / match - Riga · 1.05 pts / match - Grobiņa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Riga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 73% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Grobiņa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +8 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Riga
Grobiņa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Riga | Liga | Grobiņa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.82 | 2.99 | ▼ 2.18 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 55% | 57% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 82% | 55% | ▼ 23% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 23% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 91% | 75% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 85% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Riga 4 - 1 - 0 Grobiņa. Average goals 2.40, both teams scored in 20% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Riga vs Grobiņa?
The Virsliga match finished Riga 2:0 Grobiņa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Grobiņa?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Riga won 4, Grobiņa won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Grobiņa?
Riga score 2.95 goals per game on average and Grobiņa 0.68. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Riga's matches and 36% of Grobiņa's.
What form are Riga and Grobiņa in?
Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Grobiņa 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Grobiņa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.