Rosenborg vs Lillestrøm: match statistics
Rosenborg vs Lillestrøm: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rosenborg played against Lillestrøm in Eliteserien (Norway). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Rosenborg has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Lillestrøm has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Rosenborg scores 0.43 goals per game and allows 1.57. Lillestrøm scores 1.86 and allows 0.57. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Rosenborg's games and 29% of Lillestrøm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 43%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lillestrøm has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.19 per game. Rosenborg takes 10.4 shots per game, while Lillestrøm takes 13.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Rosenborg leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.14 goals per game after halftime. Lillestrøm leads at halftime in 29% and scores 1.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rosenborg's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Lillestrøm, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eliteserien games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lillestrøm appears the clear favorite: they sit 3rd in the table versus Rosenborg’s 14th, and away they have a 5-1-1 record (5 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss; 75% win rate). In attack the visitors also have the edge — Lillestrøm average 14.75 shots and 5.75 on target away, scoring 1.5 goals with xG 1.64, while Rosenborg at home record 11.67 shots and 3 on target, scoring 1.0 goals with xG 1.31. The visitors’ defense is decisive: Lillestrøm concede only 0.25 goals per away match on average and keep 75% clean sheets, whereas Rosenborg at home concede 1.33 goals and have 0% clean sheets; the hosts have conceded 11 goals at home versus 4 goals conceded by the away side in the cited stats. Form corroborates Lillestrøm’s superiority — Rosenborg in the last 5 matches are 1-2-2, scoring 3 and conceding 7 (1 point per match on average), while Lillestrøm are 3-1-1, scoring 9 and conceding 3 (2 points per match on average). Considering the advantage in chance creation (more shots and higher xG) and a markedly better away defense, I predict a Lillestrøm win (65%); draw 20%, Rosenborg win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project No BTTS with a 70% probability, primarily based on Lillestrøm's defensive metrics: a season clean sheet rate of 75% with an average of 0.25 goals conceded per game. Rosenborg shows stronger season offensive numbers (2.33 goals per game and 21% shot conversion), but in the last 5 matches the home side is scoring only 0.6 and conceding 1.4, which weakens their ability to break down a solid opponent defense. xG comparison indicates moderate expected goals (xG 1.32 for Rosenborg and 1.64 for Lillestrøm), yet Lillestrøm concedes only 0.25 goals despite an xG against of 1.66, suggesting effective defensive organization. Additionally, seasonal BTTS rates are low: Rosenborg 33% and Lillestrøm 25% versus a league level of 50%, and BTTS rates in the last 5 matches are 40% and 20%, respectively, which together support a No Goal/clean sheet expected scenario. Therefore I assign a 30% chance to BTTS - Yes and 70% to BTTS - No, selecting BTTS - No as the most likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG analysis using the average method (home team’s attacking xG and opponent’s xG conceded) yields an expected 1.49 goals for Rosenborg (1.32 and 1.66 combine to 1.49) and 1.44 goals for Lillestrøm (1.64 and 1.24 combine to 1.44), total = 2.93. Seasonal figures confirm offensive potential: Rosenborg scores 2.33 goals at home and has 67% of home matches Over 2.5 goals, while Lillestrøm scores 1.50 goals away. A counterpoint is Lillestrøm’s high clean sheet rate — 75% of season matches — and low both-teams-to-score rates (33% Rosenborg, 25% Lillestrøm). Nevertheless, the combined expected total of 2.93 (>2.5) and Rosenborg’s 100% of home matches Over 1.5 indicate the strongest signal is Over 2.5, so I recommend the Over side at the 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/2: Rosenborg leads at half-time, and Lillestrøm wins at full-time. Rosenborg led at the break in 67% of matches and averages 1.33 goals by half-time versus Lillestrøm’s 0.25, increasing the hosts’ chance of a lead after 45 minutes. At the same time Lillestrøm have a higher xG (1.64 vs 1.32), average 2.5 points per game this season versus Rosenborg’s 2.0, and have a 60% win rate in their last five matches compared to the hosts’ 20%, all of which support a comeback. The visitors score an average of 1.25 goals in the second half and win second halves in 75% of cases, while Rosenborg concede 0.67 goals after the break, so I expect a turnaround after half-time. For these reasons I give the highest probability to the 1/2 scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rosenborg | Lillestrøm | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.14 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Lillestrøm is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Rosenborg · 2 pts / game - Lillestrøm
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lillestrøm is 333% better for: goals scored per game.
0.43 goals / game - Rosenborg · 1.86 goals / game - Lillestrøm
Lillestrøm is 175% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.57 goals / game - Rosenborg · 0.57 goals / game - Lillestrøm
Rosenborg scores in 29% of games (2 of 7 meczów), while Lillestrøm keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 meczów).
Lillestrøm scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 meczów), while Rosenborg keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rosenborg
Over / Under - Lillestrøm
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lillestrøm is 151% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.57 pts / game - Rosenborg · 1.43 pts / game - Lillestrøm
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rosenborg - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Lillestrøm - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rosenborg
Lillestrøm
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| Rosenborg | Liga | Lillestrøm | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.83 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 51% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 51% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 26% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 78% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Rosenborg's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Lillestrøm. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rosenborg vs Lillestrøm?
The Eliteserien match finished Rosenborg 2:0 Lillestrøm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rosenborg and Lillestrøm?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rosenborg won 1, Lillestrøm won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rosenborg vs Lillestrøm?
Rosenborg score 0.43 goals per game on average and Lillestrøm 1.86. The Eliteserien average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Rosenborg's matches and 29% of Lillestrøm's.
What form are Rosenborg and Lillestrøm in?
Over the last 5 games Rosenborg have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Lillestrøm 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rosenborg vs Lillestrøm?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


