Rīgas FS vs Auda: match statistics
Rīgas FS vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Rīgas FS play Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 4 April 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Rīgas FS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Auda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Rīgas FS scores 2.39 and concedes 0.70 goals per match. Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Rīgas FS 43%, Auda 59%. Over 2.5: Rīgas FS 57%, Auda 55%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Rīgas FS has higher xG: 1.95 vs 1.63. Rīgas FS: 16.0 shots per match, Auda: 13.2.
Match halves
Rīgas FS: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.30. Auda: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
Rīgas FS: 76-90+ (12 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
6 H2H matches: 5-1-0. Average goals 1.83, BTTS 33%.
Match description
Rīgas FS is the favorite based on form: they have won 5 of their last 5 matches and scored 14 goals in those games, while Auda has 2 wins and 7 goals in the same period. At home Rīgas FS averages 3.0 goals per game with 19 shots and 9 on target, and has a conversion rate of 16%, translating to a home xG of 2.36 and conceding on average 0.5 goals. Auda on the road records 2.0 goals per game with 21 shots and 10 on target, has an away xG of 2.39 and formally 0.0 average goals conceded and 100% clean sheets, but in their last 5 away matches the visitors have conceded 6 goals. Rīgas FS earns 3.0 points per game in the last 5 matches versus Auda’s 1.4, and the superiority in possession (71% vs 61%) and better efficiency (16% vs 10%) favor the hosts. Taking this into account I tip a home win, although the high xG for both teams (2.36 vs 2.39) suggests the game could be open and several goals are likely.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS | Auda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Rīgas FS is 160% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Rīgas FS · 1 pts / match - Auda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
2.39 goals / match - Rīgas FS · 1.68 goals / match - Auda
Rīgas FS is 69% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.7 goals / match - Rīgas FS · 1.18 goals / match - Auda
Rīgas FS scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
Auda scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 52% (12 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Rīgas FS
Over / Under — Auda
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / match - Rīgas FS · 1.45 pts / match - Auda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 83%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Auda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Rīgas FS
Auda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS | Liga | Auda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.09 | 2.98 | ▼ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 55% | • 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 52% | 24% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 75% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 84% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Rīgas FS 5 - 1 - 0 Auda. Average goals 1.83, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS vs Auda?
The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 0:1 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and Auda?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 5, Auda won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs Auda?
Rīgas FS score 2.39 goals per game on average and Auda 1.68. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Rīgas FS's matches and 59% of Auda's.
What form are Rīgas FS and Auda in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Auda 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs Auda?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rīgas FS vs Auda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.