Rudar vs Triglav: match statistics
Rudar vs Triglav: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rudar played against Triglav in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Štadion Ob Jezeru. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Rudar has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Triglav has 3 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.25 points per game.
Scoring records
Rudar scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.80. Triglav scores 1.50 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Rudar's games and 25% of Triglav's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 25%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Triglav has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.64 per game. Rudar takes 13.0 shots per game, while Triglav takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Rudar leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.40 goals per game after halftime. Triglav leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rudar's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Triglav, it is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. SNL games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Rudar have a perfect home record, averaging 3.5 goals scored and just 0.5 conceded per match, for a +6 goal difference. The hosts also create more chances: their average xG stands at 1.91, while opponents allow an average xG of 1.04; Rudar take 16 shots per game, including 5.5 on target. Triglav sit higher in the table and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, conceding just 2 goals during that period, which significantly boosts their chances. However, away from home, the visitors score only 1.67 goals per match, failed to score in 33% of such fixtures and lost 1 of 3 games. Rudar’s highly effective home performances, supported by 58% average possession and a 22% shot-conversion rate, give the hosts a slight edge despite Triglav’s strong form.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS pick is not a slight favorite, primarily due to Triglav’s highly solid defense, having conceded just 0.4 goals per game in their last 5 matches and keeping 3 clean sheets in 33% of their appearances to date. Rudar have recently scored as many as 3.6 goals per match, but their seasonal home scoring average is only 1.0, while Triglav allow opponents an xG of 1.38. The visitors have clear attacking credentials, averaging 1.67 goals, 1.88 xG and 4.67 shots on target, making a Triglav goal likely. At the same time, BTTS has occurred in just 0% of Rudar’s matches and 33% of Triglav’s fixtures this season, compared with the league average of 41%. The most realistic scenario is therefore a win for one side without conceding, particularly if Triglav restrict the hosts as effectively as they have in recent weeks.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The latest form of both teams clearly points toward goals: Rudar averaged 3.6 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Triglav averaged 3.2. The hosts also conceded 1.6 goals per game, whereas Triglav allowed opponents just 0.4 goals, which limits the case for a very high line but does not undermine the chances of at least two goals. The chance-quality metrics are also strong, with Rudar averaging 1.73 xG and Triglav 1.48 xG, while the hosts allowed 2.24 xG. At least 3 goals were scored in 80% of Rudar’s last five matches and in 40% of Triglav’s games, compared with the league average of 2.85 goals. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as even after accounting for the visitors’ solid defense, both attacks and the pace shown in recent form clearly favor at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to a draw at half-time and a Triglav victory at full-time: in the current data, both teams were level at the break in all of their matches, while the visitors were not trailing at half-time in any of them. Triglav possess the clearer attacking potential, averaging 1.88 xG compared with Rudar’s 1.43 and registering 15.33 shots per match against the hosts’ 11.0. In their last five matches, the visitors won 80% of their games and averaged 2.2 goals after the break, while Rudar conceded an average of 0.8 goals in second halves. Triglav’s advantage should be particularly evident between the 61st and 75th minutes, when they scored 3 goals, while Rudar have yet to concede after the break in the very small sample from the current season. The hosts remain dangerous, having averaged 3.6 goals scored in their last five matches, but their weaker defensive record of 1.6 goals conceded on average suggests that, after an evenly balanced first half, the visitors will turn the game in their favor. HT/FT: X/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rudar | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Triglav is 88% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Rudar · 2.25 pts / game - Triglav
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rudar is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
1.8 goals / game - Rudar · 1.5 goals / game - Triglav
Triglav is 260% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.8 goals / game - Rudar · 0.5 goals / game - Triglav
Rudar scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 games), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 games).
Triglav scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 games), while Rudar keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rudar
Over / Under - Triglav
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.4 pts / game - Rudar · 1 pts / game - Triglav
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rudar - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Triglav - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 25% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 75% |
| No goal | 75% | 25% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rudar
Triglav
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Rudar | Liga | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.60 | 2.89 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 33% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 69% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Rudar's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Triglav. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rudar vs Triglav?
The 2. SNL match finished Rudar 2:0 Triglav. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Rudar and Triglav?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Rudar won 0, Triglav won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Rudar vs Triglav?
Rudar score 1.80 goals per game on average and Triglav 1.50. The 2. SNL average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Rudar's matches and 25% of Triglav's.
What form are Rudar and Triglav in?
Over the last 5 games Rudar have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Triglav 3-0-1 (2.25 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudar vs Triglav?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


