Latvia - VirsligaSporta komplekss ĶeizarmežsData current as of 22 July 2026

Riga vs Super Nova: match statistics

Riga crest
Riga
3 : 0half-time 3:0
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

Riga vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Riga play Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Sporta komplekss Ķeizarmežs. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Riga: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Riga scores 2.96 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.09 and concedes 1.52. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Riga 57%, Super Nova 61%. Over 2.5: Riga 83%, Super Nova 57%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Riga has higher xG: 2.03 vs 1.19. Riga: 17.1 shots per match, Super Nova: 9.0.

Match halves

Riga: half-time lead 70%, second-half goals 1.43. Super Nova: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.52.

Goals by minute

Riga: 31-45+ (16 goals). Super Nova: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 5-0-0. Average goals 4.60, BTTS 60%.

Match description

Riga are clear favorites: they have 10 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss this season, sitting 2nd, while Super Nova have 6 wins, 2 draws and 6 losses (4th). The home attack is markedly stronger — Riga score 3.00 goals per home match and have 13 goals in the last 5 matches (2.6 per match) with an average xG of 2.31, while visitors average 1.13 goals away and have 7 in the last 5 (1.4 per match) with xG 1.14. Riga generate significantly more chances: 19.83 shots and 6.33 on target per match and 65% possession, versus 8.13 shots, 3.5 on target and 44% possession for the away side, translating into higher-quality opportunities. Super Nova are relatively tight away (0.88 goals conceded on average and 38% clean sheets), but Riga at home concede only 0.75 xG against and have 0% home matches without scoring, so the hosts have the edge in creating and converting chances. Given the xG gap (2.31 vs 1.14), the shot differential (19.83 vs 8.13) and recent form over the last 5 matches (Riga 2.6 points per match vs Super Nova 1.4), the prediction is a home win.

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
RigaSuper Nova
14Shots10
RigaSuper Nova
4Shots on target2
RigaSuper Nova
1.78xG1.11
RigaSuper Nova
1Corners8
RigaSuper Nova
86Dangerous attacks47
RigaSuper Nova
12Fouls8
RigaSuper Nova
3Cards1
RigaSuper Nova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.96Goals scored / match1.09
RigaSuper Nova
0.87Goals conceded / match1.52
RigaSuper Nova
63%Average possession45%
RigaSuper Nova
6.43Shots on target / match3.61
RigaSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.13Shots per match9.04
RigaSuper Nova
6.43Shots on target3.61
RigaSuper Nova
17.3%Shot conversion12%
RigaSuper Nova
63%Possession45%
RigaSuper Nova
2.03xG for1.19
RigaSuper Nova
0.94xG against1.67
RigaSuper Nova

Shooting quality

Riga: DominantSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
RigaSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)38%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Riga is 117% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Riga · 1.2 pts / match - Super Nova

Riga
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
78% W17% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-4-1
2.52 pts / match · goal difference +48
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-2-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 2.07Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Super Nova
LLWLW
Season result split
35% W13% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-12
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 172% better for: goals scored per match.

2.96 goals / match - Riga · 1.09 goals / match - Super Nova

Riga is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.87 goals / match - Riga · 1.52 goals / match - Super Nova

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: strong

Super Nova scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 43% (10 of 23 matches).

68Goals scored (season)25
RigaSuper Nova
20Goals conceded (season)35
RigaSuper Nova
3.83Average goals in match2.61
RigaSuper Nova
12Goals scored (last 5)6
RigaSuper Nova
1Goals conceded (last 5)10
RigaSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal78%
RigaSuper Nova
87%2 goals26%
RigaSuper Nova
65%3 goals4%
RigaSuper Nova
30%4 goals0%
RigaSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal78%
RigaSuper Nova
22%2 goals48%
RigaSuper Nova
9%3 goals13%
RigaSuper Nova
0%4 goals9%
RigaSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time30%
RigaSuper Nova
9%BTTS in both halves0%
RigaSuper Nova
61%Scored in both halves9%
RigaSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
RigaSuper Nova
26%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
RigaSuper Nova
20%BTTS - last 560%
RigaSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
RigaSuper Nova
70%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
RigaSuper Nova
35%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
RigaSuper Nova

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
RigaSuper Nova
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
RigaSuper Nova
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
RigaSuper Nova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 113% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.22 pts / match - Riga · 1.04 pts / match - Super Nova

Riga - half-time state
70% leading13% draw17% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
17% leading52% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.22Points per match (1st half)1.04
RigaSuper Nova
1.52Goals scored (1st half)0.57
RigaSuper Nova
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
RigaSuper Nova
2Average goals (1st half)1.39
RigaSuper Nova
61%Clean sheet before half-time52%
RigaSuper Nova
22%No goal before half-time57%
RigaSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

2.22Points per match (2nd half)1.22
RigaSuper Nova
1.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
RigaSuper Nova
0.39Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
RigaSuper Nova
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.22
RigaSuper Nova
70%Clean sheet after half-time48%
RigaSuper Nova
22%No goal after half-time57%
RigaSuper Nova

Riga - second-half results

65% W26% R9% P
51
Half-time points
35
Half-time goals
+24
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+24
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at half-time in 70% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - second-half results

35% W17% R48% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding206%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Riga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.20
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+5+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Riga
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
12
3
16-30
16
4
31-45
9
4
46-60
8
3
61-75
16
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +14 - wins late phases.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
4
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.22
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.93
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
177%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

RigaLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match 3.832.98 2.61
Both teams scored 57%56% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 83%55% 57%
Clean sheets 43%24% 22%
Goal before half-time 91%75% 61%
Goal after half-time 83%84% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Riga 5 - 0 - 0 Super Nova. Average goals 4.60, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Super Nova
1 : 4
Riga
SK Super Nova
2 : 6
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 0
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 5
Riga FC
Riga FC
2 : 0
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Riga vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished Riga 3:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Riga and Super Nova?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Riga won 5, Super Nova won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Riga vs Super Nova?

Riga score 2.96 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.09. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Riga's matches and 61% of Super Nova's.

What form are Riga and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games Riga have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Super Nova 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Riga vs Super Nova?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Riga vs Super Nova: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.