Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of August 31, 2026

Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts: match statistics

Rīgas FS II crest
Rīgas FS II
1 : 3half-time 1:1
JDFS Alberts crest
JDFS Alberts

Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rīgas FS II played against JDFS Alberts in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Recent form

Rīgas FS II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. JDFS Alberts has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Rīgas FS II scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 2.75. JDFS Alberts scores 2.00 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 3.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Rīgas FS II's games and 75% of JDFS Alberts's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 63%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JDFS Alberts has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.40 per game. Rīgas FS II takes 9.8 shots per game, while JDFS Alberts takes 13.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 38% and scores 1.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rīgas FS II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For JDFS Alberts, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.59 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JDFS Alberts sit 5th, while Rīgas FS II are only 10th, with the visitors’ overall season record standing at 8 wins and 4 losses compared with the hosts’ 4 wins and 9 defeats. The visitors are also in significantly more stable form: they have collected 8 points from their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 2 draws, whereas Rīgas FS II have managed only 4 points and conceded as many as 20 goals. Away from home, Alberts average 1.88 goals scored with an xG of 1.65, while the hosts concede 2.25 goals per match at home and allow opponents an xG of 1.89. Alberts’ defense also looks stronger, with their average away xG conceded standing at 1.17 compared with the 1.54 xG generated by Rīgas FS II at home. The hosts can score an average of 1.50 goals per match, but a run of 3 defeats in their last 5 outings, combined with their extremely poor defensive record, points towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - Yes is that 100% of JDFS Alberts’ matches have seen both teams score, alongside the team’s failure to keep even a single clean sheet. Rīgas FS II average 2.13 goals and 7.5 shots on target per match, while the visitors concede an average of 1.88 goals. JDFS Alberts score an average of 1.88 goals, and the hosts’ defense has been particularly vulnerable recently, conceding as many as 4.0 goals per match across their previous five games. The current BTTS indicators also support the Goal/Goal option: they stand at 80% in Rīgas FS II’s last five matches and 60% for JDFS Alberts, compared with the league average of 63%. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 38% of their games this season, so even with a clear attacking advantage, they have limited grounds for completely shutting out the visitors.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Rīgas FS II average 2.13 goals at home, while JDFS Alberts concede as many as 1.88 goals away, clearly supporting high attacking activity from the hosts. The visitors score an average of 1.88 goals, while in their last five matches, Rīgas FS II allowed opponents as many as 4.0 goals per game. The 1.5 line was exceeded in 88% of the hosts’ matches and in 100% of JDFS Alberts’ games, while the league averages 3.58 goals per match. Additionally, both teams scored in both halves in 50% and 100% of their matches, respectively, while this scenario occurred in 80% of the hosts’ last five games. Over 1.5 goals is therefore strongly supported by both the consistency of the results and Rīgas FS II’s recent defensive weakness.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

JDFS Alberts have the stronger recent run, averaging 1.6 points over their last five matches compared with just 0.8 for Rīgas FS II, who lost 60% of those games. The hosts have been particularly unstable before half-time, conceding an average of 2.4 goals in the first halves during this sequence and trailing at the break in 40% of matches. Alberts led after 45 minutes in 40% of their last five appearances, while Rīgas FS II did so in only 20%, strengthening the scenario of the visitors taking the lead from the outset. After the interval, the visitors won 60% of their recent second halves, whereas the hosts conceded as many as 4.0 goals per match across their last five games. Therefore, the most likely outcome is Alberts holding their lead through to the final whistle, supporting the HT/FT 2/2 scenario. The hosts’ season-long figures are superior, scoring 2.13 goals per match compared with the opponents’ 1.88, but their poor current defensive form significantly reduces the importance of this advantage.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
8Shots13
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
3Shots on target5
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
1.01xG1.78
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
2Corners8
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
40Dangerous attacks86
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
8Fouls11
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
0Cards0
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
1.44Goals scored / game2
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
2.75Goals allowed / game1.44
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
45%Average possession54%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
3.75Shots on target / game5.81
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.81Shots per game13.31
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
3.75Shots on target5.81
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
14.6%Shot conversion15%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
45%Possession54%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
1.4xG for1.8
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
1.84xG against1.25
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS II: Counter-attackingJDFS Alberts: Efficient finishing
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
Accuracy (shots on target)38%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

JDFS Alberts is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.6 pts / game - JDFS Alberts

Rīgas FS II
DLWLL
Season result split
25% W19% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-9
0.94 pts / game · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 4.0xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
JDFS Alberts
LWDDW
Season result split
50% W25% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-4
1.75 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JDFS Alberts is 39% better for: goals scored per game.

1.44 goals / game - Rīgas FS II · 2 goals / game - JDFS Alberts

JDFS Alberts is 91% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.75 goals / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.44 goals / game - JDFS Alberts

Rīgas FS II scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS II scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).

JDFS Alberts scoring profile: very strong

JDFS Alberts scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 meczów), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)32
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
44Goals conceded (season)23
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
4.19Average goals per game3.44
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
20Goals conceded (last 5)7
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal88%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
31%2 goals50%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
25%3 goals31%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
13%4 goals19%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal81%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
69%2 goals38%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
44%3 goals13%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
19%4 goals13%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time19%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
31%Scored in both halves25%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
80%BTTS - last 560%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
81%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS II is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.44 pts / game - JDFS Alberts

Rīgas FS II - half-time state
38% leading44% draw19% trailing
JDFS Alberts - half-time state
38% leading31% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per game (1st half)1.44
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
0.94Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.44
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
63%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
38%No goal before half-time56%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per game (2nd half)1.81
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)1.25
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
1.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
2.44Average goals (2nd half)2
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
25%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts
63%No goal after half-time31%
Rīgas FS IIJDFS Alberts

Rīgas FS II - second-half results

25% W19% R56% P
25
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.9

Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

JDFS Alberts - second-half results

50% W31% R19% P
23
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Rīgas FS II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game2.41.6
Average goals per game3.22.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-8-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
JDFS Alberts - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rīgas FS II
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
5
16-30
4
7
31-45
1
6
46-60
4
9
61-75
5
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

JDFS Alberts
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
7
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
3
6
46-60
8
5
61-75
9
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.81
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rīgas FS II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.91
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
173%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

JDFS Alberts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FS IILigaJDFS Alberts
Average goals per game 4.193.59 3.44
Both teams scored 63%63% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%69% 63%
Clean sheets 13%21% 19%
Goal before half-time 69%75% 69%
Goal after half-time 88%86% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.59
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.00
Home goals / game
1.59
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rīgas FS II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against JDFS Alberts. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

JDFS Alberts
2 : 0
Rīgas FS II
JDFS Alberts
2 : 1
FK Rīgas Futbola skola II
FK Rīgas Futbola skola II
0 : 2
JDFS Alberts

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts?

The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 1:3 JDFS Alberts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS II and JDFS Alberts?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS II won 0, JDFS Alberts won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts?

Rīgas FS II score 1.44 goals per game on average and JDFS Alberts 2.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 75% of JDFS Alberts's.

What form are Rīgas FS II and JDFS Alberts in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and JDFS Alberts 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.