Rudar vs Dravinja: match statistics
Rudar vs Dravinja: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rudar played against Dravinja in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on September 28, 2026. Venue: Štadion Ob Jezeru. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Rudar has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Dravinja has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Rudar scores 2.14 goals per game and allows 1.71. Dravinja scores 1.00 and allows 2.43. Games in this league average 2.90 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Rudar's games and 71% of Dravinja's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 57%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rudar has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.52 per game. Rudar takes 13.7 shots per game, while Dravinja takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Rudar leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.71 goals per game after halftime. Dravinja leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.57 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rudar's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Dravinja, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. SNL games average 2.90 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rudar are significantly stronger at home: they have won all 3 home matches, scoring an average of 3.00 goals and conceding just 0.33. Dravinja have failed to win any of their 4 away fixtures, losing 75% of them and conceding an average of 2.25 goals. The hosts create more chances, averaging 16.33 shots compared with the visitors’ 10.50, while their xG stands at 1.92 versus 1.43 for the away side. In addition, Rudar have kept a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches, whereas Dravinja have failed to score in 50% of away games and have not recorded a single clean sheet. Although the visitors have won 2 of their last 5 matches overall, Rudar’s superior home performance and Dravinja’s defensive weakness point to a comfortable home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by the very weak defensive records of both teams: Rudar concede an average of 2.67 goals, while Dravinja concede 2.25 goals per match, with neither side recording a clean sheet in any match. Rudar have had BTTS in 100% of their matches this season, while across their last five appearances, the figures stand at 60% for the hosts and 80% for Dravinja. Current scoring form also points towards goals, as Rudar have averaged 3.0 goals scored and 2.2 conceded in their last five matches, while Dravinja have scored 2.0 and allowed 2.0 goals per game. However, Dravinja average only 0.5 goals scored across the entire season and have failed to score in 50% of their matches, which reduces confidence in the pick. Nevertheless, their xG of 1.43 and 4.25 shots on target per match indicate that they should create chances against Rudar’s defense. The overall signals are clearly stronger than the league BTTS average of 45%, making a scenario in which both teams score more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to at least two goals, as Rudar have gone over 1.5 goals in 100% of their matches so far, while Dravinja have done so in 75%. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, with Rudar conceding an average of 2.67 goals and Dravinja 2.25 per match. In their last five games, the hosts averaged 3.0 goals scored and the visitors 2.0, while over 2.5 goals landed in 80% of the matches played by each team. The xG data also points to an open game: the hosts create chances worth 1.61 xG, while the visitors average 1.43 xG, with both defenses allowing high xG values. The Over 1.5 line offers the greatest safety margin, even if the high scoring efficiency from recent matches partially declines.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time followed by a Rudar win is the most likely outcome, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 67% of their matches, while Dravinja recorded the same result in 50% of games. Rudar have not yet been ahead at the break, but they have significantly improved after the interval in their last five appearances: they averaged 2.2 goals and won the second half in 60% of cases. Dravinja have averaged only 0.25 goals after half-time in the available season data, lost 75% of second halves, and have a negative goal difference of five. The hosts are also more clinical in front of goal, converting 15% of their shots compared with 5% for the visitors, although their vulnerable defense, conceding an average of 2.67 goals per match, limits confidence in the 1/1 pick. The X/1 scenario best combines a cautious first-half outlook with Rudar's advantage in the closing stages of the match.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rudar | Dravinja | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rudar is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Rudar · 0.8 pts / game - Dravinja
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rudar is 114% better for: goals scored per game.
2.14 goals / game - Rudar · 1 goals / game - Dravinja
Rudar is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.71 goals / game - Rudar · 2.43 goals / game - Dravinja
Rudar scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while Dravinja keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 games).
Dravinja scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 games), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rudar
Over / Under - Dravinja
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dravinja is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.43 pts / game - Rudar · 0.57 pts / game - Dravinja
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rudar - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Dravinja - second-half results
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rudar
Dravinja
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Rudar | Liga | Dravinja | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.86 | 2.90 | ▲ 3.43 |
| Both teams scored | • 43% | 43% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 57% | 56% | • 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 33% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- RudarGoalTian Pantelić
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Rudar's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Dravinja. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rudar vs Dravinja?
The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 3:1 Dravinja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rudar and Dravinja?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rudar won 0, Dravinja won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Dravinja?
Rudar score 2.14 goals per game on average and Dravinja 1.00. The 2. SNL average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Rudar's matches and 71% of Dravinja's.
What form are Rudar and Dravinja in?
Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Dravinja 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Dravinja?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rudar vs Dravinja: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


