Rīgas FS vs Super Nova: match statistics
Rīgas FS vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rīgas FS played against Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on October 15, 2026. Venue: RTU stadions. Final score: 4:0.
Recent form
Rīgas FS has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Super Nova has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Rīgas FS scores 2.42 goals per game and allows 0.77. Super Nova scores 1.00 and allows 1.32. Games in this league average 2.87 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Rīgas FS's games and 55% of Super Nova's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 48%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rīgas FS has the higher season xG average, 1.98 to 1.25 per game. Rīgas FS takes 16.4 shots per game, while Super Nova takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 52% of its games and scores 1.39 goals per game after halftime. Super Nova leads at halftime in 16% and scores 0.52 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rīgas FS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). For Super Nova, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Virsliga games average 2.87 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 6 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rīgas FS is the clear favorite in this fixture: at home they average 3.00 goals per game (56 goals this season) and register a higher xG — 1.88 versus Super Nova’s 1.20, indicating superior chance quality. The hosts average 15.64 shots per game with 5.82 on target, while the visitors manage only 8.92 shots and 3.5 on target; shot conversion is 19% vs 11%, so Rīgas converts chances more frequently. Defensively Rīgas concedes 0.73 goals per home game and have allowed just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, whereas Super Nova concedes 1.08 on the road and have shipped 9 goals in their last five fixtures, highlighting defensive issues for the visitors. Additionally, the hosts have won all of their last 5 matches (10 goals scored) compared to the visitors’ record of 3 wins and 2 losses (8 goals), and the percentage of matches without a goal is 9% for Rīgas and 33% for Super Nova, which increases the probability of a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Signals are mixed: seasonally Rīgas FS has BTTS at 82% and Super Nova 42%, with the league average at 55%, which on the season favors BTTS. However, in the last 5 matches the picture is reversed — the home side has BTTS only 20% while the visitors 80%; Rīgas FS in this period scored 10 and conceded 1 (avg 2.0 scored and 0.2 conceded) with recent xG 2.36 vs xG against 0.88. Super Nova in their last five games scored 8 and conceded 9 (1.6-1.8) with recent xG_for 1.63 and xG_against 1.69, meaning they can create chances but are defensively vulnerable. Considering that the hosts’ recent form is 5 wins with a 10-1 record and a significant suppression of the opponent’s chances (xG against 0.88 vs 1.63 xG created by the visitors), the stronger and more recent signal appears to be No BTTS; I propose 65% for "no" and 35% for "yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Rīgas FS in the last 5 matches scores on average 2.0 goals and concedes 0.2, with xG 2.36 in attack and 0.88 in defense; Super Nova in the last 5 averages 1.6 scored and 1.8 conceded, with xG 1.63 (attack) and 1.69 (defense). Combining one team’s attack with the other’s defense ((2.36+1.69)/2 and (1.63+0.88)/2) yields a projection of about 2.03 goals for Rīgas FS and 1.25 for Super Nova, totalling ~3.28 goals. Seasonal stats confirm a tendency for goals: Rīgas FS has 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, home teams have 64% of matches over 2.5, and the league averages 2.95 goals per match. Given these figures, Over 1.5 is the strongest signal (high confidence), Over 2.5 has a moderate edge given the expected 3.28 goals, while Over 3.5 is less justified (seasonally 27% for hosts and 0% for visitors). Therefore I recommend betting on Over 1.5 as the best line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and an away win at full-time (X/2). Both teams have similar xG: hosts 1.17 vs visitors 1.20, however the hosts concede on average 1.89 goals per match compared to 1.48 for the visitors, giving the away side a defensive advantage. Season-long metrics show the visitors have won 50% of matches and accumulate 1.58 points per game, while the hosts have only an 18% win rate and 0.73 points per game, so I expect Super Nova to take the initiative after the break. A draw at the break is also the most common half-time outcome — hosts were level at the interval in 45% of matches and the visitors in 58% — and the average first-half goals are low: 0.64 (home) vs 0.5 (away), which favors a low-scoring first half. Although the hosts led at half-time in 100% of their last five matches, the visitors’ superior efficiency and better defense (seasonal goals conceded: 2.0 hosts vs 1.08 visitors) lead me to forecast an X/2 HT/FT.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rīgas FS | Super Nova | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rīgas FS is 22% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 1.8 pts / game - Super Nova
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS is 142% better for: goals scored per game.
2.42 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1 goals / game - Super Nova
Rīgas FS is 71% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.77 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1.32 goals / game - Super Nova
Rīgas FS scores in 94% of games (29 of 31 games), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 games).
Super Nova scores in 74% of games (23 of 31 games), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 48% (15 of 31 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rīgas FS
Over / Under - Super Nova
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rīgas FS is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.84 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 1.03 pts / game - Super Nova
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rīgas FS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 77%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Super Nova - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rīgas FS
Super Nova
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Rīgas FS | Liga | Super Nova | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.19 | 2.87 | ▼ 2.32 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 55% | • 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 58% | 53% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 48% | 25% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 74% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 81% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Rīgas FS's perspective: 6 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Super Nova. Games average 3.33 goals, and both teams scored in 83% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?
The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 4:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and Super Nova?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 6, Super Nova won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?
Rīgas FS score 2.42 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.00. The Virsliga average is 2.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Rīgas FS's matches and 55% of Super Nova's.
What form are Rīgas FS and Super Nova in?
Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Super Nova 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs Super Nova?
The statistical background for Rīgas FS vs Super Nova — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


