Royal Antwerp FC vs KRC Genk: match statistics
Royal Antwerp FC vs KRC Genk: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Royal Antwerp FC played against KRC Genk in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Venue: Bosuilstadion. Final score: 4:4.
Recent form
Royal Antwerp FC has 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. KRC Genk has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 1.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Royal Antwerp FC scores 2.50 goals per game and allows 0.50. KRC Genk scores 2.00 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.14 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Royal Antwerp FC's games and 100% of KRC Genk's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Royal Antwerp FC has the higher season xG average, 2.09 to 1.86 per game. Royal Antwerp FC takes 17.5 shots per game, while KRC Genk takes 16.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Royal Antwerp FC leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 2.00 goals per game after halftime. KRC Genk leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Royal Antwerp FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For KRC Genk, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Pro League games average 3.14 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Royal Antwerp are unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws, while Genk have lost 2 of their last 5 games and averaged only 1.4 points per match over that span. The hosts have won 100% of their home fixtures so far, scoring an average of 2 goals and creating chances worth 2.14 xG—clearly more than Genk’s 1.32 xG away from home. Antwerp also average 19 shots, including 7 on target, whereas Genk manage 11 attempts and 4 shots on target away from home. The visitors’ defense remains a concern, conceding an average of 2 goals per away match, while Genk have conceded as many as 12 goals in their last five outings. Genk could pose a threat with an average possession rate of 62%, but Antwerp’s advantage in chance quality, home effectiveness and current stability points to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is clear, as the seasonal data shows both teams have recorded both sides scoring in 100% of their matches, and neither has kept a clean sheet. Antwerp has very strong attacking potential at home: they average 3.0 goals, generate 2.39 xG and record 7 shots on target per match. Genk have scored an average of 1.8 goals in their last five appearances, with an xG of 1.44, while Antwerp, despite conceding just 0.4 goals per match over this period, allow opponents as much as 1.89 xG. The visitors are also defensively vulnerable, conceding an average of 2.4 goals in their last five matches, so the high probability of a home goal further strengthens the scenario of goals at both ends. The only risk to the pick is Antwerp's 40% BTTS rate in their last five matches, but Genk's 80% rate and the attacking numbers of both teams support the
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Antwerp create a high volume of chances at home: averaging 2.39 xG, 22 shots and 7 shots on target per match, while Genk concede an average of 1.33 xG. The visitors have conceded 12 goals in their last five matches, or 2.4 per game, which clearly strengthens the forecast of at least two goals for the hosts or an open game. In the available league data, both teams have scored and conceded in every match, while the league-wide average stands at a high 3.22 goals. Antwerp’s recent defensive form is better, however, as they have conceded only 2 goals in five matches, so the Over 2.5 goals line has a moderate rather than decisive edge. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected 2.87 goals and the hosts’ attacking profile significantly reduce the likelihood of a match with no more than one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Royal Antwerp win at the final whistle. In their last five matches, Antwerp conceded just 0.4 goals per game before the break, but also scored only 0.4, which strongly supports a level score after 45 minutes. Genk averaged 1.0 first-half goals during this period, but conceded as many as 1.4 goals per game after the break. Antwerp are unbeaten in their last five outings, averaging 2.2 points per game, and won 80% of second halves while keeping a clean sheet in 100% of them. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG stands at 2.39 compared with Genk’s 1.32, while the number of shots on target is 7 to 4.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Royal Antwerp FC | KRC Genk | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Royal Antwerp FC is 100% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Royal Antwerp FC · 1.5 pts / game - KRC Genk
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Royal Antwerp FC is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
2.5 goals / game - Royal Antwerp FC · 2 goals / game - KRC Genk
Royal Antwerp FC is 300% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Royal Antwerp FC · 2 goals / game - KRC Genk
Royal Antwerp FC scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while KRC Genk keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
KRC Genk scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 meczów), while Royal Antwerp FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Royal Antwerp FC
Over / Under - KRC Genk
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KRC Genk is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Royal Antwerp FC · 2 pts / game - KRC Genk
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Royal Antwerp FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
KRC Genk - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.50 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 100% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 0% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Royal Antwerp FC
KRC Genk
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Royal Antwerp FC | Liga | KRC Genk | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.14 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 67% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 26% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Royal Antwerp FC's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss against KRC Genk. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Royal Antwerp FC vs KRC Genk?
The Pro League match finished Royal Antwerp FC 4:4 KRC Genk. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Royal Antwerp FC and KRC Genk?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Royal Antwerp FC won 1, KRC Genk won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Royal Antwerp FC vs KRC Genk?
Royal Antwerp FC score 2.50 goals per game on average and KRC Genk 2.00. The Pro League average is 3.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Royal Antwerp FC's matches and 100% of KRC Genk's.
What form are Royal Antwerp FC and KRC Genk in?
Over the last 5 games Royal Antwerp FC have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and KRC Genk 1-0-1 (1.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Royal Antwerp FC vs KRC Genk?
The statistical background for Royal Antwerp FC vs KRC Genk — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


