Rīgas FS vs Auda: match statistics
Rīgas FS vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rīgas FS played against Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Rīgas FS has 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Auda has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Rīgas FS scores 2.33 goals per game and allows 0.33. Auda scores 1.67 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Rīgas FS's games and 67% of Auda's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 67%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rīgas FS has the higher season xG average, 2.12 to 1.88 per game. Rīgas FS takes 16.7 shots per game, while Auda takes 16.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 1.67 goals per game after halftime. Auda leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rīgas FS's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For Auda, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rīgas FS is the favorite based on form: they have won 5 of their last 5 matches and scored 14 goals in those games, while Auda has 2 wins and 7 goals in the same period. At home Rīgas FS averages 3.0 goals per game with 19 shots and 9 on target, and has a conversion rate of 16%, translating to a home xG of 2.36 and conceding on average 0.5 goals. Auda on the road records 2.0 goals per game with 21 shots and 10 on target, has an away xG of 2.39 and formally 0.0 average goals conceded and 100% clean sheets, but in their last 5 away matches the visitors have conceded 6 goals. Rīgas FS earns 3.0 points per game in the last 5 matches versus Auda’s 1.4, and the superiority in possession (71% vs 61%) and better efficiency (16% vs 10%) favor the hosts. Taking this into account I tip a home win, although the high xG for both teams (2.36 vs 2.39) suggests the game could be open and several goals are likely.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators are contradictory — Rīgas FS has a seasonal BTTS 100%, while Auda has seasonal BTTS 0% and a seasonal 100% clean sheets — however recent form favors BTTS. In the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of games, and Rīgas FS scores on average 2.8 goals and concedes 1.0, while Auda averages 1.4 scored and 1.2 conceded, which suggests both sides have been both scoring and conceding recently. Auda’s offensive metrics are strong: season xG for Auda is 2.39 and they average 10.0 shots on target, versus the hosts with xG 1.63 and 4.5 shots on target, so Auda should create goal-scoring opportunities. Given the league’s overall BTTS rate of 60% and Rīgas FS being in form 'wwwww' with 14 goals in the last 5 (2.8 per game), the stronger signal is BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model forecasts a total of 3.17 goals (expected_goals_home = 1.15, expected_goals_away = 2.02), calculated as the average of attack xG and opponent defensive xG: Rīgas FS attack xG 1.63 versus Auda defensive xG 0.67 yields 1.15 for the home side, and Auda attack xG 2.39 versus Rīgas FS defensive xG 1.65 yields 2.02 for the away side. Auda averages 21.0 shots and 10.0 on target per match versus 13.5/4.5 for Rīgas FS, with conversion rates of 10% vs 11%, which increases the away side’s scoring potential and supports a total over 2.5. In the last 5 fixtures Rīgas FS scored an average of 2.8 goals (14 goals in 5 matches), Auda 1.4 goals (7 goals in 5), and both teams have 60% of those matches over 2.5, confirming a tendency toward higher-scoring games. Season-to-date both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, and the league average is 2.53 goals per match, providing a very strong signal for over 1.5 and additional support for over 2.5 given the expected total of 3.17. Based on this, I recommend playing over 1.5 as the strongest selection (95% in my view), rate over 2.5 at 75%, while over 3.5 is less likely (35%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Auda has a seasonal xG of 2.39 versus Rīgas FS’s 1.63, averaging 10.0 shots on target compared to 4.5 and 3.0 goals per match versus 1.5 for the hosts, indicating a clear advantage for the visitors. The visitors have led at the break in 100% of their matches and concede an average of 0.0 goals by halftime, while Rīgas FS concedes an average of 0.5 goals by halftime and led at the break in 50% of matches, so the HT market favors Auda. In the second half Auda scores on average 1.0 goal and win 100% of second halves, while the hosts concede on average 1.0 goal after the break, which increases the likelihood of the visitors maintaining or extending their lead. Although Rīgas FS are on a run of 5 wins in their last 5 matches, the xG, shots and the season goal averages of 2.0 for Auda versus 1.5 for the hosts argue for a visitors’ win; therefore my main pick is 2/2 (Half-Time/Full-Time: Away/Away).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS | Auda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rīgas FS is 50% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 2 pts / game - Auda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS is 40% better for: goals scored per game.
2.33 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1.67 goals / game - Auda
Rīgas FS is 203% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.33 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1 goals / game - Auda
Rīgas FS scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).
Auda scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rīgas FS
Over / Under - Auda
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 2.33 pts / game - Auda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Auda - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.67 | 2.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 100% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.33 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 0% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rīgas FS
Auda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS | Liga | Auda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.67 | 2.53 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 47% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 21% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 82% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Rīgas FS's perspective: 4 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Auda. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS vs Auda?
The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 0:1 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and Auda?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 4, Auda won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs Auda?
Rīgas FS score 2.33 goals per game on average and Auda 1.67. The Virsliga average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Rīgas FS's matches and 67% of Auda's.
What form are Rīgas FS and Auda in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 3-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Auda 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs Auda?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rīgas FS vs Auda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.