Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts: match statistics
Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rīgas FS II played against JDFS Alberts in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
Rīgas FS II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. JDFS Alberts has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Rīgas FS II scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 2.75. JDFS Alberts scores 2.00 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 3.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Rīgas FS II's games and 75% of JDFS Alberts's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 63%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JDFS Alberts has the higher season xG average, 1.80 to 1.40 per game. Rīgas FS II takes 9.8 shots per game, while JDFS Alberts takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 38% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rīgas FS II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For JDFS Alberts, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.59 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JDFS Alberts sit 5th, while Rīgas FS II are only 10th, with the visitors’ overall season record standing at 8 wins and 4 losses compared with the hosts’ 4 wins and 9 defeats. The visitors are also in significantly more stable form: they have collected 8 points from their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 2 draws, whereas Rīgas FS II have managed only 4 points and conceded as many as 20 goals. Away from home, Alberts average 1.88 goals scored with an xG of 1.65, while the hosts concede 2.25 goals per match at home and allow opponents an xG of 1.89. Alberts’ defense also looks stronger, with their average away xG conceded standing at 1.17 compared with the 1.54 xG generated by Rīgas FS II at home. The hosts can score an average of 1.50 goals per match, but a run of 3 defeats in their last 5 outings, combined with their extremely poor defensive record, points towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - Yes is that 100% of JDFS Alberts’ matches have seen both teams score, alongside the team’s failure to keep even a single clean sheet. Rīgas FS II average 2.13 goals and 7.5 shots on target per match, while the visitors concede an average of 1.88 goals. JDFS Alberts score an average of 1.88 goals, and the hosts’ defense has been particularly vulnerable recently, conceding as many as 4.0 goals per match across their previous five games. The current BTTS indicators also support the Goal/Goal option: they stand at 80% in Rīgas FS II’s last five matches and 60% for JDFS Alberts, compared with the league average of 63%. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in only 38% of their games this season, so even with a clear attacking advantage, they have limited grounds for completely shutting out the visitors.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Rīgas FS II average 2.13 goals at home, while JDFS Alberts concede as many as 1.88 goals away, clearly supporting high attacking activity from the hosts. The visitors score an average of 1.88 goals, while in their last five matches, Rīgas FS II allowed opponents as many as 4.0 goals per game. The 1.5 line was exceeded in 88% of the hosts’ matches and in 100% of JDFS Alberts’ games, while the league averages 3.58 goals per match. Additionally, both teams scored in both halves in 50% and 100% of their matches, respectively, while this scenario occurred in 80% of the hosts’ last five games. Over 1.5 goals is therefore strongly supported by both the consistency of the results and Rīgas FS II’s recent defensive weakness.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
JDFS Alberts have the stronger recent run, averaging 1.6 points over their last five matches compared with just 0.8 for Rīgas FS II, who lost 60% of those games. The hosts have been particularly unstable before half-time, conceding an average of 2.4 goals in the first halves during this sequence and trailing at the break in 40% of matches. Alberts led after 45 minutes in 40% of their last five appearances, while Rīgas FS II did so in only 20%, strengthening the scenario of the visitors taking the lead from the outset. After the interval, the visitors won 60% of their recent second halves, whereas the hosts conceded as many as 4.0 goals per match across their last five games. Therefore, the most likely outcome is Alberts holding their lead through to the final whistle, supporting the HT/FT 2/2 scenario. The hosts’ season-long figures are superior, scoring 2.13 goals per match compared with the opponents’ 1.88, but their poor current defensive form significantly reduces the importance of this advantage.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS II | JDFS Alberts | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
JDFS Alberts is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.6 pts / game - JDFS Alberts
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JDFS Alberts is 39% better for: goals scored per game.
1.44 goals / game - Rīgas FS II · 2 goals / game - JDFS Alberts
JDFS Alberts is 91% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.75 goals / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.44 goals / game - JDFS Alberts
Rīgas FS II scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 meczów).
JDFS Alberts scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 meczów), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
Over / Under - JDFS Alberts
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS II is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / game - Rīgas FS II · 1.44 pts / game - JDFS Alberts
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 3.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rīgas FS II
JDFS Alberts
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS II | Liga | JDFS Alberts | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.19 | 3.59 | ▼ 3.44 |
| Both teams scored | • 63% | 63% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 69% | ▼ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 21% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 75% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 86% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Rīgas FS II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against JDFS Alberts. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts?
The 1. Liga match finished Rīgas FS II 1:3 JDFS Alberts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS II and JDFS Alberts?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS II won 0, JDFS Alberts won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts?
Rīgas FS II score 1.44 goals per game on average and JDFS Alberts 2.00. The 1. Liga average is 3.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Rīgas FS II's matches and 75% of JDFS Alberts's.
What form are Rīgas FS II and JDFS Alberts in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and JDFS Alberts 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rīgas FS II vs JDFS Alberts: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


