Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo: match statistics
Royal Antwerp FC holds a clear advantage as the home side with a 42% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference of +4. The hosts demonstrate better offensive efficiency at home (1.58 goals per match) and a more solid defense (1.25 conceded per match) compared to the visitors' away defense (2.0 conceded per match). KVC Westerlo has very poor away form with just a 17% win rate and a negative goal difference of -8, making them vulnerable to defeats. The last five matches of both teams confirm the visitors' weaker form (0.8 points per match) compared to the hosts (1.2 points per match). xG statistics also indicate Antwerp's superiority, who should capitalize on their home advantage and secure the three points.
Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Royal Antwerp FC played against KVC Westerlo in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on February 15, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Royal Antwerp FC has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. KVC Westerlo has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Royal Antwerp FC scores 1.17 goals per game and allows 1.08. KVC Westerlo scores 1.25 and allows 1.54. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 46% of Royal Antwerp FC's games and 38% of KVC Westerlo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 38%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KVC Westerlo has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.37 per game. Royal Antwerp FC takes 11.9 shots per game, while KVC Westerlo takes 14.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Royal Antwerp FC leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. KVC Westerlo leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Royal Antwerp FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For KVC Westerlo, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Pro League games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Royal Antwerp FC holds a clear advantage as the home side with a 42% win rate in home matches and a positive goal difference of +4. The hosts demonstrate better offensive efficiency at home (1.58 goals per match) and a more solid defense (1.25 conceded per match) compared to the visitors' away defense (2.0 conceded per match). KVC Westerlo has very poor away form with just a 17% win rate and a negative goal difference of -8, making them vulnerable to defeats. The last five matches of both teams confirm the visitors' weaker form (0.8 points per match) compared to the hosts (1.2 points per match). xG statistics also indicate Antwerp's superiority, who should capitalize on their home advantage and secure the three points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Royal Antwerp FC | KVC Westerlo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Royal Antwerp FC is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Royal Antwerp FC · 0.8 pts / game - KVC Westerlo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KVC Westerlo is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
1.17 goals / game - Royal Antwerp FC · 1.25 goals / game - KVC Westerlo
Royal Antwerp FC is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.08 goals / game - Royal Antwerp FC · 1.54 goals / game - KVC Westerlo
Royal Antwerp FC scores in 63% of games (15 of 24 meczów), while KVC Westerlo keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 meczów).
KVC Westerlo scores in 58% of games (14 of 24 meczów), while Royal Antwerp FC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Royal Antwerp FC
Over / Under - KVC Westerlo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KVC Westerlo is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - Royal Antwerp FC · 1.42 pts / game - KVC Westerlo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Royal Antwerp FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
KVC Westerlo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 29%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Royal Antwerp FC
KVC Westerlo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Royal Antwerp FC | Liga | KVC Westerlo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.25 | 2.59 | ▲ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 54% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 45% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Royal Antwerp FC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against KVC Westerlo. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo?
The Pro League match finished Royal Antwerp FC 0:2 KVC Westerlo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo?
Royal Antwerp FC score 1.17 goals per game on average and KVC Westerlo 1.25. The Pro League average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Royal Antwerp FC's matches and 38% of KVC Westerlo's.
What form are Royal Antwerp FC and KVC Westerlo in?
Over the last 5 games Royal Antwerp FC have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and KVC Westerlo 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo?
The statistical background for Royal Antwerp FC vs KVC Westerlo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.