Latvia - VirsligaRTU stadionsData current as of September 06, 2026

Rīgas FS vs Ogre United: match statistics

Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS
6 : 0half-time 3:0
Ogre United crest
Ogre United

Rīgas FS vs Ogre United: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rīgas FS played against Ogre United in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on June 22, 2026. Venue: RTU stadions. Final score: 6:0.

Recent form

Rīgas FS has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Ogre United has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Rīgas FS scores 2.33 goals per game and allows 0.78. Ogre United scores 0.89 and allows 2.33. Games in this league average 2.97 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of Rīgas FS's games and 67% of Ogre United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 50%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rīgas FS has the higher season xG average, 1.99 to 1.03 per game. Rīgas FS takes 16.4 shots per game, while Ogre United takes 8.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 56% of its games and scores 1.22 goals per game after halftime. Ogre United leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.56 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rīgas FS's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). For Ogre United, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.97 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS holds a clear statistical advantage: as league leaders at home they have won 75% of matches, average 2.88 goals scored and concede only 0.75, while Ogre United sit 10th and on the road score 0.78 and concede 2.89. The home side generate 1.94 xG at home with 0.87 xG against, whereas the visitors have 1.1 xG away and 2.01 xG against, indicating higher quality of chance creation by Rīgas FS and greater defensive vulnerability from Ogre. Rīgas FS attempts 16.63 shots per match with 6 on target and 17% conversion on average possession of 62%, while Ogre average 9.11 shots with 3.11 on target and 9% conversion and 40% possession, so the hosts should dominate in chance creation. In the last 5 matches Rīgas FS have won 4, scored 13 goals and average 2.4 points per game in that period, whereas Ogre have 1 win, 5 goals scored, 0.8 points per game and have conceded 10 goals, confirming the visitors’ poorer form. Considering the edge in conversion (17% vs 9%), number of shots on target and clean sheets (50% for hosts vs 11% for visitors) and the goal difference (+17 for hosts vs -19 for visitors), I assess the probabilities as: home 78%, draw 12%, away 10%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend BTTS - Yes. Rīgas FS posts a seasonal BTTS rate of 78% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Ogre is at 56% seasonally and 60% in the last 5, giving a combined BTTS signal well above the league baseline of 59%. This season Rīgas FS scored 42 goals while Ogre conceded 42; simultaneously Ogre have only 16 goals scored and Rīgas FS have conceded 14, indicating the home side will attack against a very vulnerable defense. In the last 5 matches Rīgas have 13 goals (2.6 avg) and xG 1.88, and Ogre 5 goals (1.0 avg) and xG 1.1; defenses are also leaking — Rīgas concede 1.0 avg in L5 and Ogre 2.0. Clean sheets are rare (Rīgas 0% seasonal clean sheets, Ogre 11% vs league average 43%), and on-target shots per match are 1.89 (Rīgas) vs 3.11 (Ogre), which further reduces the chance of a no-goal outcome for one side; therefore I assess BTTS probability at 72% vs 28% and recommend “Yes.”

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project approximately 2.99 total goals in the match: Rīgas FS 1.79 and Ogre United 1.20. This is based on a weighted xG calculation — the hosts’ last 5 matches show attack xG 1.88 and opponent defensive xG conceded 2.12 (average 2.00), while season figures are 0.95 and 2.01 (average 1.48); consolidated yields 1.79 for Rīgas FS, with Ogre similarly around 1.20. Rīgas FS have averaged 2.6 goals scored in their last 5 games, and Ogre United concede on average 2.12 xG and 2.89 goals per game over the season, which increases the likelihood of a higher-scoring match. Additionally, matches over 1.5 goals account for 78% for the hosts and 100% for the visitors, and BTTS rates are 78% and 56%, so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Rīgas FS holds a clear form advantage: in their last 5 matches the hosts won 4 of 5 (80%) and led at the break in 3 of 5 (60%), scoring on average 1.2 goals in the first half versus 0.4 for Ogre United. Seasonal and recent first-half metrics confirm this: seasonally Rīgas score 0.44 goals by half-time vs 0.22 for Ogre, and in the last 5 matches the HT goals average is 1.2 vs 0.4. Over the full match the hosts have averaged 2.6 goals in the last 5 fixtures compared with 1.0 for the visitors, and the hosts’ shot conversion rate is 11% versus 9% for Ogre, which increases the chance of maintaining a lead. Although season xG is 0.95 for Rīgas and 1.10 for Ogre (the visitors have slightly higher xG), the low percentage of matches in which both teams scored by half-time for the hosts (22%), combined with a high percentage of matches where both teams scored by full-time (78%), suggests the hosts will have the lead at the break and an open second half. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is 1/1 (home leading at half-time and winning Full-Time), which carries the highest probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

66Possession (%)34
Rīgas FSOgre United
23Shots4
Rīgas FSOgre United
13Shots on target1
Rīgas FSOgre United
2.95xG0.54
Rīgas FSOgre United
8Corners3
Rīgas FSOgre United
84Dangerous attacks28
Rīgas FSOgre United
16Fouls18
Rīgas FSOgre United
0Cards4
Rīgas FSOgre United

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Rīgas FSOgre United
2.33Goals scored / game0.89
Rīgas FSOgre United
0.78Goals allowed / game2.33
Rīgas FSOgre United
62%Average possession42%
Rīgas FSOgre United
6.22Shots on target / game2.5
Rīgas FSOgre United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.44Shots per game8.94
Rīgas FSOgre United
6.22Shots on target2.5
Rīgas FSOgre United
14.2%Shot conversion9.9%
Rīgas FSOgre United
62%Possession42%
Rīgas FSOgre United
1.99xG for1.03
Rīgas FSOgre United
0.83xG against2
Rīgas FSOgre United

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS: DominantOgre United: Balanced
Rīgas FSOgre United
Accuracy (shots on target)38%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rīgas FS is 200% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 0.8 pts / game - Ogre United

Rīgas FS
WWWWL
Season result split
83% W6% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-1-2
2.56 pts / game · goal difference +28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-1
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Ogre United
LDLLW
Season result split
6% W22% R72% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-13
0.39 pts / game · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-8
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 2.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 162% better for: goals scored per game.

2.33 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 0.89 goals / game - Ogre United

Rīgas FS is 199% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.78 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 2.33 goals / game - Ogre United

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 94% of games (17 of 18 meczów), while Ogre United keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 18 meczów).

Ogre United scoring profile: mixed

Ogre United scores in 72% of games (13 of 18 meczów), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 meczów).

42Goals scored (season)16
Rīgas FSOgre United
14Goals conceded (season)42
Rīgas FSOgre United
3.11Average goals per game3.22
Rīgas FSOgre United
13Goals scored (last 5)5
Rīgas FSOgre United
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
Rīgas FSOgre United

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal72%
Rīgas FSOgre United
67%2 goals11%
Rīgas FSOgre United
44%3 goals6%
Rīgas FSOgre United
22%4 goals0%
Rīgas FSOgre United

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal94%
Rīgas FSOgre United
17%2 goals61%
Rīgas FSOgre United
11%3 goals39%
Rīgas FSOgre United
0%4 goals28%
Rīgas FSOgre United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time17%
Rīgas FSOgre United
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Rīgas FSOgre United
56%Scored in both halves6%
Rīgas FSOgre United

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Rīgas FSOgre United
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Rīgas FSOgre United
80%BTTS - last 560%
Rīgas FSOgre United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Rīgas FSOgre United
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Rīgas FSOgre United
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Rīgas FSOgre United

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Rīgas FSOgre United
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Rīgas FSOgre United
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Rīgas FSOgre United

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 218% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.94 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 0.61 pts / game - Ogre United

Rīgas FS - half-time state
56% leading28% draw17% trailing
Ogre United - half-time state
11% leading28% draw61% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.94Points per game (1st half)0.61
Rīgas FSOgre United
1.11Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Rīgas FSOgre United
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1.17
Rīgas FSOgre United
1.61Average goals (1st half)1.5
Rīgas FSOgre United
67%Clean sheet before half-time28%
Rīgas FSOgre United
28%No goal before half-time78%
Rīgas FSOgre United

After half-time (2nd half)

2.06Points per game (2nd half)1
Rīgas FSOgre United
1.22Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Rīgas FSOgre United
0.28Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
Rīgas FSOgre United
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.72
Rīgas FSOgre United
78%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Rīgas FSOgre United
22%No goal after half-time44%
Rīgas FSOgre United

Rīgas FS - second-half results

56% W39% R6% P
35
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 83%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ogre United - second-half results

28% W17% R56% P
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding55%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 6%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Rīgas FS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.20
Goals scored / game1.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.81.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Ogre United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game1.20.8
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
9
2
16-30
6
5
31-45
7
2
46-60
8
1
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Ogre United
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
3
6
16-30
2
11
31-45
5
6
46-60
2
5
61-75
3
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.17
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
68%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Ogre United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.97
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FSLigaOgre United
Average goals per game 3.112.97 3.22
Both teams scored 44%59% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%54% 50%
Clean sheets 50%22% 6%
Goal before half-time 83%77% 78%
Goal after half-time 78%85% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / game
1.33
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ogre UnitedSubstitutionOn: Roberts AdītājsOff: Markuss Ivulāns
  2. Ogre UnitedYellow cardMarkuss Kalnins
  3. Ogre UnitedSubstitutionOn: Kaito KumakuraOff: Davis Sedols
  4. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Roberts SavaļnieksOff: Aleksandar Filipović
  5. Ogre UnitedYellow cardKoki Hayashi
  6. Ogre UnitedYellow cardHaralds Silagailis
  7. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Ismael DiomandéOff: Mārtiņš Ķigurs
  8. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Alain Cedric Herve KouadioOff: Darko Lemajić
  9. Ogre UnitedSubstitutionOn: Emīls SpruktsOff: Emīls Evelons
  10. Ogre UnitedYellow cardTymofiy Marusiy
  11. Rīgas FSGoalIsmael DiomandéAssist: Mor Talla Gaye
  12. Rīgas FSGoalIsmael Diomandé

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rīgas FS's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ogre United. Games average 4.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS vs Ogre United?

The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 6:0 Ogre United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and Ogre United?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 2, Ogre United won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs Ogre United?

Rīgas FS score 2.33 goals per game on average and Ogre United 0.89. The Virsliga average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Rīgas FS's matches and 67% of Ogre United's.

What form are Rīgas FS and Ogre United in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Ogre United 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs Ogre United?

The statistical background for Rīgas FS vs Ogre United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.