Rudeš vs Opatija: match statistics
As the league leader with a 70% home win rate, Rudeš holds a clear advantage over Opatija, who win merely 20% of their away matches. In home fixtures, the hosts score an average of 1.4 goals while conceding only 0.6, translating to an impressive 60% clean sheet rate. Away from home, Opatija shows very poor offensive efficiency (averaging 0.5 goals, failing to score in 50% of matches) and a negative goal difference of -8. The difference in xG (1.53 for Rudeš vs 1.17 for Opatija) and ball possession advantage (54% vs 47%) further confirm the hosts' dominance. The recent form of both teams (Rudeš: wlwwd, Opatija: dwwdd) indicates a balanced disposition; however, Rudeš's advantage at their home stadium should determine the outcome. Considering all statistics, a home win is the most probable scenario for this matchup.
Rudeš vs Opatija: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Rudeš played against Opatija in Druga HNL (Croatia). The game was played on March 15, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Rudeš has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Opatija has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Rudeš scores 1.19 goals per game and allows 0.90. Opatija scores 0.67 and allows 1.24. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Rudeš's games and 43% of Opatija's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 38%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Rudeš has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.14 per game. Rudeš takes 10.2 shots per game, while Opatija takes 8.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Rudeš leads at halftime in 48% of its games and scores 0.38 goals per game after halftime. Opatija leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Rudeš's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For Opatija, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Druga HNL games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
As the league leader with a 70% home win rate, Rudeš holds a clear advantage over Opatija, who win merely 20% of their away matches. In home fixtures, the hosts score an average of 1.4 goals while conceding only 0.6, translating to an impressive 60% clean sheet rate. Away from home, Opatija shows very poor offensive efficiency (averaging 0.5 goals, failing to score in 50% of matches) and a negative goal difference of -8. The difference in xG (1.53 for Rudeš vs 1.17 for Opatija) and ball possession advantage (54% vs 47%) further confirm the hosts' dominance. The recent form of both teams (Rudeš: wlwwd, Opatija: dwwdd) indicates a balanced disposition; however, Rudeš's advantage at their home stadium should determine the outcome. Considering all statistics, a home win is the most probable scenario for this matchup.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Rudeš | Opatija | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Rudeš is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Rudeš · 1.8 pts / game - Opatija
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rudeš is 78% better for: goals scored per game.
1.19 goals / game - Rudeš · 0.67 goals / game - Opatija
Rudeš is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.9 goals / game - Rudeš · 1.24 goals / game - Opatija
Rudeš scores in 81% of games (17 of 21 meczów), while Opatija keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 meczów).
Opatija scores in 52% of games (11 of 21 meczów), while Rudeš keeps a clean sheet in 57% (12 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Rudeš
Over / Under - Opatija
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Rudeš is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.86 pts / game - Rudeš · 1.1 pts / game - Opatija
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Rudeš - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Opatija - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Rudeš
Opatija
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).
Teams vs league
| Rudeš | Liga | Opatija | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.10 | 2.17 | ▼ 1.90 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 42% | • 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 39% | • 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 57% | 33% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 62% | • 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 62% | 74% | ▲ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Rudeš's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Opatija. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Rudeš vs Opatija?
The Druga HNL match finished Rudeš 2:0 Opatija. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Rudeš vs Opatija?
Rudeš score 1.19 goals per game on average and Opatija 0.67. The Druga HNL average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Rudeš's matches and 43% of Opatija's.
What form are Rudeš and Opatija in?
Over the last 5 games Rudeš have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Opatija 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Rudeš vs Opatija?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Rudeš vs Opatija: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.