Latvia - VirsligaRTU stadionsData current as of September 06, 2026

Rīgas FS vs Tukums: match statistics

Rīgas FS crest
Rīgas FS
3 : 1half-time 2:0
Tukums crest
Tukums

Rīgas FS vs Tukums: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Rīgas FS played against Tukums in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on May 25, 2026. Venue: RTU stadions. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Rīgas FS has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Tukums has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Rīgas FS scores 2.36 goals per game and allows 0.64. Tukums scores 2.00 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 3.10 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 29% of Rīgas FS's games and 93% of Tukums's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 71%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Rīgas FS has the higher season xG average, 2.09 to 1.39 per game. Rīgas FS takes 17.7 shots per game, while Tukums takes 11.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Rīgas FS leads at halftime in 57% of its games and scores 1.29 goals per game after halftime. Tukums leads at halftime in 29% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Rīgas FS's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Tukums, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 3.10 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 5 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Rīgas FS approaches the match as league leaders with a record of 12 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss this season; they have won all 5 of their last 5 matches, scoring 17 goals (3.4 per game). At home the hosts average 2.86 goals, 17.14 shots and 6.29 on target, with an xG of 2.00 and only 0.71 goals conceded, indicating both high-quality chance creation and a solid defense. Tukums have no away wins yet (0% wins), recording 67% draws and 33% losses, concede 2.00 goals on average and have a lower xG (1.39) than xG against (1.64), pointing to greater defensive issues. The visitors have nonetheless scored 16 goals in their last 5 matches overall (3.2 average), but away they produce only 11.33 shots and 4.33 on target with 46% possession versus 61% and 6.29 on target for the hosts, so the advantage should remain with the home side. Considering the higher xG (2.00 vs 1.39), better efficiency and 57% clean sheets at home versus 0% for the visitors, the highest probability favors a Rīgas FS victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The analysis favors the 'Both Teams To Score' scenario. Seasonal BTTS rates are 88% for Rīgas FS and 100% for Tukums, versus a league average of 60%. Rīgas FS have scored 33 and conceded 9 this season (avg 2.25 GF, 1.5 GA), while Tukums have 28 GF and 24 GA (1.67 GF, 2.0 GA), indicating both sides regularly find the net. Both teams' xG are 1.39 each, xG against are 1.53 vs 1.64, and shots on target are 5.13 vs 4.33 with conversion rates of 20% vs 15%, reflecting genuine offensive potential from both teams. Contrary signals: Rīgas have only 20% BTTS in their last 5 matches and concede 0.6 GA on average in that period, but Tukums have 80% BTTS in their last 5 and 0% clean sheets this season, which strongly supports a Goal/Goal outcome. Considering dominant seasonal profiles (88% and 100% BTTS, 0% CS for Tukums) alongside xG and shot stats, I tip BTTS - Yes with an 85% probability versus 15% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Rīgas FS scores on average 2.25 goals per match this season, while Tukums averages 1.67; in the last 5 matches the hosts averaged 3.4 goals and the visitors 3.2, indicating clear offensive form from both sides. xG analysis over the last 5 matches: Rīgas FS attacking xG = 2.38 and Tukums defensive xG = 1.43 yield a projected home xG ≈1.91; likewise Tukums attacking xG = 1.77 and Rīgas FS defensive xG = 0.99 give an away xG ≈1.38, totaling ≈3.29 expected goals. Season metrics confirm a high-scoring profile: over 1.5 has occurred in 100% of matches for both teams, over 2.5 in 75% of Rīgas FS games and 67% of Tukums games, while BTTS stands at 88% (hosts) and 100% (away). Considering the season rates (75%/67% for over 2.5) and the last 5 matches (over 2.5 in 80% for both), I estimate over 2.5 at about 76%, but the strongest and most reliable signal is over 1.5 (seasonally 100%/100%). Over 3.5 is less certain: seasonally 50% for the hosts and 33% for the visitors (average ≈42%); accounting for form I assign over 3.5 roughly 45%, therefore I primarily recommend over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Rīgas FS has a clear advantage in form and first halves: they won 100% of their last 5 matches and held a lead at the break in 80% of them; over the season they led at half-time in 38% of matches, averaging 1.0 goals by the break (last 5: 1.8). Tukums led at the break in only 17% of the season’s matches and shows 0% wins and 67% draws in the available statistics, suggesting the visitors are prone to share points rather than secure wins. Rīgas average 2.25 goals per match versus Tukums’s 1.67, with identical average xG of 1.39 for both teams, but Rīgas demonstrate higher finishing efficiency (20% vs 15%) and a better average of shots on target (5.13 vs 4.33), which increases the likelihood of maintaining and extending a lead. Consequently the most probable scenario is a Rīgas lead at half-time and a Rīgas full-time victory (1/1), assigned the highest probability of 34%, whereas half-time draw/full-time draw (X/X) at 10% or an away win (2/2) at 5% are assessed as considerably less likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
Rīgas FSTukums
13Shots7
Rīgas FSTukums
4Shots on target4
Rīgas FSTukums
1.55xG0.93
Rīgas FSTukums
12Corners0
Rīgas FSTukums
62Dangerous attacks28
Rīgas FSTukums
11Fouls6
Rīgas FSTukums
3Cards1
Rīgas FSTukums

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.36Goals scored / game2
Rīgas FSTukums
0.64Goals allowed / game1.71
Rīgas FSTukums
62%Average possession44%
Rīgas FSTukums
6.43Shots on target / game4.79
Rīgas FSTukums

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

17.71Shots per game11.14
Rīgas FSTukums
6.43Shots on target4.79
Rīgas FSTukums
13.3%Shot conversion17.9%
Rīgas FSTukums
62%Possession44%
Rīgas FSTukums
2.09xG for1.39
Rīgas FSTukums
0.81xG against1.58
Rīgas FSTukums

Shooting quality

Rīgas FS: DominantTukums: Counter-attacking
Rīgas FSTukums
Accuracy (shots on target)36%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Rīgas FS is 88% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 1.6 pts / game - Tukums

Rīgas FS
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
86% W7% R7% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-1-1
2.64 pts / game · goal difference +24
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.37Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 80%
Tukums
WWDDL
Season result split
14% W50% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-7-5
0.93 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-2
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DDLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Rīgas FS is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

2.36 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 2 goals / game - Tukums

Rīgas FS is 167% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.64 goals / game - Rīgas FS · 1.71 goals / game - Tukums

Rīgas FS scoring profile: very strong

Rīgas FS scores in 93% of games (13 of 14 meczów), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 meczów).

Tukums scoring profile: strong

Tukums scores in 100% of games (14 of 14 meczów), while Rīgas FS keeps a clean sheet in 64% (9 of 14 meczów).

33Goals scored (season)28
Rīgas FSTukums
9Goals conceded (season)24
Rīgas FSTukums
3Average goals per game3.71
Rīgas FSTukums
17Goals scored (last 5)16
Rīgas FSTukums
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
Rīgas FSTukums

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal100%
Rīgas FSTukums
64%2 goals36%
Rīgas FSTukums
43%3 goals29%
Rīgas FSTukums
29%4 goals14%
Rīgas FSTukums

How often they concede at least...

36%1 goal93%
Rīgas FSTukums
14%2 goals57%
Rīgas FSTukums
14%3 goals21%
Rīgas FSTukums
0%4 goals0%
Rīgas FSTukums

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time43%
Rīgas FSTukums
7%BTTS in both halves14%
Rīgas FSTukums
50%Scored in both halves36%
Rīgas FSTukums

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Rīgas FSTukums
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Rīgas FSTukums
20%BTTS - last 580%
Rīgas FSTukums

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time93%
Rīgas FSTukums
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
Rīgas FSTukums
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time36%
Rīgas FSTukums

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Rīgas FSTukums
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Rīgas FSTukums
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Rīgas FSTukums

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Rīgas FS is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - Rīgas FS · 1.14 pts / game - Tukums

Rīgas FS - half-time state
57% leading29% draw14% trailing
Tukums - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)1.14
Rīgas FSTukums
1.07Goals scored (1st half)1
Rīgas FSTukums
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)1
Rīgas FSTukums
1.5Average goals (1st half)2
Rīgas FSTukums
71%Clean sheet before half-time36%
Rīgas FSTukums
29%No goal before half-time29%
Rīgas FSTukums

After half-time (2nd half)

2.07Points per game (2nd half)1.43
Rīgas FSTukums
1.29Goals scored (2nd half)1
Rīgas FSTukums
0.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Rīgas FSTukums
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.71
Rīgas FSTukums
86%Clean sheet after half-time36%
Rīgas FSTukums
29%No goal after half-time36%
Rīgas FSTukums

Rīgas FS - second-half results

57% W36% R7% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+15
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 86%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tukums - second-half results

36% W36% R29% P
16
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Rīgas FS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.402.60
Goals scored / game1.81.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game2.41.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+6+8
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 9
Tukums - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.00
Goals scored / game1.61.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game2.62.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Rīgas FS
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
6
1
16-30
5
4
31-45
7
1
46-60
6
1
61-75
5
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
8
16-30
8
3
31-45
3
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.36
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+55%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
93%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Rīgas FS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Rīgas FSLigaTukums
Average goals per game 3.003.10 3.71
Both teams scored 29%60% 93%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%57% 71%
Clean sheets 64%21% 7%
Goal before half-time 79%78% 93%
Goal after half-time 71%85% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.10
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Rīgas FSAssistLasha OdishariaGoal: Ivans Baturins
  2. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Mor Talla GayeOff: Lasha Odisharia
  3. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Renē BaumanisOff: Raivis Ķiršs
  4. TukumsYellow cardRenē Baumanis
  5. Rīgas FSYellow cardMārtiņš Ķigurs
  6. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Dāvis Mārcis ValmiersOff: Rūdolfs Meļķis
  7. Rīgas FSYellow cardAlain Cedric Herve Kouadio
  8. Rīgas FSSubstitutionOn: Niks DusalijevsOff: Mārtiņš Ķigurs
  9. Rīgas FSYellow cardMor Talla Gaye
  10. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Kristaps KļaviņšOff: Bogdans Samoilovs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Rīgas FS's perspective: 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Tukums. Games average 5.20 goals, and both teams scored in 80% of them.

Tukums
1 : 2
Rīgas FS
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 4
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
6 : 2
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 5
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
FK Rīgas Futbola skola
2 : 0
FK Tukums 2000

FAQ

What was the result of Rīgas FS vs Tukums?

The Virsliga match finished Rīgas FS 3:1 Tukums. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Rīgas FS and Tukums?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Rīgas FS won 5, Tukums won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Rīgas FS vs Tukums?

Rīgas FS score 2.36 goals per game on average and Tukums 2.00. The Virsliga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Rīgas FS's matches and 93% of Tukums's.

What form are Rīgas FS and Tukums in?

Over the last 5 games Rīgas FS have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Tukums 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rīgas FS vs Tukums?

The statistical background for Rīgas FS vs Tukums — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.